Syal Kartik, Chandel Ankita
Department of Anaesthesia, Indira Gandhi Medical College, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India.
Indian J Anaesth. 2017 Aug;61(8):643-648. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_81_17.
Paravertebral block, pectoral nerve (Pecs) block and wound infiltration are three modalities for post-operative analgesia following breast surgery. This study compares the analgesic efficacy of these techniques for post-operative analgesia.
Sixty-five patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists' physical status 1 or 2 undergoing modified radical mastectomy with axillary dissection were recruited for the study. All patients received 21 mL 0.5% bupivacaine with adrenaline in the technique which was performed at the end of the surgery prior to extubation. Patients in Group 1 (local anaesthetic [LA], = 22) received infiltration at the incision site after surgery, Group 2 patients (paravertebral block [PVB], = 22) received ultrasound-guided ipsilateral paravertebral block while Group 3 patients [PECT] ( = 21) received ultrasound-guided ipsilateral Pecs blocks I and II. Patients were evaluated for pain scores at 0, 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24 h, duration of post-operative analgesia and rescue analgesic doses required. Non-normally distributed data were analysed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and Analysis of variance for normal distribution.
The post-operative visual analogue scale scores were lower in PVB group compared with others at 0, 2, 4, 12 and 24 h ( < 0.05). Mean duration of analgesia was significantly prolonged in PVB group ( < 0.001) with lesser rescue analgesic consumption up to 24 h.
Ultrasound-guided paravertebral block reduces post-operative pain scores, prolongs the duration of analgesia and decreases demands for rescue analgesics in the first 24 h of post-operative period compared to ultrasound-guided Pecs block and local infiltration block.
椎旁阻滞、胸段神经(Pecs)阻滞和伤口浸润是乳腺手术后三种术后镇痛方式。本研究比较了这些技术用于术后镇痛的效果。
招募65例美国麻醉医师协会身体状况1或2级、行改良根治性乳房切除术并腋窝清扫术的患者进行研究。所有患者在手术结束拔管前接受该技术下21 mL含肾上腺素的0.5%布比卡因。第1组(局部麻醉[LA],n = 22)患者术后在切口部位进行浸润,第2组患者(椎旁阻滞[PVB],n = 22)接受超声引导下同侧椎旁阻滞,而第3组患者(PECT,n = 21)接受超声引导下同侧胸段神经I和II阻滞。评估患者在0、2、4、6、12和24小时的疼痛评分、术后镇痛持续时间以及所需的补救镇痛剂量。非正态分布数据采用Kruskal-Wallis检验分析,正态分布数据采用方差分析。
在0、2、4、12和24小时,PVB组术后视觉模拟量表评分低于其他组(P < 0.05)。PVB组的平均镇痛持续时间显著延长(P < 0.001),直至24小时补救镇痛药物消耗量更少。
与超声引导下的胸段神经阻滞和局部浸润阻滞相比,超声引导下的椎旁阻滞可降低术后疼痛评分,延长镇痛持续时间,并减少术后24小时内对补救镇痛药物的需求。