• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2008-2014 年英格兰新生儿重症监护病房收治的极早产儿存活率:时间趋势和地区差异。

Survival of very preterm infants admitted to neonatal care in England 2008-2014: time trends and regional variation.

机构信息

Section of Neonatal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Imperial Clinical Trials Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018 May;103(3):F208-F215. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-312748. Epub 2017 Sep 7.

DOI:10.1136/archdischild-2017-312748
PMID:28883097
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5916099/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyse survival trends and regional variation for very preterm infants admitted to neonatal care.

SETTING

All neonatal units in England.

PATIENTS

Infants born at 22-31 weeksgestational age (GA) over 2008-2014 and admitted to neonatal care; published data for admitted infants 22-25 weeks GA in 1995 and 2006, and for live births at 22-31 weeks GA in 2013.

METHODS

We obtained data from the National Neonatal Research Database. We used logistic regression to model survival probability with birth weight, GA, sex, antenatal steroid exposure and multiple birth included in the risk adjustment model and calculated annualpercentage change (APC) for trends using joinpoint regression. We evaluated survival over a 20-year period for infants <26 weeks' GA using additional published data from the EPICure studies.

RESULTS

We identified 50 112 eligible infants. There was an increase in survival over 2008-2014 (2008: 88.0%; 2014: 91.3%; adjusted APC 0.46% (95% CI 0.30 to 0.62) p<0.001). The greatest improvement was at 22-23 weeks (APC 6.03% (95% CI 2.47 to 3.53) p=0.002). Improvement largely occurred in London and South of England (APC: London 1.26% (95% CI 0.60 to 1.96); South of England 1.09% (95% CI 0.36 to 1.82); Midlands and East of England 0.15% (95% CI -0.56 to 0.86); and North of England 0.26% (95% CI -0.54 to 1.07)). Survival at the earliest gestations improved at a similar rate over 1995-2014 (22-25 weeks, APC 2.73% (95% CI 2.35 to 3.12), p value for change=0.25).

CONCLUSIONS

Continued national improvement in the survival of very preterm admissions masks important regional variation. Timely assessment of preterm survival is feasible using electronic records.

摘要

目的

分析入住新生儿病房的极早产儿的生存趋势和区域差异。

设置

英格兰所有新生儿病房。

患者

2008 年至 2014 年间,胎龄 22-31 周出生并入住新生儿病房的婴儿;1995 年和 2006 年公布的胎龄 22-25 周入院婴儿数据,以及 2013 年胎龄 22-31 周活产儿数据。

方法

我们从国家新生儿研究数据库获得数据。我们使用逻辑回归模型来预测出生体重、胎龄、性别、产前类固醇暴露和多胎等因素对生存概率的影响,并使用 Joinpoint 回归计算趋势的年百分比变化(APC)。我们使用 EPICure 研究的额外公布数据评估了胎龄<26 周的婴儿在 20 年内的生存情况。

结果

我们确定了 50112 名符合条件的婴儿。2008 年至 2014 年间,生存率有所提高(2008 年:88.0%;2014 年:91.3%;调整 APC 0.46%(95%CI 0.30 至 0.62),p<0.001)。最大的改善发生在 22-23 周(APC 6.03%(95%CI 2.47 至 3.53),p=0.002)。改善主要发生在伦敦和英格兰南部(APC:伦敦 1.26%(95%CI 0.60 至 1.96);英格兰南部 1.09%(95%CI 0.36 至 1.82);英格兰中部和东部 0.15%(95%CI -0.56 至 0.86);英格兰北部 0.26%(95%CI -0.54 至 1.07))。在整个胎龄范围内,生存状况在 1995-2014 年间也以相似的速度得到改善(22-25 周,APC 2.73%(95%CI 2.35 至 3.12),p 值为 0.25)。

