Suppr超能文献

进一步评估可能预测急诊科过敏反应患者双相反应的因素。

Further Evaluation of Factors That May Predict Biphasic Reactions in Emergency Department Anaphylaxis Patients.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, the University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa.

Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, Fla.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 Sep-Oct;5(5):1295-1301. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.07.020.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Anaphylaxis is a systemic allergic reaction that is commonly treated in the emergency department (ED). The risk of a biphasic reaction is the rationale for observation.

OBJECTIVE

To derive a prediction rule to stratify ED anaphylaxis patients at risk of a biphasic reaction.

METHODS

We conducted an observational study of a cohort of patients presenting to an academic ED with signs and symptoms of anaphylaxis. We collected clinical data on biphasic reactions meeting National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Disease/Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Network diagnostic criteria. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify predictors of biphasic reactions, and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs are reported. The predictive ability of the model features is summarized using the area under a receiver operating characteristics curve, or AUC. Internally validated AUCs were obtained using bootstrap resampling.

RESULTS

We identified 872 anaphylaxis-related visits. Thirty-six (4.1%) visits resulted in biphasic reactions. Multivariable analysis showed that prior anaphylaxis (OR, 2.74; 95% CI, 1.33-5.63), unknown inciting trigger (OR, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.14-4.99), and first epinephrine administration more than 60 minutes after symptom onset (OR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.09-4.79) were statistically significantly associated with biphasic reactions. The AUC of this model was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.61-0.79), with an internally validated AUC of 0.67 (95% CI, 0.59-0.76). The P value from the goodness-of-fit test was .91.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated a 4.1% rate of biphasic reactions and found that prior anaphylaxis, unknown inciting trigger, and delayed epinephrine use were risk factors for biphasic reactions.

摘要

背景

过敏反应是一种全身性过敏反应,通常在急诊科(ED)进行治疗。发生双相反应的风险是进行观察的依据。

目的

制定一种预测规则,对出现过敏反应的 ED 患者进行分层,以确定发生双相反应的风险。

方法

我们对一组出现过敏反应症状和体征并就诊于学术 ED 的患者进行了一项观察性研究。我们收集了符合国家过敏和传染病研究所/食物过敏和过敏反应网络诊断标准的双相反应的临床数据。使用逻辑回归分析确定双相反应的预测因素,并报告比值比(OR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)。使用接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)总结模型特征的预测能力。使用 bootstrap 重采样获得内部验证的 AUC。

结果

我们确定了 872 例与过敏反应相关的就诊。36 例(4.1%)就诊发生了双相反应。多变量分析显示,既往过敏反应(OR,2.74;95%CI,1.33-5.63)、未知诱发因素(OR,2.40;95%CI,1.14-4.99)和首次肾上腺素给药时间晚于症状发作后 60 分钟(OR,2.29;95%CI,1.09-4.79)与双相反应有统计学显著相关性。该模型的 AUC 为 0.70(95%CI,0.61-0.79),内部验证的 AUC 为 0.67(95%CI,0.59-0.76)。拟合优度检验的 P 值为.91。

结论

我们的研究显示,双相反应的发生率为 4.1%,发现既往过敏反应、未知诱发因素和延迟使用肾上腺素是双相反应的危险因素。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验