• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对头部撞击反应,对自行车骑行者和摩托车骑行者在车辆碰撞中的情况进行对比分析。

Comparative analyses of bicyclists and motorcyclists in vehicle collisions focusing on head impact responses.

作者信息

Wang Xinghua, Peng Yong, Yi Shengen

机构信息

1 School of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, China.

2 Research Laboratory of Hepatobiliary Diseases and Department of General Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.

出版信息

Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2017 Nov;231(11):997-1011. doi: 10.1177/0954411917723674. Epub 2017 Sep 11.

DOI:10.1177/0954411917723674
PMID:28893148
Abstract

To investigate the differences of the head impact responses between bicyclists and motorcyclists in vehicle collisions. A series of vehicle-bicycle and vehicle-motorcycle lateral impact simulations on four vehicle types at seven vehicle speeds (30, 35, 40, 45, 50, 55 and 60 km/h) and three two-wheeler moving speeds (5, 7.5 and 10 km/h for bicycle, 10, 12.5 and 15 km/h for motorcycle) were established based on PC-Crash software. To further comprehensively explore the differences, additional impact scenes with other initial conditions, such as impact angle (0, π/3, 2π/3 and π) and impact position (left, middle and right part of vehicle front-end), also were supplemented. And then, extensive comparisons were accomplished with regard to average head peak linear acceleration, average head impact speed, average head peak angular acceleration, average head peak angular speed and head injury severity. The results showed there were prominent differences of kinematics and body postures for bicyclists and motorcyclists even under same impact conditions. The variations of bicyclist head impact responses with the changing of impact conditions were a far cry from that of motorcyclists. The average head peak linear acceleration, average head impact speed and average head peak angular acceleration values were higher for motorcyclists than for bicyclists in most cases, while the bicyclists received greater average head peak angular speed values. And the head injuries of motorcyclists worsened faster with increased vehicle speed. The results may provide even deeper understanding of two-wheeler safety and contribute to improve the public health affected by road traffic accidents.

摘要

为了研究在车辆碰撞中骑自行车者和骑摩托车者头部撞击反应的差异。基于PC-Crash软件,针对四种车型、七种车速(30、35、40、45、50、55和60公里/小时)以及三种两轮车行驶速度(自行车为5、7.5和10公里/小时,摩托车为10、12.5和15公里/小时)进行了一系列车辆-自行车和车辆-摩托车侧面碰撞模拟。为了进一步全面探究差异,还补充了其他初始条件的碰撞场景,如碰撞角度(0、π/3、2π/3和π)以及碰撞位置(车辆前端的左、中、右部分)。然后,对平均头部峰值线性加速度、平均头部撞击速度、平均头部峰值角加速度、平均头部峰值角速度和头部损伤严重程度进行了广泛比较。结果表明,即使在相同的碰撞条件下,骑自行车者和骑摩托车者的运动学和身体姿势也存在显著差异。骑自行车者头部撞击反应随碰撞条件变化的情况与骑摩托车者的情况大不相同。在大多数情况下,骑摩托车者的平均头部峰值线性加速度、平均头部撞击速度和平均头部峰值角加速度值高于骑自行车者,而骑自行车者的平均头部峰值角速度值更大。并且,随着车速增加,骑摩托车者的头部损伤恶化得更快。这些结果可能有助于更深入地理解两轮车安全问题,并有助于改善受道路交通事故影响的公众健康状况。

相似文献

1
Comparative analyses of bicyclists and motorcyclists in vehicle collisions focusing on head impact responses.针对头部撞击反应,对自行车骑行者和摩托车骑行者在车辆碰撞中的情况进行对比分析。
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2017 Nov;231(11):997-1011. doi: 10.1177/0954411917723674. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
2
The protective effect of helmet use in motorcycle and bicycle accidents: a propensity score-matched study based on a trauma registry system.头盔在摩托车和自行车事故中的保护作用:基于创伤登记系统的倾向得分匹配研究。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Aug 7;17(1):639. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4649-1.
3
A population-based case-control study of hospitalisation due to head injuries among bicyclists and motorcyclists in Taiwan.一项基于人群的病例对照研究,旨在探讨台湾地区自行车骑手和摩托车骑手因头部受伤住院的情况。
BMJ Open. 2017 Nov 8;7(11):e018574. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018574.
4
A study of bicyclist kinematics and injuries based on reconstruction of passenger car-bicycle accident in China.基于中国乘用车与自行车事故重建的自行车骑行者运动学与损伤研究
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Oct;71:50-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.04.021. Epub 2014 May 28.
5
Are riders of electric two-wheelers safer than bicyclists in collisions with motor vehicles?与机动车碰撞时,电动两轮车骑手比骑自行车的人更安全吗?
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Jan;134:105336. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.105336. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
6
Differences in severity of injuries between motorcyclist and bicyclist fatalities in single vehicle collisions.单车碰撞中摩托车手与自行车手死亡案例的损伤严重程度差异。
J Forensic Leg Med. 2020 Feb;70:101917. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2020.101917. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
7
A comparison of motorcycle and bicycle accidents in oral and maxillofacial trauma.口腔颌面部创伤中摩托车事故与自行车事故的比较。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Mar;70(3):577-83. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.03.035. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
8
Comparison of traffic-injury related hospitalisation between bicyclists and motorcyclists in Taiwan.台湾自行车骑行者与摩托车骑行者交通伤相关住院情况的比较。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 17;13(1):e0191221. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191221. eCollection 2018.
9
Injuries of motorcyclists and bicyclists examined at autopsy.
Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 1999 Sep;20(3):251-5. doi: 10.1097/00000433-199909000-00007.
10
Injury severity of pedestrians, bicyclists and motorcyclists resulting from crashes with reversing cars.倒车车辆碰撞导致的行人、骑自行车者和摩托车手的受伤严重程度。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Sep;94:46-51. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.05.010. Epub 2016 May 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Head injury risk prediction for vulnerable road users based on Chinese adult male head data.基于中国成年男性头部数据的弱势道路使用者头部损伤风险预测
Sci Rep. 2025 May 21;15(1):17568. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-01598-8.
2
Methods for fusing uncertain results obtained from different models in accident reconstruction.事故重建中融合不同模型所得不确定结果的方法。
Forensic Sci Res. 2020 Jan 27;7(2):272-278. doi: 10.1080/20961790.2019.1704474. eCollection 2022.