Suppr超能文献

一般领域认知能力和十进制标签在四年级高危学生对小数大小理解中的作用。

The Role of Domain-General Cognitive Abilities and Decimal Labels in At-Risk Fourth-Grade Students' Decimal Magnitude Understanding.

作者信息

Malone Amelia S, Loehr Abbey M, Fuchs Lynn S

机构信息

Vanderbilt University.

出版信息

Learn Individ Differ. 2017 Aug;58:90-96. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2017.05.007. Epub 2017 May 28.

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to determine whether individual differences in at-risk 4 graders' language comprehension, nonverbal reasoning, concept formation, working memory, and use of decimal labels (i.e., place value, point, incorrect place value, incorrect fraction, or whole number) are related to their decimal magnitude understanding. Students (n = 127) completed 6 cognitive assessments, a decimal labeling assessment, and 3 measures of decimal magnitude understanding (i.e., comparing decimals to the fraction [Formula: see text] benchmark task, estimating where decimals belong on a 0-1 number line, and identifying fraction and decimal equivalencies). Each of the domain-general cognitive abilities predicted students' decimal magnitude understanding. Using place value labels was positively correlated with students' decimal magnitude understanding, whereas using whole-number labels was negatively correlated with students' decimal magnitude understanding. Language comprehension, nonverbal reasoning, and concept formation were positively correlated with students' use of place value labels. By contrast, language comprehension and nonverbal reasoning were negatively correlated with students' use of whole number labels. Implications for the development of decimal magnitude understanding and design of effective instruction for at-risk students are discussed.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定四年级高危学生在语言理解、非言语推理、概念形成、工作记忆以及小数标签使用(即位值、小数点、错误的位值、错误的分数或整数)方面的个体差异是否与他们对小数大小的理解有关。学生(n = 127)完成了6项认知评估、一项小数标签评估以及3项小数大小理解测量(即,将小数与分数[公式:见正文]进行比较的基准任务、估计小数在0 - 1数轴上的位置,以及识别分数和小数的等价关系)。每项一般领域认知能力都预测了学生对小数大小的理解。使用位值标签与学生对小数大小的理解呈正相关,而使用整数标签与学生对小数大小的理解呈负相关。语言理解、非言语推理和概念形成与学生对位值标签的使用呈正相关。相比之下,语言理解和非言语推理与学生对整数标签的使用呈负相关。文中讨论了对小数大小理解发展的启示以及针对高危学生的有效教学设计。

相似文献

4
Malleability of whole-number and fraction biases in decimal comparison.小数比较中整数和分数偏见的可塑化。
Dev Psychol. 2019 Nov;55(11):2263-2274. doi: 10.1037/dev0000797. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
5
Cross-notation knowledge of fractions and decimals.分数和小数的交叉注释知识。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2022 Jan;213:105210. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105210. Epub 2021 Aug 24.

本文引用的文献

2
Error Patterns in Ordering Fractions Among At-Risk Fourth-Grade Students.高危四年级学生在分数排序中的错误模式。
J Learn Disabil. 2017 May/Jun;50(3):337-352. doi: 10.1177/0022219416629647. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
7
Decimals are not processed automatically, not even as being smaller than one.小数不会被自动处理,即使其小于1也不会。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Jul;40(4):962-75. doi: 10.1037/a0035782. Epub 2014 Feb 17.
8
Sources of individual differences in children's understanding of fractions.儿童分数理解中个体差异的来源。
Child Dev. 2014 Jul-Aug;85(4):1461-76. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12218. Epub 2014 Jan 16.
9
Magnitude comparison with different types of rational numbers.不同类型有理数的大小比较。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Feb;40(1):71-82. doi: 10.1037/a0032916. Epub 2013 Jun 10.
10
Developmental predictors of fraction concepts and procedures.分数概念和运算的发展预测。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2013 Sep;116(1):45-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.02.001. Epub 2013 Mar 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验