结论

极早产儿入院生存率的持续全国性提高掩盖了重要的区域差异。使用电子记录可以及时评估早产儿的生存率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e7c/5916099/ae23f86d1f61/fetalneonatal-2017-312748f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e7c/5916099/a1d020d49264/fetalneonatal-2017-312748f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e7c/5916099/ae23f86d1f61/fetalneonatal-2017-312748f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e7c/5916099/a1d020d49264/fetalneonatal-2017-312748f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e7c/5916099/ae23f86d1f61/fetalneonatal-2017-312748f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Survival of very preterm infants admitted to neonatal care in England 2008-2014: time trends and regional variation.2008-2014 年英格兰新生儿重症监护病房收治的极早产儿存活率:时间趋势和地区差异。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2018 May;103(3):F208-F215. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-312748. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
2
Assessment of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Practices, Morbidity, and Mortality Among Very Preterm Infants in China.中国极低出生体重儿新生儿重症监护病房实践、发病和死亡评估。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2118904. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.18904.
3
Changes in neonatology: comparison of two cohorts of very preterm infants (gestational age <32 weeks): the Project On Preterm and Small for Gestational Age Infants 1983 and the Leiden Follow-Up Project on Prematurity 1996-1997.新生儿学的变化:两个极早产儿队列(胎龄<32周)的比较:1983年早产儿和小于胎龄儿项目以及1996 - 1997年莱顿早产随访项目。
Pediatrics. 2005 Feb;115(2):396-405. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1497.
4
Survival rate of very low birth weight infants over a quarter century (1994-2019): A single-institution experience.25 年来极低出生体重儿存活率:单中心经验。
J Neonatal Perinatal Med. 2021;14(2):253-260. doi: 10.3233/NPM-200595.
5
Perinatal outcomes for extremely preterm babies in relation to place of birth in England: the EPICure 2 study.英格兰极早产儿围产期结局与出生地的关系:EPICure 2 研究。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2014 May;99(3):F181-8. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-305555. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
6
Trends in Care Practices, Morbidity, and Mortality of Extremely Preterm Neonates, 1993-2012.1993 - 2012年极早产儿的护理实践、发病率及死亡率趋势
JAMA. 2015 Sep 8;314(10):1039-51. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.10244.
7
Short term outcomes after extreme preterm birth in England: comparison of two birth cohorts in 1995 and 2006 (the EPICure studies).英格兰极早产婴儿的短期预后:1995 年和 2006 年两个出生队列的比较(EPICure 研究)。
BMJ. 2012 Dec 4;345:e7976. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7976.
8
Optimising neonatal services for very preterm births between 27 and 31 weeks gestation in England: the OPTI-PREM mixed-methods study.优化英格兰妊娠27至31周极早产新生儿服务:OPTI-PREM混合方法研究
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Apr;13(12):1-126. doi: 10.3310/JYWC6538.
9
The effects of designation and volume of neonatal care on mortality and morbidity outcomes of very preterm infants in England: retrospective population-based cohort study.英格兰新生儿护理的指定方式和规模对极早产儿死亡率和发病率结局的影响:基于人群的回顾性队列研究
BMJ Open. 2014 Jul 7;4(7):e004856. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004856.
10
Association of Maternal Diabetes With Neonatal Outcomes of Very Preterm and Very Low-Birth-Weight Infants: An International Cohort Study.母亲糖尿病与极早产儿和极低出生体重儿新生儿结局的关系:一项国际队列研究。
JAMA Pediatr. 2018 Sep 1;172(9):867-875. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.1811.

