• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肝移植质量评估的统计学方法

Statistical approach to quality assessment in liver transplantation.

作者信息

Schrem Harald, Volz Sophia, Koch Hans-Friedrich, Gwiasda Jill, Kürsch Priscila, Goldis Alon, Pöhnert Daniel, Winny Markus, Klempnauer Jürgen, Kaltenborn Alexander

机构信息

Core Facility Quality Management & Health Technology Assessment in Transplantation, Integrated Research and Treatment Center Transplantation (IFB-Tx), Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.

Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2018 Feb;403(1):61-71. doi: 10.1007/s00423-017-1612-7. Epub 2017 Sep 9.

DOI:10.1007/s00423-017-1612-7
PMID:28889185
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study investigated the utility of retrospective two one-sided cumulative sum (CUSUM) charts combined with multivariable regression analysis in liver transplantation for transplant center benchmarking.

METHODS

One thousand seven hundred and forty-nine consecutive adult primary liver transplants (January 1, 1983 to December 31, 2012) were analyzed retrospectively with two one-sided CUSUM chart analysis of 90-day mortality.

RESULTS

Three eras and two subseries in latest era 3 were identified due to graphically delineated relevant shifts in mean 90-day mortality. Delineation of eras 1, 2, and 3 coincided with relevant changes in allocation policies. CUSUM analysis detected a resurgence of higher mean 90-day mortality in era 3 after results had improved continuously over 25 years. In era 3, two subseries were identified with improving mean 90-day mortality rates from 15.4% in subseries 1 to 8.9% in the following subseries 2. The quantitative influence of independent risk factors on 90-day mortality differed markedly between all identified eras and subseries as assessed with multivariable regression analysis deployed on era-specific subcohorts.

CONCLUSION

The assessed methodology is able to identify meaningful center-specific eras and subseries of liver transplantation with striking alterations of the significance and weight of outcome drivers for post-transplant 90-day mortality over time. This warrants the introduction of prospective risk-adjusted two one-sided CUSUM chart analysis into quality management in liver transplantation in Germany with the goal to obtain alarm signals as early as possible.

摘要

目的

本研究探讨回顾性双侧累积和(CUSUM)图表结合多变量回归分析在肝移植中用于移植中心基准评估的效用。

方法

对1983年1月1日至2012年12月31日期间连续进行的1749例成人原发性肝移植进行回顾性分析,采用双侧CUSUM图表分析90天死亡率。

结果

由于90天平均死亡率在图形上出现了明显的相关变化,确定了三个时期以及最新时期3中的两个子系列。时期1、2和3的划分与分配政策的相关变化一致。CUSUM分析发现,在结果持续改善25年后,时期3的90天平均死亡率再次上升。在时期3中,确定了两个子系列,90天平均死亡率从子系列1中的15.4%降至随后子系列2中的8.9%。通过对特定时期亚队列进行多变量回归分析评估,所有确定的时期和子系列中,独立危险因素对90天死亡率的定量影响存在显著差异。

结论

所评估的方法能够识别肝移植中有意义的特定中心时期和子系列,随着时间推移,移植后90天死亡率的结果驱动因素的重要性和权重发生了显著变化。这使得在德国将前瞻性风险调整后的双侧CUSUM图表分析引入肝移植质量管理成为必要,目的是尽早获得警报信号。

相似文献

1
Statistical approach to quality assessment in liver transplantation.肝移植质量评估的统计学方法
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2018 Feb;403(1):61-71. doi: 10.1007/s00423-017-1612-7. Epub 2017 Sep 9.
2
Quality of pancreatic transplant program assessment using a risk-adjusted cumulative sum chart: experience from a single, small center.
Transplant Proc. 2014 Oct;46(8):2810-4. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2014.08.013.
3
Monitoring surgical and medical outcomes: the Bernoulli cumulative SUM chart. A novel application to assess clinical interventions.监测手术和医疗结果:伯努利累积和控制图。评估临床干预措施的一种新应用。
Postgrad Med J. 2005 Oct;81(960):647-52. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2004.030619.
4
Transplant center quality assessment using a continuously updatable, risk-adjusted technique (CUSUM).使用持续更新的风险调整技术(累积和法)进行移植中心质量评估。
Am J Transplant. 2006 Feb;6(2):313-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.01191.x.
5
Cumulative risk adjusted monitoring of 30-day mortality after cardiothoracic transplantation: UK experience.心胸移植术后30天死亡率的累积风险调整监测:英国经验。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005 Jun;27(6):1022-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.02.033. Epub 2005 Apr 8.
6
Consequences of the implementation of the Model for End-stage Liver Disease system for liver allocation in Brazil.巴西实施终末期肝病模型系统进行肝脏分配的后果。
Transplant Proc. 2013 Jul-Aug;45(6):2111-4. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.11.007. Epub 2013 Jun 5.
7
The model for end-stage liver disease allocation system for liver transplantation saves lives, but increases morbidity and cost: a prospective outcome analysis.终末期肝病模型肝移植分配系统可拯救生命,但会增加发病率和成本:前瞻性结局分析。
Liver Transpl. 2011 Jun;17(6):674-84. doi: 10.1002/lt.22228.
8
Identifying the futile pediatric liver re-transplant in the PELD era.在儿童终末期肝病模型(PELD)时代识别无效的小儿肝脏再次移植。
Pediatr Transplant. 2010 Dec;14(8):1019-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2010.01400.x. Epub 2010 Sep 23.
9
Liver transplantation for acute liver failure: are there thresholds not to be crossed?急性肝衰竭的肝移植:是否存在不可逾越的阈值?
Transpl Int. 2014 Jun;27(6):625-33. doi: 10.1111/tri.12302. Epub 2014 Apr 23.
10
Post-liver transplant survival in hepatitis C patients is improving over time.随着时间的推移,丙型肝炎患者肝移植后的生存率正在提高。
Liver Transpl. 2009 Apr;15(4):360-8. doi: 10.1002/lt.21691.

