Gagesch Michael, Wieczorek Maud, Abderhalden Lauren A, Lang Wei, Freystaetter Gregor, Armbrecht Gabriele, Kressig Reto W, Vellas Bruno, Rizzoli René, Blauth Michael, Orav E John, Egli Andreas, Bischoff-Ferrari Heike A
Department of Aging Medicine and Aging Research, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Center On Aging and Mobility, University Hospital Zurich, City Hospital Zurich Waid and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Eur Rev Aging Phys Act. 2023 Aug 5;20(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s11556-023-00323-6.
While grip strength (GS) is commonly assessed using a Dynamometer, the Martin Vigorimeter was proposed as an alternative method especially in older adults. However, its reference values for Swiss older adults are missing. We therefore aimed to derive sex- and age-specific GS cut-points for the dominant and non-dominant hand (DH; NDH) using the Martin Vigorimeter. Additionally, we aimed to identify clinically relevant weakness and assess convergent validity with key markers of physical function and sarcopenia in generally healthy Swiss older adults.
This cross-sectional analysis includes baseline data from Swiss participants enrolled in DO-HEALTH, a 3-year randomized controlled trial in community-dwelling adults age 70 + . For both DH and NDH, 4 different definitions of weakness to derive GS cut-points by sex and age category (≤ 75 vs. > 75 years) were used: i) GS below the median of the 1 quintile, ii) GS below the upper limit of the 1 quintile, iii) GS below 2-standard deviation (SD) of the sex- and age-specific mean in DO-HEALTH Swiss healthy agers (i.e. individuals without major chronic diseases, disabilities, cognitive impairment or mental health issues) and iv) GS below 2.5-SD of the sex- and age-specific mean in DO-HEALTH Swiss healthy agers. To assess the proposed cut-points' convergent validity, we assessed their association with gait speed, time to complete the 5 Times Sit-To-Stand (5TSTS) test, and present sarcopenia.
In total, 976 participants had available GS at the DH (mean age 75.2, 62% women). According to the 4 weakness definitions, GS cut-points at the DH ranged from 29-42 and 25-39 kPa in younger and older women respectively, and from 51-69 and 31-50 kPa in younger and older men respectively. Overall, weakness prevalence ranged from 2.0% to 19.3%. Definitions of weakness using the median and the upper limit of the 1 GS quintile were most consistently associated with markers of physical performance. Weak participants were more likely to have lower gait speed, longer time to complete the 5TSTS, and sarcopenia, compared to participants without weakness.
In generally healthy Swiss older adults, weakness defined by the median or the upper limit of the 1 GS quintile may serve as reference to identify clinically relevant weakness. Additional research is needed in less healthy populations in order to derive representative population-based cut-points.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01745263.
虽然握力(GS)通常使用握力计进行评估,但马丁活力计被提议作为一种替代方法,特别是在老年人中。然而,瑞士老年人的马丁活力计参考值尚缺。因此,我们旨在使用马丁活力计得出优势手和非优势手(DH;NDH)的性别和年龄特异性GS切点。此外,我们旨在识别临床上相关的虚弱情况,并评估其与一般健康的瑞士老年人身体功能和肌肉减少症关键标志物的收敛效度。
这项横断面分析纳入了参与DO-HEALTH研究的瑞士参与者的基线数据,DO-HEALTH是一项针对70岁及以上社区居住成年人的为期3年的随机对照试验。对于DH和NDH,我们使用了4种不同的虚弱定义来按性别和年龄类别(≤75岁与>75岁)得出GS切点:i)GS低于第1五分位数的中位数,ii)GS低于第1五分位数的上限,iii)GS低于DO-HEALTH瑞士健康老年人(即无重大慢性病、残疾、认知障碍或心理健康问题的个体)中性别和年龄特异性均值的2个标准差(SD),以及iv)GS低于DO-HEALTH瑞士健康老年人中性别和年龄特异性均值的2.5个标准差。为了评估所提议切点的收敛效度,我们评估了它们与步速、完成5次坐立试验(5TSTS)的时间以及现患肌肉减少症的关联。
共有976名参与者在DH时有可用的GS数据(平均年龄75.2岁,62%为女性)。根据这4种虚弱定义,DH的GS切点在年轻女性和老年女性中分别为29 - 42kPa和25 - 39kPa,在年轻男性和老年男性中分别为51 - 69kPa和31 - 50kPa。总体而言,虚弱患病率在2.0%至19.3%之间。使用第1 GS五分位数的中位数和上限定义的虚弱与身体表现标志物的关联最为一致。与无虚弱的参与者相比,虚弱参与者更有可能步速较低、完成5TSTS的时间更长且患有肌肉减少症。
在一般健康的瑞士老年人中,由第1 GS五分位数的中位数或上限定义的虚弱可作为识别临床上相关虚弱的参考。为了得出基于人群的代表性切点,需要在健康状况较差的人群中进行更多研究。
ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT01745263