• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

土耳其妇产科医生的防御性医疗行为。

Defensive medicine among obstetricians and gynaecologists in Turkey.

作者信息

Küçük Mert

机构信息

a Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology , Mugla Sitki Kocman University , Mugla , Turkey.

b Department of Medical Education and Bioinformatics , Mugla Sitki Kocman University , Mugla , Turkey.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Feb;38(2):200-205. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2017.1340933. Epub 2017 Sep 11.

DOI:10.1080/01443615.2017.1340933
PMID:28891358
Abstract

In recent years, there has been a remarkable increase in medical malpractice litigations against OB/GYNs in Turkey and globally. This high litigation atmosphere may have changed attitudes, behaviour and practice of OB/GYNs. In the current study, opinions and attitudes of OB/GYNs regarding defensive medicine and to what extent they practice it were investigated. One hundred and eight OB/GYNs participated in the study. All participants found obstetrics and gynaecology riskier when compared with other medical branches and reported that they were increasingly practising defensive medicine. The majority of the OB/GYNs stated that they abstained from many risky interventions and expressed their belief that the high caesarean section (C-section) rate was associated with medico-legal concerns. The majority of the participants supported enacting of a specific medical malpractice law and supported the establishment of medically specialised courts. These regulations demanded by OB/GYNs should be taken into account by health authorities. Impact statement What is already known on this subject: In recent years, there has been a remarkable increase in medical malpractice litigations against OB/GYNs in Turkey and globally. Turkey has serious problems with the high C-section rate, which has been suggested to be related to medicolegal issues in a previous research. Fifty-one percent of babies, namely most of them, are delivered via C-section. There is no specific medical malpractice law and medically specialised court in Turkey. What the results of this study add: It seems like there is a professional liability crisis among OB/GYNs in Turkey. OB/GYNs reported that they were increasingly practising defensive medicine, and stated that they abstained from many risky interventions. A high C-section rate was found to be related to medicolegal concerns in OB/GYNs' perspective in the current study. OB/GYNs demanded some reasonable regulations. What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research: Regulations demanded by OB/GYNs, which were probed in the current study, such as enacting a specific medical malpractice law and establishment of a medically specialised court, should be taken into account by health authorities in Turkey. The findings of the current study is believed to produce important results for the success of Health transformation programme put into practice in Turkey, which was not able to stop increasing C-section rates. Studies evaluating the direct or indirect costs related to defensive medicine practices of OB/GYNs in Turkey should be performed in subsequent research.

摘要

近年来,土耳其乃至全球针对妇产科医生的医疗事故诉讼显著增加。这种高诉讼氛围可能改变了妇产科医生的态度、行为和执业方式。在本研究中,调查了妇产科医生对防御性医疗的看法和态度以及他们在多大程度上实施防御性医疗。108名妇产科医生参与了该研究。所有参与者都认为与其他医学分支相比,妇产科风险更高,并报告称他们越来越多地实施防御性医疗。大多数妇产科医生表示他们避免了许多有风险的干预措施,并表示他们认为高剖宫产率与医疗法律问题有关。大多数参与者支持制定一部专门的医疗事故法,并支持设立医学专业法庭。卫生当局应考虑妇产科医生提出的这些规定。影响声明关于该主题已有的了解:近年来,土耳其乃至全球针对妇产科医生的医疗事故诉讼显著增加。土耳其剖宫产率居高不下,存在严重问题,先前的一项研究表明这可能与医疗法律问题有关。51%的婴儿,即大多数婴儿,通过剖宫产分娩。土耳其没有专门的医疗事故法和医学专业法庭。本研究的结果补充了什么:土耳其妇产科医生似乎面临职业责任危机。妇产科医生报告称他们越来越多地实施防御性医疗,并表示他们避免了许多有风险的干预措施。在本研究中,从妇产科医生的角度来看,高剖宫产率与医疗法律问题有关。妇产科医生要求一些合理的规定。这些发现对临床实践和/或进一步研究有何影响:本研究中调查的妇产科医生要求的规定,如制定一部专门的医疗事故法和设立医学专业法庭,土耳其卫生当局应予以考虑。本研究的结果被认为将为土耳其实施的未能阻止剖宫产率上升的健康转型计划的成功产生重要成果。后续研究应开展评估土耳其妇产科医生防御性医疗行为相关直接或间接成本的研究。

