Cardiology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, CIBERCV, IMIB-Arrixaca.
Centro Regional de Hemodonación, University of Murcia, CIBERER, IMIB-Arrixaca.
Circ J. 2018 Jan 25;82(2):353-360. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-17-0471. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
Prasugrel has been shown to provide more potency and less variability than clopidogrel, but its potential temporal variability has not been described.Methods and Results:We conducted a prospective open-label study, evaluating platelet reactivity overtime in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients on aspirin and clopidogrel (n=60) or prasugrel (n=61), after a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Blood samples were taken at discharge and at 3 and 6 months. Platelet function tests included VerifyNow (VN-P2Y12), and Multiplate Aggregometry (MEA). By means of VN-P2Y12, prasugrel patients displayed significantly (P<0.001) higher platelet inhibition than clopidogrel patients over time, although there were not significant differences using MEA. Prasugrel patients showed higher platelet inhibition at baseline than at 3 months (59.3±8.1 vs. 105.0±49.2; P<0.001), without significant change at 6 months (107.9±72.0; P=0.919 vs. 3 months). Clopidogrel patients showed a similar trend (160.1±65.1, 184.8±62.7 and 185.0±53.3; baseline vs. 3 months P=0.060; 3 months vs. 6 months P=0.974). High platelet reactivity (HPR) was shown in 16.3% prasugrel patients, with no patient consistently remaining in HPR over time. HPR was detected in 36.6% of the clopidogrel patients, being consistently observed in 15.0% of them. Low platelet reactivity (LPR) was detected in 60.5% prasugrel and 9.8% clopidogrel patients.
Prasugrel patients showed less temporal variation than patients on clopidogrel in terms of HPR. In contrast, higher variability in LPR was detected in prasugrel patients for up to 6 months' follow-up.
与氯吡格雷相比,普拉格雷具有更强的效力和更小的变异性,但尚未描述其潜在的时间变异性。
我们进行了一项前瞻性、开放标签研究,评估了经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者服用阿司匹林和氯吡格雷(n=60)或普拉格雷(n=61)的血小板反应随时间的变化。在出院时以及 3 个月和 6 个月时采集血样。血小板功能试验包括 VerifyNow(VN-P2Y12)和 Multiplate 聚集仪(MEA)。通过 VN-P2Y12,普拉格雷患者的血小板抑制作用明显(P<0.001)随着时间的推移高于氯吡格雷患者,尽管使用 MEA 时没有显著差异。普拉格雷患者在基线时的血小板抑制作用高于 3 个月时(59.3±8.1 比 105.0±49.2;P<0.001),但 6 个月时没有显著变化(107.9±72.0;P=0.919 与 3 个月时)。氯吡格雷患者也显示出类似的趋势(160.1±65.1、184.8±62.7 和 185.0±53.3;基线与 3 个月 P=0.060;3 个月与 6 个月 P=0.974)。16.3%的普拉格雷患者显示出高血小板反应(HPR),但没有患者始终保持时间上的 HPR。氯吡格雷患者中 36.6%检测到 HPR,其中 15.0%始终存在 HPR。60.5%的普拉格雷和 9.8%的氯吡格雷患者检测到低血小板反应(LPR)。
与氯吡格雷相比,普拉格雷患者在 HPR 方面显示出较小的时间变化。相比之下,普拉格雷患者的 LPR 在长达 6 个月的随访中显示出更高的变异性。