Suppr超能文献

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术后急性冠脉综合征患者中普拉格雷和氯吡格雷的血小板反应的时间变化。

Temporal Changes in Platelet Response in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients With Prasugrel and Clopidogrel After Stent Implantation.

机构信息

Cardiology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, CIBERCV, IMIB-Arrixaca.

Centro Regional de Hemodonación, University of Murcia, CIBERER, IMIB-Arrixaca.

出版信息

Circ J. 2018 Jan 25;82(2):353-360. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-17-0471. Epub 2017 Sep 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prasugrel has been shown to provide more potency and less variability than clopidogrel, but its potential temporal variability has not been described.Methods and Results:We conducted a prospective open-label study, evaluating platelet reactivity overtime in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients on aspirin and clopidogrel (n=60) or prasugrel (n=61), after a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Blood samples were taken at discharge and at 3 and 6 months. Platelet function tests included VerifyNow (VN-P2Y12), and Multiplate Aggregometry (MEA). By means of VN-P2Y12, prasugrel patients displayed significantly (P<0.001) higher platelet inhibition than clopidogrel patients over time, although there were not significant differences using MEA. Prasugrel patients showed higher platelet inhibition at baseline than at 3 months (59.3±8.1 vs. 105.0±49.2; P<0.001), without significant change at 6 months (107.9±72.0; P=0.919 vs. 3 months). Clopidogrel patients showed a similar trend (160.1±65.1, 184.8±62.7 and 185.0±53.3; baseline vs. 3 months P=0.060; 3 months vs. 6 months P=0.974). High platelet reactivity (HPR) was shown in 16.3% prasugrel patients, with no patient consistently remaining in HPR over time. HPR was detected in 36.6% of the clopidogrel patients, being consistently observed in 15.0% of them. Low platelet reactivity (LPR) was detected in 60.5% prasugrel and 9.8% clopidogrel patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Prasugrel patients showed less temporal variation than patients on clopidogrel in terms of HPR. In contrast, higher variability in LPR was detected in prasugrel patients for up to 6 months' follow-up.

摘要

背景

与氯吡格雷相比,普拉格雷具有更强的效力和更小的变异性,但尚未描述其潜在的时间变异性。

方法和结果

我们进行了一项前瞻性、开放标签研究,评估了经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者服用阿司匹林和氯吡格雷(n=60)或普拉格雷(n=61)的血小板反应随时间的变化。在出院时以及 3 个月和 6 个月时采集血样。血小板功能试验包括 VerifyNow(VN-P2Y12)和 Multiplate 聚集仪(MEA)。通过 VN-P2Y12,普拉格雷患者的血小板抑制作用明显(P<0.001)随着时间的推移高于氯吡格雷患者,尽管使用 MEA 时没有显著差异。普拉格雷患者在基线时的血小板抑制作用高于 3 个月时(59.3±8.1 比 105.0±49.2;P<0.001),但 6 个月时没有显著变化(107.9±72.0;P=0.919 与 3 个月时)。氯吡格雷患者也显示出类似的趋势(160.1±65.1、184.8±62.7 和 185.0±53.3;基线与 3 个月 P=0.060;3 个月与 6 个月 P=0.974)。16.3%的普拉格雷患者显示出高血小板反应(HPR),但没有患者始终保持时间上的 HPR。氯吡格雷患者中 36.6%检测到 HPR,其中 15.0%始终存在 HPR。60.5%的普拉格雷和 9.8%的氯吡格雷患者检测到低血小板反应(LPR)。

结论

与氯吡格雷相比,普拉格雷患者在 HPR 方面显示出较小的时间变化。相比之下,普拉格雷患者的 LPR 在长达 6 个月的随访中显示出更高的变异性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验