相似文献

1
Defensive medicine among obstetricians and gynaecologists in Turkey.土耳其妇产科医生的防御性医疗行为。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Feb;38(2):200-205. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2017.1340933. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
2
The impact of malpractice burden on Michigan obstetrician-gynecologists' career satisfaction.医疗事故负担对密歇根州妇产科医生职业满意度的影响。
Womens Health Issues. 2008 Jul-Aug;18(4):229-37. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2008.02.007.
3
Study on defensive medicine practices among obstetricians and gynecologists who provide breast care.为提供乳房护理的妇产科医生的防御性医疗行为研究。
J Healthc Qual. 2011 May-Jun;33(3):37-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1945-1474.2010.00120.x. Epub 2010 Nov 11.
4
Concept of defensive medicine and litigation among Sudanese doctors working in obstetrics and gynecology.苏丹妇产科医生的防御性医疗观念与诉讼情况
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Feb 9;17:12. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0095-3.
5
Measuring defensive medicine using clinical scenario surveys.使用临床情景调查来衡量防御性医疗行为。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1996 Summer;21(2):185-217. doi: 10.1215/03616878-21-2-185.
6
The attitudes towards defensive medicine among physicians of obstetrics and gynaecology in China: a questionnaire survey in a national congress.中国妇产科医生对防御性医疗的态度:一项在全国性会议上的问卷调查
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 3;8(2):e019752. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019752.
7
Malpractice liability and defensive medicine: a national survey of neurosurgeons.医疗事故责任与防御性医疗:神经外科医生的全国性调查。
PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39237. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039237. Epub 2012 Jun 22.
8
Obstetrician perceptions of the causes of high cesarean delivery rates in Turkey.土耳其产科医生对剖宫产率高的原因的看法。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017 Jul;138(1):100-106. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12172. Epub 2017 May 2.
9
The impact of the medical malpractice crisis on OB-GYNs and patients in southern New Jersey.医疗事故危机对新泽西州南部妇产科医生和患者的影响。
N J Med. 2003 Sep;100(9):12-9.
10
Defensive medicine among high-risk specialist physicians in a volatile malpractice environment.在不稳定的医疗事故环境中,高风险专科医生的防御性医疗行为。
JAMA. 2005 Jun 1;293(21):2609-17. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.21.2609.

引用本文的文献

1
Policy Options for Reducing Defensive Medicine Behaviors: A Multi-Method Study.减少防御性医疗行为的政策选择:一项多方法研究。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2024 Jul 29;38:86. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.38.86. eCollection 2024.
2
Policy recommendations to reduce high cesarean section rate in Türkiye.降低土耳其剖宫产率的政策建议。
Pan Afr Med J. 2024 Jul 2;48:83. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2024.48.83.11726. eCollection 2024.
3
The Chinese version of Defensive Medicine Scale (DMS): reliability and validity test among physicians.中文版防御性医疗量表(DMS):医生群体中的信度和效度检验。
BMC Psychol. 2024 Aug 31;12(1):462. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-01957-6.
4
Striking rise of cesarean section rates in Türkiye: there is a need for a whole new perspective.土耳其剖宫产率的惊人上升:需要全新的视角。
Pan Afr Med J. 2024 May 3;48:6. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2024.48.6.12380. eCollection 2024.
5
Defensive medicine practices as a result of malpractice claims and workplace physical violence: a cross-sectional study from Egypt.出于医疗事故索赔和工作场所身体暴力的防御性医疗实践:来自埃及的一项横断面研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 16;13(1):22371. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47720-6.
6
Behavioural factors associated with fear of litigation as a driver for the increased use of caesarean sections: a scoping review.与诉讼恐惧相关的行为因素是剖宫产增加的驱动因素:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 19;13(4):e070454. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070454.
7
Caesarean Section on Maternal Request-Ethical and Juridic Issues: A Narrative Review.产妇要求剖宫产术的伦理和法律问题:叙事性综述。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Sep 10;58(9):1255. doi: 10.3390/medicina58091255.
8
How defensive medicine is defined in European medical literature: a systematic review.欧洲医学文献中对防御性医疗的定义:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 20;12(1):e057169. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057169.
9
Defensive Medicine in the Management of Cesarean Delivery: A Survey among Italian Physicians.剖宫产管理中的防御性医疗:一项对意大利医生的调查
Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Aug 25;9(9):1097. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9091097.
10
The ethics of practicing defensive medicine in Jordan: a diagnostic study.约旦施行防御性医疗的伦理问题:一项诊断性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Jul 7;22(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00658-8.