引用本文的文献

1
Deep Learning-Adjusted Monitoring of In-Hospital Mortality after Liver Transplantation.深度学习调整后的肝移植术后院内死亡率监测
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 10;13(20):6046. doi: 10.3390/jcm13206046.
2
Use of statistical process control in quality improvement projects in abdominal surgery: a PRISMA systematic review.应用统计过程控制于腹部外科手术质量改进项目:PRISMA 系统回顾。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Feb 1;13(1):e002328. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002328.
3
Current Techniques and Indications for Machine Perfusion and Regional Perfusion in Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation.

本文引用的文献

1
The new liver allocation score for transplantation is validated and improved transplant survival benefit in Germany but not in the United Kingdom.用于移植的新肝脏分配评分在德国得到验证,且改善了移植后的生存获益,但在英国并非如此。
Liver Transpl. 2016 Jun;22(6):743-56. doi: 10.1002/lt.24421.
2
Application of the statistical process control method for prospective patient safety monitoring during the learning phase: robotic kidney transplantation with regional hypothermia (IDEAL phase 2a-b).统计过程控制方法在学习阶段前瞻性患者安全监测中的应用:区域低温下的机器人肾移植(IDEAL 阶段 2a-b)。
Eur Urol. 2014 Aug;66(2):371-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.02.055. Epub 2014 Mar 4.
3
尸体供肝移植中机器灌注和区域灌注的当前技术及适应证
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2024 Mar-Apr;14(2):101309. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2023.101309. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
4
Reported effects of the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients 5-tier rating system on US transplant centers: results of a national survey.报告的器官移植受者科学注册系统 5 级评分系统对美国移植中心的影响:全国调查结果。
Transpl Int. 2018 Oct;31(10):1135-1143. doi: 10.1111/tri.13282. Epub 2018 Jun 10.
5
Prognostic factors for long-term survival after adult liver transplantation.成人肝移植术后长期生存的预后因素。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2018 Jun;403(4):495-508. doi: 10.1007/s00423-018-1670-5. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
Prognostic limitations of the Eurotransplant-Donor Risk Index in liver transplantation.
欧洲移植供体风险指数在肝移植中的预后局限性
J Negat Results Biomed. 2013 Dec 24;12:18. doi: 10.1186/1477-5751-12-18.
4
Liver transplantation in highest acuity recipients: identifying factors to avoid futility.极高危受体的肝移植:识别避免无效的因素。
Ann Surg. 2014 Jun;259(6):1186-94. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000265.
5
Organ transplantation in Germany: regulating scandals and scandalous regulation.德国的器官移植:规范丑闻与丑闻性规范
Eur J Health Law. 2013 Apr;20(2):113-6. doi: 10.1163/15718093-12341261.
6
Germany: Avoid more organ transplant scandals.德国:避免更多器官移植丑闻。
Nature. 2013 Jun 6;498(7452):37. doi: 10.1038/498037b.
7
[Deceased donor liver transplantation].[已故供体肝移植]
Chirurg. 2013 May;84(5):391-7. doi: 10.1007/s00104-012-2413-8.
8
Analysis of the surgical learning curve using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method.应用累积和(CUSUM)法分析手术学习曲线。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2013 Sep;32(7):964-7. doi: 10.1002/nau.22375. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
9
Institution learning curve of laparoscopic colectomy--a multi-dimensional analysis.腹腔镜结肠切除术的机构学习曲线——多维分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012 Apr;27(4):527-33. doi: 10.1007/s00384-011-1358-6. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
10
Liver transplantation in the high MELD era: a fair chance for everyone?高 MELD 时代的肝移植:每个人都有公平的机会吗?
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2011 Apr;396(4):461-5. doi: 10.1007/s00423-011-0766-y. Epub 2011 Mar 8.