• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

事故重建中融合不同模型所得不确定结果的方法。

Methods for fusing uncertain results obtained from different models in accident reconstruction.

作者信息

Zou Tiefang, He Fenglin

机构信息

School of Automobile and Mechanical Engineering, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha, China.

Key Laboratory of Safety Design and Reliability Technology for Engineering Vehicle, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha, China.

出版信息

Forensic Sci Res. 2020 Jan 27;7(2):272-278. doi: 10.1080/20961790.2019.1704474. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1080/20961790.2019.1704474
PMID:35784422
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9245986/
Abstract

Considering that almost all existing solutions of fusing different reconstructed results require experts' opinions and the issue of how to fuse probabilistic results and mixed results has not been discussed. Two solutions are proposed. The first is based on the Monte Carlo Method (FMCM), while the second is based on the Sub-Interval Technique (FSIT). The method based on FMCM generates sample points according to the distribution of each uncertain result firstly, and then gives out the cumulative distribution function of the final fused result by statistical analysis. The method based on FSIT gets the result fusion interval set according to lower and upper bounds of all interval results and a given length of each sub-interval firstly, and then calculate the weighted matrix of the result fusion interval. As a result, the cumulative distribution function of the final fused result can also be given out by statistical analysis. Finally, three real accidents are given to demonstrate the methods of FMCM and FSIT, the results of which show that both work well in practice.

摘要

考虑到几乎所有现有的融合不同重建结果的解决方案都需要专家意见,并且尚未讨论如何融合概率结果和混合结果的问题。提出了两种解决方案。第一种基于蒙特卡罗方法(FMCM),而第二种基于子区间技术(FSIT)。基于FMCM的方法首先根据每个不确定结果的分布生成样本点,然后通过统计分析给出最终融合结果的累积分布函数。基于FSIT的方法首先根据所有区间结果的上下界和每个子区间的给定长度得到结果融合区间集,然后计算结果融合区间的加权矩阵。结果,最终融合结果的累积分布函数也可以通过统计分析给出。最后,给出了三个实际事故来演示FMCM和FSIT方法,结果表明这两种方法在实际中都表现良好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d25/9245986/adf24e13143e/TFSR_A_1704474_F0004_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d25/9245986/c12c01ee19ee/TFSR_A_1704474_F0001_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d25/9245986/479ceaf0f6d8/TFSR_A_1704474_F0002_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d25/9245986/f8ac52f14ceb/TFSR_A_1704474_F0003_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d25/9245986/adf24e13143e/TFSR_A_1704474_F0004_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d25/9245986/c12c01ee19ee/TFSR_A_1704474_F0001_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d25/9245986/479ceaf0f6d8/TFSR_A_1704474_F0002_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d25/9245986/f8ac52f14ceb/TFSR_A_1704474_F0003_C.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d25/9245986/adf24e13143e/TFSR_A_1704474_F0004_C.jpg

