相似文献
1
Comparison of the Grip Strength Using the Martin-Vigorimeter and the JAMAR-Dynamometer: Establishment of Normal Values.
In Vivo. 2017 Sep-Oct;31(5):917-924. doi: 10.21873/invivo.11147.
2
Martin Vigorimeter assesses muscle fatigability in older adults better than the Jamar Dynamometer.
Exp Gerontol. 2018 Oct 1;111:65-70. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2018.07.004. Epub 2018 Jul 9.
3
Comparison of the Jamar dynamometer and the Martin vigorimeter for grip strength measurements in a healthy elderly population.
Scand J Rehabil Med. 1995 Sep;27(3):137-43.
4
Reliability and Validity of the Martin Vigorimeter for Grip Strength Measurement in Korean Adults.
Clin Orthop Surg. 2024 Aug;16(4):610-619. doi: 10.4055/cios23383. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
5
The Martin Vigorimeter Represents a Reliable and More Practical Tool Than the Jamar Dynamometer to Assess Handgrip Strength in the Geriatric Patient.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 May 1;17(5):466.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.02.026.
6
Age-specific reliability of two grip-strength dynamometers when used by children.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 May;90(5):1053-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00469.
7
Grip strength comparison in immune-mediated neuropathies: Vigorimeter vs. Jamar.
J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2015 Sep;20(3):269-76. doi: 10.1111/jns.12126.
8
Validity of the Dexter Evaluation System's Jamar dynamometer attachment for assessment of hand grip strength in a normal population.
J Hand Ther. 2000 Jan-Mar;13(1):46-51. doi: 10.1016/s0894-1130(00)80052-6.
9
Validating the Capability for Measuring Age-Related Changes in Grip-Force Strength Using a Digital Hand-Held Dynamometer in Healthy Young and Elderly Adults.
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Apr 20;2020:6936879. doi: 10.1155/2020/6936879. eCollection 2020.
10
Grip force monitoring on the hand: Manugraphy system versus Jamar dynamometer.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014 Aug;134(8):1179-88. doi: 10.1007/s00402-014-2027-3. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
引用本文的文献
1
Evaluating the feasibility of a rehabilitation intervention including physical activity as structured active play for preschoolers diagnosed with cancer during the first 6 months of treatment-a study based on data from the RePlay trial.
Eur J Pediatr. 2025 Aug 6;184(8):533. doi: 10.1007/s00431-025-06350-y.
2
Preoperative physical resilience indicators and their associations with postoperative outcomes.
Geroscience. 2025 Apr 2. doi: 10.1007/s11357-025-01633-6.
3
Establishing the reliability and validity for GripAble: A handheld sensor-based dynamometry device.
Hand Ther. 2025 Jun;30(2):90-99. doi: 10.1177/17589983251322537. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
4
Accuracy and Reliability of Grip Strength Measurements: A Comparative Device Analysis.
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024 Dec 16;9(4):274. doi: 10.3390/jfmk9040274.
5
Pressure Sensors for Evaluating Hand Grasp and Pinch.
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Sep 5;24(17):5768. doi: 10.3390/s24175768.
6
Reliability and Validity of the Martin Vigorimeter for Grip Strength Measurement in Korean Adults.
Clin Orthop Surg. 2024 Aug;16(4):610-619. doi: 10.4055/cios23383. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
7
Dose-exposure-efficacy response of intravenous immunoglobulin G 10% in multifocal motor neuropathy.
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2024 Aug;11(8):1977-1987. doi: 10.1002/acn3.52098. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
8
Are accelerometer-measured sitting and physical activity times associated with muscle mass and strength in healthy young adults in the UAE?
Heliyon. 2024 May 8;10(10):e30899. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30899. eCollection 2024 May 30.
9
Associations of Muscle Strength with Central Aspects of Pain: Data from the Knee Pain and Related Health in the Community (KPIC) Cohort.
J Pers Med. 2023 Sep 29;13(10):1450. doi: 10.3390/jpm13101450.
10
Grip strength cut-points from the Swiss DO-HEALTH population.
Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2023 Aug 5;20(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s11556-023-00323-6.
本文引用的文献
1
The Martin Vigorimeter Represents a Reliable and More Practical Tool Than the Jamar Dynamometer to Assess Handgrip Strength in the Geriatric Patient.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 May 1;17(5):466.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.02.026.
2
Grip strength dynamometry: reliability and validity for adults with upper limb burns.
Burns. 2013 Nov;39(7):1430-6. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2013.03.020. Epub 2013 May 10.
3
Statistics corner: A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research.
Malawi Med J. 2012 Sep;24(3):69-71.
4
Optimal Jamar dynamometer handle position to assess maximal isometric hand grip strength in epidemiological studies.
J Hand Surg Am. 2012 Nov;37(11):2368-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.08.014.
5
Predicting maximal grip strength using hand circumference.
Man Ther. 2010 Dec;15(6):579-85. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2010.06.010. Epub 2010 Aug 12.
6
Age-specific reliability of two grip-strength dynamometers when used by children.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 May;90(5):1053-9. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00469.
7
Hand span influences optimal grip span in boys and girls aged 6 to 12 years.
J Hand Surg Am. 2008 Mar;33(3):378-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.11.013.
8
Grip strength and forearm circumference in a healthy population.
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2007 Apr;32(2):203-9. doi: 10.1016/J.JHSB.2006.11.003. Epub 2007 Jan 2.
9
Hand span influences optimal grip span in male and female teenagers.
J Hand Surg Am. 2006 Oct;31(8):1367-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.06.014.
10
Test-retest reliability of grip-strength measures obtained over a 12-week interval from community-dwelling elders.
J Hand Ther. 2005 Oct-Dec;18(4):426-7, quiz 428. doi: 10.1197/j.jht.2005.07.003.
Zotero 插件