Department of Emergency Medicine, the University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa.
Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, Fla.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 Sep-Oct;5(5):1295-1301. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.07.020.
Anaphylaxis is a systemic allergic reaction that is commonly treated in the emergency department (ED). The risk of a biphasic reaction is the rationale for observation.
To derive a prediction rule to stratify ED anaphylaxis patients at risk of a biphasic reaction.
We conducted an observational study of a cohort of patients presenting to an academic ED with signs and symptoms of anaphylaxis. We collected clinical data on biphasic reactions meeting National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Disease/Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network diagnostic criteria. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify predictors of biphasic reactions, and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs are reported. The predictive ability of the model features is summarized using the area under a receiver operating characteristics curve, or AUC. Internally validated AUCs were obtained using bootstrap resampling.
We identified 872 anaphylaxis-related visits. Thirty-six (4.1%) visits resulted in biphasic reactions. Multivariable analysis showed that prior anaphylaxis (OR, 2.74; 95% CI, 1.33-5.63), unknown inciting trigger (OR, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.14-4.99), and first epinephrine administration more than 60 minutes after symptom onset (OR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.09-4.79) were statistically significantly associated with biphasic reactions. The AUC of this model was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.61-0.79), with an internally validated AUC of 0.67 (95% CI, 0.59-0.76). The P value from the goodness-of-fit test was .91.
Our study demonstrated a 4.1% rate of biphasic reactions and found that prior anaphylaxis, unknown inciting trigger, and delayed epinephrine use were risk factors for biphasic reactions.
过敏反应是一种全身性过敏反应,通常在急诊科(ED)进行治疗。发生双相反应的风险是进行观察的依据。
制定一种预测规则,对出现过敏反应的 ED 患者进行分层,以确定发生双相反应的风险。
我们对一组出现过敏反应症状和体征并就诊于学术 ED 的患者进行了一项观察性研究。我们收集了符合国家过敏和传染病研究所/食物过敏和过敏反应网络诊断标准的双相反应的临床数据。使用逻辑回归分析确定双相反应的预测因素,并报告比值比(OR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)。使用接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)总结模型特征的预测能力。使用 bootstrap 重采样获得内部验证的 AUC。
我们确定了 872 例与过敏反应相关的就诊。36 例(4.1%)就诊发生了双相反应。多变量分析显示,既往过敏反应(OR,2.74;95%CI,1.33-5.63)、未知诱发因素(OR,2.40;95%CI,1.14-4.99)和首次肾上腺素给药时间晚于症状发作后 60 分钟(OR,2.29;95%CI,1.09-4.79)与双相反应有统计学显著相关性。该模型的 AUC 为 0.70(95%CI,0.61-0.79),内部验证的 AUC 为 0.67(95%CI,0.59-0.76)。拟合优度检验的 P 值为.91。
我们的研究显示,双相反应的发生率为 4.1%,发现既往过敏反应、未知诱发因素和延迟使用肾上腺素是双相反应的危险因素。