Youssefi Pouya, Gomez Alberto, Arthurs Christopher, Sharma Rajan, Jahangiri Marjan, Alberto Figueroa C
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, St. George's Hospital, London SW17 0QT, UK.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London SE1 7EH, UK e-mail: .
J Biomech Eng. 2018 Jan 1;140(1). doi: 10.1115/1.4037857.
Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) provides a noninvasive method to functionally assess aortic hemodynamics. The thoracic aorta has an anatomically complex inlet comprising of the aortic valve and root, which is highly prone to different morphologies and pathologies. We investigated the effect of using patient-specific (PS) inflow velocity profiles compared to idealized profiles based on the patient's flow waveform. A healthy 31 yo with a normally functioning tricuspid aortic valve (subject A), and a 52 yo with a bicuspid aortic valve (BAV), aortic valvular stenosis, and dilated ascending aorta (subject B) were studied. Subjects underwent MR angiography to image and reconstruct three-dimensional (3D) geometric models of the thoracic aorta. Flow-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was acquired above the aortic valve and used to extract the patient-specific velocity profiles. Subject B's eccentric asymmetrical inflow profile led to highly complex velocity patterns, which were not replicated by the idealized velocity profiles. Despite having identical flow rates, the idealized inflow profiles displayed significantly different peak and radial velocities. Subject A's results showed some similarity between PS and parabolic inflow profiles; however, other parameters such as Flowasymmetry were significantly different. Idealized inflow velocity profiles significantly alter velocity patterns and produce inaccurate hemodynamic assessments in the thoracic aorta. The complex structure of the aortic valve and its predisposition to pathological change means the inflow into the thoracic aorta can be highly variable. CFD analysis of the thoracic aorta needs to utilize fully PS inflow boundary conditions in order to produce truly meaningful results.
计算流体动力学(CFD)提供了一种非侵入性方法来功能性评估主动脉血流动力学。胸主动脉具有解剖结构复杂的入口,包括主动脉瓣和主动脉根部,极易出现不同的形态和病变。我们研究了与基于患者血流波形的理想化流速剖面相比,使用患者特异性(PS)流入流速剖面的效果。研究了一名31岁健康的、三尖瓣主动脉瓣功能正常的受试者(受试者A),以及一名52岁患有二叶式主动脉瓣(BAV)、主动脉瓣狭窄和升主动脉扩张的受试者(受试者B)。受试者接受了磁共振血管造影,以成像和重建胸主动脉的三维(3D)几何模型。在主动脉瓣上方采集流动磁共振成像(MRI),并用于提取患者特异性流速剖面。受试者B的偏心不对称流入剖面导致了高度复杂的流速模式,而理想化流速剖面无法复制这些模式。尽管流速相同,但理想化流入剖面显示出显著不同的峰值和径向速度。受试者A的结果显示PS和抛物线流入剖面之间存在一些相似性;然而,其他参数如血流不对称性则有显著差异。理想化流入流速剖面会显著改变流速模式,并在胸主动脉中产生不准确的血流动力学评估。主动脉瓣的复杂结构及其易发生病理变化的倾向意味着流入胸主动脉的血流可能高度可变。对胸主动脉的CFD分析需要利用完全PS流入边界条件,以便产生真正有意义的结果。