Smith-Howard Kendra
Technol Cult. 2017;58(3):722-748. doi: 10.1353/tech.2017.0079.
Between 1945 and 1970, the introduction of antibiotics in agriculture forced veterinarians to articulate the boundaries of their professional identity. While veterinarians welcomed the new aid to arrest infectious diseases of livestock, they worried as farmers took animal healing into their own hands without veterinary supervision, and resented the competition from retail outlets that sold the drugs. Veterinary antibiotics also set off heated debates within the field about whether the profession should position itself as preventers or healers of disease, debates that were akin to the kinds of professional discourses among physicians and pharmacists in the same period. By calling attention to the social context that helped facilitate an increasing reliance on the veterinary antibiotics, this article helps explain the sources of present-day overuse of such antibiotics in American agriculture.
1945年至1970年间,农业领域引入抗生素迫使兽医明确其职业身份的界限。虽然兽医欢迎这种有助于控制牲畜传染病的新手段,但他们担心农民在没有兽医监督的情况下自行治疗动物疾病,并且不满零售药店销售这些药物带来的竞争。兽用抗生素还在该领域引发了激烈辩论,讨论该职业应将自身定位为疾病预防者还是治疗者,这些辩论类似于同一时期医生和药剂师之间的专业讨论。通过关注有助于促进对兽用抗生素日益依赖的社会背景,本文有助于解释当今美国农业中此类抗生素过度使用的根源。