引用本文的文献

1
Neonatal Morbidities and Hospitalization in the First 2 Years of Life Among Infants Born Very Preterm.极早产儿出生后2年内的新生儿发病率及住院情况
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Sep 2;8(9):e2530123. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.30123.
2
Outcomes of Preterm Infants Born at 22 to 23 Weeks' Gestation in 11 International Neonatal Networks.11个国际新生儿网络中孕22至23周出生的早产儿的结局
JAMA Pediatr. 2025 Aug 25. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2025.2958.
3
Trends Over Time in Cognitive Outcomes of Children Born Very Preterm: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
The UK National Neonatal Research Database: using neonatal data for research, quality improvement and more.英国国家新生儿研究数据库:利用新生儿数据进行研究、质量改进及更多用途。
Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2016 Aug;101(4):216-8. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-309928. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
2
Trends in Care Practices, Morbidity, and Mortality of Extremely Preterm Neonates, 1993-2012.1993 - 2012年极早产儿的护理实践、发病率及死亡率趋势
JAMA. 2015 Sep 8;314(10):1039-51. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.10244.
3
Preterm infant outcomes in New South Wales and the Australian Capital Territory.
极早产儿认知结局的长期趋势:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
JAMA Pediatr. 2025 Jul 28. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2025.2221.
4
Facilitating safe transition to home for preterm infants (FAST home): Protocol for a retrospective observational study.促进早产儿安全回家(FAST home):一项回顾性观察研究方案
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 11;20(2):e0318309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318309. eCollection 2025.
5
Understanding the experience of the mothers' ability to take care of their preterm infants related to in-hospital and post-discharge: a qualitative content analysis.了解母亲照顾早产婴儿的能力与住院期间及出院后相关的经历:一项质性内容分析。
BMC Pediatr. 2025 Jan 29;25(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-05338-1.
6
In-utero transfer, survival-focused care and survival to 28-days at 22-24 weeks' gestation pre- and post- implementation of an extreme prematurity management guideline in Victoria, Australia.在澳大利亚维多利亚州实施极早产儿管理指南前后,22-24 孕周的宫内转移、以生存为中心的护理和生存至 28 天的情况。
BMJ Paediatr Open. 2024 Oct 21;8(1):e002462. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2023-002462.
7
Association between preterm birth and asthma and atopic dermatitis in preschool children: a nationwide population-based study.早产与学龄前儿童哮喘和特应性皮炎的关系:一项全国性基于人群的研究。
Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Dec;183(12):5383-5393. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05747-5. Epub 2024 Oct 12.
8
Socioeconomic and ethnic disparities in preterm births in an English maternity setting: a population-based study of 1.3 million births.在英国的产科环境中,社会经济和种族差异与早产有关:一项基于人群的 130 万例分娩研究。
BMC Med. 2024 Sep 20;22(1):371. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03493-x.
9
A protocol for neoWONDER: Neonatal whole population data linkage to improve long-term health and wellbeing of preterm and sick babies.neoWONDER 方案:对新生儿全人群进行数据链接,以改善早产儿和患病婴儿的长期健康和福祉。
PLoS One. 2024 Jul 16;19(7):e0305113. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305113. eCollection 2024.
10
Perinatal optimisation for periviable birth and outcomes: a 4-year network analysis (2018-2021) across a change in national guidance.极早早产儿出生及预后的围产期优化:一项跨越国家指南变化的4年网络分析(2018 - 2021年)
Front Pediatr. 2024 Apr 17;12:1365720. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1365720. eCollection 2024.
新南威尔士州和澳大利亚首都地区的早产儿结局
J Paediatr Child Health. 2015 Jul;51(7):713-21. doi: 10.1111/jpc.12848. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
4
Keeping up with outcomes for infants born at extremely low gestational ages.追踪极早早产儿的预后情况。
JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Mar;169(3):207-8. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.3362.
5
Survival and morbidity of preterm children born at 22 through 34 weeks' gestation in France in 2011: results of the EPIPAGE-2 cohort study.2011 年法国 22 至 34 孕周早产儿的生存和发病情况:EPIPAGE-2 队列研究结果。
JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Mar;169(3):230-8. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.3351.
6
Causes and timing of death in extremely premature infants from 2000 through 2011.2000 年至 2011 年间,极早产儿的死亡原因和时间。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Jan 22;372(4):331-40. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1403489.
7
Direct risk standardisation: a new method for comparing casemix adjusted event rates using complex models.直接风险标准化:使用复杂模型比较病例组合调整后事件率的新方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Oct 29;13:133. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-133.
8
Short term outcomes after extreme preterm birth in England: comparison of two birth cohorts in 1995 and 2006 (the EPICure studies).英格兰极早产婴儿的短期预后:1995 年和 2006 年两个出生队列的比较(EPICure 研究)。
BMJ. 2012 Dec 4;345:e7976. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7976.
9
Comparing regional infant death rates: the influence of preterm births <24 weeks of gestation.比较区域婴儿死亡率:<24 孕周早产儿的影响。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2013 Mar;98(2):F103-7. doi: 10.1136/fetalneonatal-2011-301359. Epub 2012 Jun 9.
10
Prediction of mortality in very premature infants: a systematic review of prediction models.极早产儿病死率预测:预测模型系统评价。
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e23441. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023441. Epub 2011 Sep 8.