• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Bryan颈椎间盘置换术后T1斜率对手术及相邻节段退变的影响。

Impact of T1 slope on surgical and adjacent segment degeneration after Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty.

作者信息

Yang Peng, Li Yongqian, Li Jia, Shen Yong

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Hospital of North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery.

出版信息

Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2017 Aug 29;13:1119-1125. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S138990. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.2147/TCRM.S138990
PMID:28894375
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5584913/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This retrospective study investigated an association between preoperative T1 slope and surgical and adjacent segment degeneration (SASD) after Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty (BCDA) in patients with cervical degenerative disc disease.

METHODS

Based on preoperative standing lateral radiographs, 90 patients were classified according to T1 slope that was higher or lower than the 50th percentile (high T1 or low T1, 28 and 62 patients, respectively). Patients were also classified as SASD or non-SASD (38 and 52 patients, respectively) determined by radiographs at final follow-up. Visual analog scale (VAS) and Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores for neck and arm pain were noted, and changes in the sagittal alignment of the cervical spine (SACS), functional spinal unit (FSU) angle, and FSU range of motion (ROM) were also noted. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the risk factors for SASD.

RESULTS

The overall rate of SASD was 42.2% (38/90). The SACS, FSU angle, FSU ROM, and SASD rates of the high T1 and low T1 slope groups were significantly different at the last follow-up. The NDI and VAS scores of the high T1 slope group were significantly greater than those of the low T1 slope. The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that high T1 slope and endplate coverage discrepancy (ie, residual space behind the prosthesis) were significant risk factors for SASD after BCDA.

CONCLUSION

High T1 slope and endplate coverage discrepancy were associated with SASD after BCDA. Patients with a high preoperative T1 slope have a smaller FSU angle and more neck pain after BCDA.

摘要

背景

本回顾性研究调查了颈椎间盘退变疾病患者行Bryan颈椎间盘置换术(BCDA)后,术前T1斜率与手术及相邻节段退变(SASD)之间的关联。

方法

根据术前站立位侧位X线片,将90例患者按T1斜率高于或低于第50百分位数分为两组(高T1组和低T1组,分别为28例和62例)。根据末次随访时的X线片,患者还被分为SASD组和非SASD组(分别为38例和52例)。记录视觉模拟量表(VAS)和颈部残疾指数(NDI)的颈部及手臂疼痛评分,同时记录颈椎矢状位排列(SACS)、功能脊柱单元(FSU)角度及FSU活动度(ROM)的变化。进行单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析以确定SASD的危险因素。

结果

SASD的总体发生率为42.2%(38/90)。末次随访时,高T1斜率组和低T1斜率组的SACS、FSU角度、FSU ROM及SASD发生率存在显著差异。高T1斜率组的NDI和VAS评分显著高于低T1斜率组。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,高T1斜率和终板覆盖差异(即假体后方的残余间隙)是BCDA术后发生SASD的显著危险因素。

