Kurien Roshan K, Salins Serina Ruth, Jacob Paul Mazhuvanchary, Thomas Kurien
Department of Anaesthesia, Christian Medical College, Vellore, 632004 Tamil Nadu India.
Department of Endocrine Surgery, Christian Medical College, Vellore, 632004 Tamil Nadu India.
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2021 Dec;12(4):713-721. doi: 10.1007/s13193-021-01382-w. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
Multidisciplinary treatment and multimodal analgesia are the approach to reduce mortality and morbidity of breast cancer. Pectoral nerve block (PECS I and II) is one of the modes of analgesia advocated. The primary aim is to find the risks and benefits of the block in providing analgesia for intraoperative and immediate postoperative cancer-related breast surgery and total morphine consumption. The secondary aim is to evaluate, any additional knowledge acquired, in the reduction of persistent chronic pain state and cancer recurrence, during the time frame studied. The study was conducted after the approval of the ethics committee and National Registry, and included patients of ASA I and II undergoing mastectomy surgery with axillary clearance, under general anesthesia, during the period of 2017 to 2018. A total of 60 patients were recruited, randomizing them into two groups: group 1 ( = 30): ultrasound-guided PECS I (0.2 ml/kg) and PECS II (0.4 ml/kg) block, post-induction with 0.25% levobupivacaine, maximum dose of 2 mg/kg; group 2 ( = 30): no block, only general anesthesia. Intraoperatively, vitals were monitored at regular intervals and analgesics given as per response. Postoperatively, pain was assessed using the numerical pain score and arm abduction score, until discharge. Data collected was analyzed and interpreted using statistical methods. Patients were followed up telephonically, until six months for any chronic pain and cancer recurrence instances. The PECS block group used less morphine intra and postoperatively, which was statistically significant ( = 0.0001). Group 1- Had a significant decrease in the mean intraoperative systolic blood pressure ( = 0.03). There was significant improvement in the arm abduction in the test group as compared to that in the control group ( = 0.001). The average time for block performance was 7.9 min and no complications were observed. No patients in the study groups reported chronic pain or cancer recurrence issues. The two-level PECS block is safe, effective, reliable, and easy to perform. CTRI/2017/11/010630.
多学科治疗和多模式镇痛是降低乳腺癌死亡率和发病率的方法。胸神经阻滞(PECS I和II)是所倡导的镇痛模式之一。主要目的是找出该阻滞在为术中及术后即刻与癌症相关的乳房手术提供镇痛及总吗啡消耗量方面的风险和益处。次要目的是评估在所研究的时间段内,在减轻持续性慢性疼痛状态和癌症复发方面所获得的任何额外知识。该研究在伦理委员会和国家注册机构批准后进行,纳入了2017年至2018年期间在全身麻醉下接受乳房切除术并腋窝清扫的ASA I级和II级患者。共招募了60名患者,将他们随机分为两组:第1组(n = 30):超声引导下PECS I(0.2 ml/kg)和PECS II(0.4 ml/kg)阻滞,诱导后使用0.25%左旋布比卡因,最大剂量2 mg/kg;第2组(n = 30):不进行阻滞,仅采用全身麻醉。术中定期监测生命体征,并根据反应给予镇痛药。术后,使用数字疼痛评分和手臂外展评分评估疼痛,直至出院。使用统计方法对收集的数据进行分析和解释。通过电话对患者进行随访,直至六个月,了解任何慢性疼痛和癌症复发情况。PECS阻滞组术中和术后使用的吗啡较少,具有统计学意义(p = 0.0001)。第1组术中平均收缩压显著降低(p = 0.03)。与对照组相比,试验组的手臂外展有显著改善(p = 0.001)。阻滞操作的平均时间为7.9分钟,未观察到并发症。研究组中没有患者报告慢性疼痛或癌症复发问题。两级PECS阻滞安全、有效、可靠且易于实施。CTRI/2017/11/010630。