Suppr超能文献

甲状腺结节的热消融治疗:射频消融、微波消融和高强度聚焦超声治疗是否同样安全有效?

Thermal ablation of thyroid nodules: are radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation and high intensity focused ultrasound equally safe and effective methods?

机构信息

Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, D-60590, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.

German Centre for Thermoablation of Thyroid Nodules, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Radiol. 2018 Mar;28(3):929-935. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5039-x. Epub 2017 Sep 11.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study compares volume reduction of benign thyroid nodules three months after Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA), Microwave Ablation (MWA) or High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) to evaluate which of these methods is the most effective and safe alternative to thyroidectomy or radioiodine therapy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Ninety-four patients (39 male, 55 female) with a total of 118 benign, symptomatic thyroid nodules were divided into three subgroups. HIFU was applied to 14 patients with small nodules. The other 80 patients were divided up into two groups of 40 patients each for RFA and MWA in the assumption that both methods are comparable effective. The pre-ablative and post-ablative volume was measured by ultrasound.

RESULTS

RFA showed a significant volume reduction of nodules of 50 % (p<0.05), MWA of 44 % (p<0.05) and HIFU of 48 % (p<0.05) three months after ablation. None of the examined ablation techniques caused serious or permanent complications.

CONCLUSION

RFA, MWA and HIFU showed comparable results considering volume reduction. All methods are safe and effective treatments of benign thyroid nodules.

KEY POINTS

• Thermal Ablation can be used to treat benign thyroid nodules • Thermal Ablation can be an alternative to thyroidectomy or radioiodine therapy • Radiofrequency Ablation, Microwave Ablation, High Intensity Focused Ultrasound are safe and effective.

摘要

目的

本研究比较射频消融(RFA)、微波消融(MWA)或高强度聚焦超声(HIFU)治疗后 3 个月良性甲状腺结节的体积缩小情况,以评估这些方法中哪一种是甲状腺切除术或放射性碘治疗的最有效和安全替代方法。

材料和方法

94 例(39 例男性,55 例女性)共 118 个良性、有症状的甲状腺结节患者分为三组。14 例小结节患者接受 HIFU 治疗。其余 80 例患者分为 RFA 和 MWA 两组,每组 40 例,假设两种方法的效果相当。消融前和消融后通过超声测量结节体积。

结果

RFA 治疗后 3 个月结节体积缩小 50%(p<0.05),MWA 缩小 44%(p<0.05),HIFU 缩小 48%(p<0.05)。所有检查的消融技术均未引起严重或永久性并发症。

结论

考虑到体积缩小,RFA、MWA 和 HIFU 的结果相当。所有方法均是治疗良性甲状腺结节的安全有效方法。

关键点

• 热消融可用于治疗良性甲状腺结节 • 热消融可作为甲状腺切除术或放射性碘治疗的替代方法 • 射频消融、微波消融、高强度聚焦超声是安全有效的。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验