Cross G D, Barrett R F
Department of Anaesthesia, Odstock Hospital, Salisbury, Wiltshire.
Anaesthesia. 1987 Aug;42(8):845-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1987.tb04108.x.
This study compares the quality and duration of analgesia in two groups of patients aged between 1 and 13 years who received either caudal anaesthesia with plain bupivacaine 0.25% or an iliohypogastric and inguinal nerve block combined with skin infiltration using bupivacaine 0.25% with adrenaline 1:200,000. The results indicate no significant difference in the duration or quality of the analgesia provided by the two techniques. There was no difference in the incidence of vomiting or the time of first micturition between the two groups.
本研究比较了两组年龄在1至13岁之间的患者的镇痛质量和持续时间,这两组患者分别接受了0.25%布比卡因单纯骶管麻醉,或0.25%布比卡因与1:200,000肾上腺素联合的髂腹下神经和腹股沟神经阻滞加局部皮肤浸润。结果表明,两种技术所提供的镇痛持续时间或质量没有显著差异。两组之间呕吐发生率和首次排尿时间没有差异。