相似文献

1
Methods for fusing uncertain results obtained from different models in accident reconstruction.事故重建中融合不同模型所得不确定结果的方法。
Forensic Sci Res. 2020 Jan 27;7(2):272-278. doi: 10.1080/20961790.2019.1704474. eCollection 2022.
2
Methods for describing different results obtained from different methods in accident reconstruction.在事故重建中描述从不同方法获得的不同结果的方法。
Forensic Sci Int. 2018 Oct;291:253-259. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.08.029. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
3
Methods for analyzing the uncertainty of a reconstructed result in a traffic accident with interval and probabilistic traces.利用区间和概率痕迹分析交通事故重建结果不确定性的方法
Forensic Sci Int. 2017 Jan;270:200-210. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.10.007. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
4
A case-oriented approach for analyzing the uncertainty of a reconstructed result based on the evidence theory.基于证据理论的面向案例的重建结果不确定性分析方法。
Int J Legal Med. 2019 Jul;133(4):1089-1106. doi: 10.1007/s00414-018-1885-6. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
5
Two non-probabilistic methods for uncertainty analysis in accident reconstruction.两种用于事故重建中不确定性分析的非概率方法。
Forensic Sci Int. 2010 May 20;198(1-3):134-7. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.02.006. Epub 2010 Mar 6.
6
A Taylor-Affine Arithmetic for analyzing the calculation result uncertainty in accident reconstruction.一种用于分析事故重建中计算结果不确定性的泰勒仿射算法。
Forensic Sci Int. 2016 Sep;266:502-510. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.07.011. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
7
A new approach for uncertainty analysis of ETW Rider Head Injury Reconstruction via Coupling Response Surface and Monte Carlo methodologies.通过响应面耦合和蒙特卡罗方法对 ETW 骑手头部损伤重建的不确定性分析的新方法。
Forensic Sci Int. 2020 Apr;309:110195. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110195. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
8
Uncertain inverse traffic accident reconstruction by combining the modified arbitrary orthogonal polynomial expansion and novel optimization technique.运用改进的任意正交多项式展开和新型优化技术对不确定的逆交通事故重建。
Forensic Sci Int. 2022 Apr;333:111213. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111213. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
9
Response surface methodology and improved interval analysis method--for analyzing uncertainty in accident reconstruction.响应面法和改进区间分析方法——用于分析事故重建中的不确定性。
Forensic Sci Int. 2012 Oct 10;222(1-3):306-12. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.07.007. Epub 2012 Jul 28.
10
A simple algorithm for analyzing uncertainty of accident reconstruction results.一种用于分析事故重建结果不确定性的简单算法。
Forensic Sci Int. 2015 Dec;257:229-235. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.08.025. Epub 2015 Sep 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Methods for describing different results obtained from different methods in accident reconstruction.在事故重建中描述从不同方法获得的不同结果的方法。
Forensic Sci Int. 2018 Oct;291:253-259. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.08.029. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
2
Optimization analysis in reconstruction of vehicle collision accidents with deficient EDR data.基于缺失事件数据记录器(EDR)数据的车辆碰撞事故重建优化分析
Forensic Sci Int. 2018 Feb;283:103-110. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.12.010. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
3
Performances of the PIPER scalable child human body model in accident reconstruction.
PIPER可扩展儿童人体模型在事故重建中的性能。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 14;12(11):e0187916. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187916. eCollection 2017.
4
Comparative analyses of bicyclists and motorcyclists in vehicle collisions focusing on head impact responses.针对头部撞击反应,对自行车骑行者和摩托车骑行者在车辆碰撞中的情况进行对比分析。
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2017 Nov;231(11):997-1011. doi: 10.1177/0954411917723674. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
5
Car speed estimation based on cross-ratio using video data of car-mounted camera (black box).基于交比并利用车载摄像头(黑匣子)视频数据的车速估计
Forensic Sci Int. 2016 Dec;269:89-96. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.11.014. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
6
Methods for analyzing the uncertainty of a reconstructed result in a traffic accident with interval and probabilistic traces.利用区间和概率痕迹分析交通事故重建结果不确定性的方法
Forensic Sci Int. 2017 Jan;270:200-210. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.10.007. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
7
Calculation reliability in vehicle accident reconstruction.车辆事故重建中的计算可靠性。
Forensic Sci Int. 2016 Jun;263:27-38. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.03.038. Epub 2016 Mar 26.
8
Are electric self-balancing scooters safe in vehicle crash accidents?电动自平衡滑板车在车辆碰撞事故中安全吗?
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Feb;87:102-16. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.10.022. Epub 2015 Dec 4.
9
A simple algorithm for analyzing uncertainty of accident reconstruction results.一种用于分析事故重建结果不确定性的简单算法。
Forensic Sci Int. 2015 Dec;257:229-235. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.08.025. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
10
How accurate is accident data in road safety research? An application of vehicle black box data regarding pedestrian-to-taxi accidents in Korea.道路安全研究中的事故数据有多准确?韩国车辆黑匣子数据在行人与出租车事故中的应用。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Nov;84:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.08.001. Epub 2015 Aug 27.