Oker N, Alotaibi Naif H, Reichelt A C, Herman P, Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Albers Andreas E
Department of ORL, Head and Neck Surgery, Hôpital Lariboisière, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, 2 rue Ambroise Paré, 75010, Paris, France.
Université Paris-Diderot Paris VI, Faculté de Médecine, Paris, France.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Nov;274(11):4017-4029. doi: 10.1007/s00405-017-4727-0. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
ORL-students and residents have an ongoing debate about the "best" programme in Europe. Aim of this study was to comparatively assess differences among programmes in training, satisfaction, quality of life (QoL) of residents and recent otorhinolaryngologist (ORL) specialists in France, Germany, Spain, Italy, Austria, and Belgium. A self-administered anonymous questionnaire, structured in ten sections including general information, provided guidance, working environment, training structure, teaching of medical students, publication work, QoL, and satisfaction with training, were emailed to residents and recent ORL specialists. 476 returned questionnaires from 6 countries revealed that daily work hours were the highest in France and Belgium with 11 and 10.4 h on average, respectively. QoL, work conditions, and salary were best in Germany followed by Austria in terms of possibility of part-time contracts, better respect for post-duty day off, and compensation for overtime. Satisfaction with training including support and guidance of seniors was lowest in Italy, but, on the other hand, the publication work and support had a more important place than in other countries. In Belgium, there was some gap between the quality of teaching and feedback from seniors as well as apprenticeship. The highest satisfaction with training was in France and Spain followed by Austria. The study results provide guidance before choosing an ORL training programme in Europe. Country-specific strengths could be included into future harmonization efforts to improve all programmes, facilitate professional exchange and, finally, establish standards-of-care carried out by well-trained doctors also looking after a satisfying work-life balance.
耳鼻喉科专业的学生和住院医师一直在争论欧洲“最佳”培训项目。本研究的目的是比较评估法国、德国、西班牙、意大利、奥地利和比利时的培训项目在住院医师和近期耳鼻喉科专科医生的培训、满意度、生活质量(QoL)方面的差异。一份自行填写的匿名问卷通过电子邮件发送给住院医师和近期的耳鼻喉科专科医生,问卷分为十个部分,包括一般信息、提供的指导、工作环境、培训结构、医学生教学、发表工作、生活质量以及对培训的满意度。来自6个国家的476份回复问卷显示,法国和比利时的每日工作时长最高,平均分别为11小时和10.4小时。就兼职合同的可能性、对下班后休息日的更好尊重以及加班费而言,德国的生活质量、工作条件和薪资最佳,其次是奥地利。意大利对培训(包括上级的支持和指导)的满意度最低,但另一方面,发表工作和支持在意大利比在其他国家更为重要。在比利时,教学质量与上级反馈以及学徒培训之间存在一定差距。对培训满意度最高的是法国和西班牙,其次是奥地利。研究结果为在欧洲选择耳鼻喉科培训项目提供了指导。特定国家的优势可以纳入未来的协调工作中,以改进所有项目,促进专业交流,并最终建立由训练有素的医生实施的医疗护理标准,同时确保他们也能实现令人满意的工作与生活平衡。