Division of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Division of Emergency Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Mass; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023 Apr;11(4):1184-1189. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.01.029. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
Variation in the use of treatments and hospitalization for anaphylaxis would suggest a lack of consensus in therapeutic approach.
To evaluate trends and practice variation in the emergency department (ED) care of children with anaphylaxis in a large US cohort.
We conducted a 48-site retrospective cohort study using the Pediatric Health Information System from January 2016 through September 2022. Children younger than 18 years with a primary diagnosis of anaphylaxis were included. Care trends were assessed using negative binomial regression modeling. Rates of medication use, hospitalizations, and revisits were reported as medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs).
There were 42,909 ED visits for anaphylaxis, with a 4.2% per-year increase in visit incidence (95% CI, 1.8-6.7) during the study period. The median hospitalization rate was 3.5% (IQR, 2.2-6.0), and the 3-day ED revisit rate was 0.6% (IQR, 0.4-0.9). The hospital-level median use of therapies included intramuscular epinephrine (55.3%; IQR, 50.1-59.9), systemic steroids (73.8%; IQR, 63.9-81.4), antihistamines (59.9%; IQR, 53.5-65.5), H2-receptor antagonists (56.8%; IQR, 42.3-66.2), bronchodilators (15.1%; IQR, 12.5-17.0), inhaled epinephrine (1.1%; IQR, 0.6-1.9), and fluid boluses (19.8%; IQR, 11.3-29.3). Severe reactions requiring intensive care unit admission (1.5%; IQR, 0.8-2.2), vasopressors (0.3%; IQR, 0.0-0.6), and intubation (0.2%; IQR, 0.0-0.3) were rare.
ED visits for anaphylaxis increased during the study period, but hospitalization rates were low. Substantial variation exists between EDs regarding the use of anaphylaxis therapies, supporting the need for future research to evaluate the efficacy of these medications.
治疗和住院治疗过敏反应的差异表明治疗方法缺乏共识。
评估在美国大型队列中,急诊室(ED)治疗儿童过敏反应的趋势和实践差异。
我们使用儿童健康信息系统进行了一项 48 个地点的回顾性队列研究,该系统从 2016 年 1 月至 2022 年 9 月进行。纳入年龄小于 18 岁且有过敏反应主要诊断的儿童。使用负二项式回归模型评估护理趋势。药物使用、住院和复诊的比例报告为中位数,四分位距(IQR)。
ED 就诊中,有 42909 例过敏反应,就诊发生率以每年 4.2%的速度增长(95%CI,1.8-6.7)。中位住院率为 3.5%(IQR,2.2-6.0),3 天 ED 复诊率为 0.6%(IQR,0.4-0.9)。医院级治疗的中位使用包括肌内肾上腺素(55.3%;IQR,50.1-59.9)、全身类固醇(73.8%;IQR,63.9-81.4)、抗组胺药(59.9%;IQR,53.5-65.5)、H2 受体拮抗剂(56.8%;IQR,42.3-66.2)、支气管扩张剂(15.1%;IQR,12.5-17.0)、吸入肾上腺素(1.1%;IQR,0.6-1.9)和液体冲击(19.8%;IQR,11.3-29.3)。需要重症监护病房入院(1.5%;IQR,0.8-2.2)、血管加压药(0.3%;IQR,0.0-0.6)和插管(0.2%;IQR,0.0-0.3)的严重反应很少见。
研究期间,过敏反应的 ED 就诊增加,但住院率较低。ED 之间在过敏反应治疗药物的使用方面存在很大差异,需要进一步研究评估这些药物的疗效。