结论

高T1斜率和终板覆盖差异与BCDA术后的SASD相关。术前T1斜率高的患者在BCDA术后FSU角度较小且颈部疼痛更明显。

相似文献

1
Impact of T1 slope on surgical and adjacent segment degeneration after Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty.Bryan颈椎间盘置换术后T1斜率对手术及相邻节段退变的影响。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2017 Aug 29;13:1119-1125. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S138990. eCollection 2017.
2
Preoperative T1 Slope as a Predictor of Change in Cervical Alignment and Range of Motion After Cervical Disc Arthroplasty.术前 T1 斜率可预测颈椎间盘置换术后颈椎排列和活动范围的变化。
Med Sci Monit. 2017 Dec 9;23:5844-5850. doi: 10.12659/msm.906944.
3
Comparison of radiographic changes after ACDF versus Bryan disc arthroplasty in single and bi-level cases.单节段和双节段病例中,ACDF(前路颈椎间盘切除融合术)与Bryan人工椎间盘置换术后影像学变化的比较。
Eur Spine J. 2009 Feb;18(2):218-31. doi: 10.1007/s00586-008-0854-z. Epub 2009 Jan 6.
4
Effects of a cervical disc prosthesis on maintaining sagittal alignment of the functional spinal unit and overall sagittal balance of the cervical spine.颈椎间盘假体对维持功能性脊柱单元矢状位排列及颈椎整体矢状位平衡的影响。
Eur Spine J. 2008 Jan;17(1):20-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-007-0459-y. Epub 2007 Aug 25.
5
Stabilization with the Dynamic Cervical Implant: a novel treatment approach following cervical discectomy and decompression.使用动态颈椎植入物进行稳定化:颈椎间盘切除及减压术后的一种新型治疗方法。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Mar;22(3):237-45. doi: 10.3171/2014.10.SPINE131089. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
6
Surgical outcome of cervical arthroplasty using bryan(r).使用Bryan(r)进行颈椎关节置换术的手术结果。
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2009 Dec;46(6):532-7. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2009.46.6.532. Epub 2009 Dec 31.
7
Adjacent-level arthroplasty following cervical fusion.颈椎融合术后相邻节段关节成形术。
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Feb;42(2):E5. doi: 10.3171/2016.11.FOCUS16412.
8
Clinical outcomes of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty a prospective, randomized, controlled, single site trial with 48-month follow-up.Bryan颈椎间盘置换术的临床结果:一项前瞻性、随机、对照、单中心试验,随访48个月。
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 Aug;23(6):367-71. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181bb8568.
9
Effects of a cervical disc prosthesis on segmental and cervical spine alignment.颈椎间盘假体对节段性及颈椎排列的影响。
Neurosurg Focus. 2004 Sep 15;17(3):E5. doi: 10.3171/foc.2004.17.3.5.
10
Analysis of factors that may influence range of motion after cervical disc arthroplasty.分析可能影响颈椎间盘置换术后活动范围的因素。
Spine J. 2010 Aug;10(8):683-8. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.04.027. Epub 2010 May 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Adjacent segment degeneration after single- and double-level cervical total disc replacement: a cohort with an over 12-year follow-up.单节段和双节段颈椎间盘置换术后邻近节段退变:一项超过 12 年随访的队列研究。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Jan;33(1):232-242. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-08018-3. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
2
Sagittal Balance Parameters after Anterior Cervical Discectomy with Spondylodesis and Arthroplasty Using Endocarbon Endoprosthesis: Results of Randomized Study.颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术与使用碳素内植物关节成形术治疗后矢状位平衡参数:随机研究结果。
Sovrem Tekhnologii Med. 2022;14(4):50-57. doi: 10.17691/stm2022.14.4.06. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Adjacent segment disease requiring reoperation in cervical total disc arthroplasty: A literature review and update.颈椎全椎间盘置换术中需要再次手术的相邻节段疾病:文献综述与更新
J Clin Neurosci. 2017 Mar;37:20-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2016.10.047. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
2
Application of Cervical Arthroplasty With Bryan Cervical Disc: 10-Year Follow-up Results in China.Bryan颈椎间盘置换术的应用:中国10年随访结果
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016 Jan;41(2):111-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001145.
3
Incidence and risk factors analysis of heterotopic ossification after cervical disc replacement.
Sagittal balance of the cervical spine: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
颈椎矢状平衡:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Spine J. 2021 Jun;30(6):1411-1439. doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-06825-0. Epub 2021 Mar 27.
4
Cervical sagittal alignment after Prestige LP cervical disc replacement: radiological results and clinical impacts from a single-center experience.颈椎间盘置换术后颈椎矢状位排列:单中心经验的影像学结果和临床影响。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Jan 15;22(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-03962-x.
5
A review of cervical spine alignment in the normal and degenerative spine.正常及退变脊柱中颈椎排列的综述。
J Spine Surg. 2020 Mar;6(1):106-123. doi: 10.21037/jss.2020.01.10.
6
Association between sagittal balance and adjacent segment degeneration in anterior cervical surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.颈椎前路手术中矢状平衡与邻近节段退变的相关性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Sep 14;20(1):430. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2800-0.
7
Radiological exploration on adjacent segments after total cervical disc replacement with Prodisc-C prosthesis.Prodisc-C 假体全颈椎间盘置换术后邻近节段的放射学研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 May 28;14(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1194-x.
8
Adjacent segment degeneration after fusion spinal surgery-a systematic review.融合脊柱手术后邻近节段退变:系统评价。
Int Orthop. 2019 Apr;43(4):987-993. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4241-z. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
颈椎间盘置换术后异位骨化的发生率及危险因素分析
Chin Med J (Engl). 2014;127(22):3871-5.
4
Sagittal alignment as a predictor of clinical adjacent segment pathology requiring surgery after anterior cervical arthrodesis.颈椎前路融合术后需要手术治疗的临床相邻节段病变的矢状位排列预测因素。
Spine J. 2014 Jul 1;14(7):1228-34. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.09.043. Epub 2013 Oct 23.
5
T1 slope as a predictor of kyphotic alignment change after laminoplasty in patients with cervical myelopathy.颈椎脊髓病患者行椎板成形术后 T1 斜率预测后凸角度alignment change。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jul 15;38(16):E992-7. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182972e1b.
6
A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical investigation comparing PCM cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. 2-year results from the US FDA IDE clinical trial.前瞻性、随机、对照临床试验比较 PCM 颈椎间盘置换与前路颈椎间盘切除融合术。美国 FDA IDE 临床试验 2 年结果。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Jul 1;38(15):E907-18. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318296232f.
7
The predisposing factors for the heterotopic ossification after cervical artificial disc replacement.颈椎人工椎间盘置换术后异位骨化的易患因素。
Spine J. 2013 Sep;13(9):1048-54. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.02.036. Epub 2013 Mar 27.
8
The risk of adjacent-level ossification development after surgery in the cervical spine: are there factors that affect the risk? A systematic review.颈椎手术后邻近节段骨化发展的风险:是否存在影响风险的因素?系统评价。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Oct 15;37(22 Suppl):S65-74. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31826cb8f5.
9
The effects of carpentry on heterotopic ossification and mobility in cervical arthroplasty: determination by computed tomography with a minimum 2-year follow-up: Clinical article.木工对颈椎置换术后异位骨化和活动度的影响:至少 2 年随访的 CT 测定:临床文章。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Jun;16(6):601-9. doi: 10.3171/2012.3.SPINE11436. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
10
The influence of thoracic inlet alignment on the craniocervical sagittal balance in asymptomatic adults.胸廓入口对线对无症状成年人颅颈矢状面平衡的影响。
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012 Apr;25(2):E41-7. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182396301.