Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, 139 Ziqiang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050051, P. R. China.
The Key Laboratory of Orthopedic Biomechanics of Hebei Province, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, 139 Ziqiang Road, Shijiazhuang, 050051, P. R. China.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Sep 22;15(1):434. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01909-x.
Cervical sagittal alignment (CSA) is closely related with cervical disk degeneration and impacts the spinal function, especially in the setting of cervical kyphosis (CK). In this study, we evaluated the influence of cervical sagittal parameters on the development of axial neck pain (ANP) in patients with CK.
Data pertaining to 263 patients with CK who visited the outpatient department of our hospital between January 2012 and December 2018 were retrospective analyzed. The most common symptoms of ANP were neck pain, stiffness, or dullness. Visual analog scale (VAS) was used to evaluate ANP. The following radiographic parameters were evaluated: CK types, C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), thoracic inlet angle (TIA), T1 slope, neck tilt (NT), cranial tilt, and cervical tilt. Sagittal alignment of CK was classified into 2 types: global and regional type. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for ANP.
Patients who complained of ANP were categorized as ANP group (VAS score ≥ 3; n = 92), while those without ANP were categorized as non-ANP group (VAS score < 3; n = 171). There was no significant between-group difference with respect to age (P = 0.196), gender (P = 0.516), TIA (P = 0.139), NT (P = 0.676), CK type (P = 0.533), cranial tilt (P = 0.332), cervical tilt (P = 0.585), or cervical disk degeneration (P = 0.695). The T1 slope and C2-7 SVA in the ANP group were significantly greater than that in the non-ANP group (P < 0.05). On multivariate logistic regression, C2-7 SVA [ odds ratio (OR) 2.318, 95% confidence interval 1.373-4.651, P = 0.003) and T1 slope (OR 2.563, 95% CI 1.186-4.669, P = 0.028) were identified as risk factors for ANP.
Our findings suggest a significant effect of cervical sagittal parameters on the occurrence of ANP in patients with CK. Greater T1 slope and larger C2-7 SVA may lead to the development of neck pain.
颈椎矢状位排列(CSA)与颈椎间盘退变密切相关,并影响脊柱功能,尤其是在颈椎后凸(CK)的情况下。本研究评估了颈椎矢状参数对 CK 患者轴向颈痛(ANP)发展的影响。
回顾性分析 2012 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月期间我院门诊收治的 263 例 CK 患者的数据。ANP 的常见症状为颈部疼痛、僵硬或钝痛。采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)评估 ANP。评估以下影像学参数:CK 类型、C2-7 矢状垂直轴(SVA)、胸入口角(TIA)、T1 斜率、颈部倾斜(NT)、颅倾斜和颈椎倾斜。CK 的矢状排列分为 2 种类型:整体和区域类型。采用多变量逻辑回归分析确定 ANP 的危险因素。
主诉 ANP 的患者分为 ANP 组(VAS 评分≥3;n=92),而无 ANP 的患者分为非 ANP 组(VAS 评分<3;n=171)。两组在年龄(P=0.196)、性别(P=0.516)、TIA(P=0.139)、NT(P=0.676)、CK 类型(P=0.533)、颅倾斜(P=0.332)、颈椎倾斜(P=0.585)或颈椎间盘退变(P=0.695)方面无显著差异。ANP 组的 T1 斜率和 C2-7 SVA 显著大于非 ANP 组(P<0.05)。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,C2-7 SVA[比值比(OR)2.318,95%置信区间 1.373-4.651,P=0.003]和 T1 斜率(OR 2.563,95%CI 1.186-4.669,P=0.028)是 ANP 的危险因素。
我们的研究结果表明,颈椎矢状参数对 CK 患者发生 ANP 有显著影响。较大的 T1 斜率和更大的 C2-7 SVA 可能导致颈痛的发生。