• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从脊髓损伤纵向老化研究中生成基于 Rasch 的日常生活活动测量。

Generating Rasch-based activity of daily living measures from the Spinal Cord Injury Longitudinal Aging Study.

机构信息

Division of Rehabilitation Sciences, School of Health Professions, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA.

Division of Occupational Therapy, College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.

出版信息

Spinal Cord. 2018 Jan;56(1):14-21. doi: 10.1038/sc.2017.99. Epub 2017 Sep 12.

DOI:10.1038/sc.2017.99
PMID:28895574
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8489270/
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective Longitudinal Study.

OBJECTIVES

(1) To determine whether the Spinal Cord Injury Activities of Daily Living (SCI_ADL) measure shows adequate item-level and precision psychometrics; (2) to investigate whether the SCI_ADL measure effectively detects ADL changes across time; (3) to describe self-care task(s) participants can and cannot do across time.

SETTING

Two Midwestern hospitals and 1 Southeastern specialty hospital in 1993.

METHODS

All participants were adults with traumatic SCI of at least 1-year duration at enrollment. We used 20-year (1993-2013) retrospective longitudinal data and categorized participants into three injury levels: C1-C4 (cervical; n=50), C5-C8 (n=126) and T1-S5 (thoracic, lumbar and sacral; n=168). We first examined psychometrics of the SCI_ADL with factor and Rasch analyses; then we investigated longitudinal change of SCI_ADL scores at three time points over 20 years (1993, 2003 and 2013) using generalized linear mixed modeling and post hoc analyses.

RESULTS

The SCI_ADL measure demonstrated unidimensionality, person strata of 2.9, high Cronbach's α (0.93) and fair person reliability (0.76). T1-S5 had the highest measures, following C5-C8 and C1-C4 at three time points (P<0.05). The C1-C4 and T1-S5 groups showed significant decreases from 2003 to 2013; however, none of the three groups showed significant differences from 1993 to 2003 (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The SCI_ADL measure could detect longitudinal ADL changes of the population with SCI across time. The C1-C4 group decreased the most in ADLs, indicating higher need of long-term services and rehabilitation.

摘要

研究设计

回顾性纵向研究。

研究目的

(1)确定脊髓损伤日常生活活动(SCI_ADL)量表在项目水平和精度心理测量学上是否具有足够的表现;(2)研究 SCI_ADL 量表是否能有效地检测到随时间变化的日常生活活动变化;(3)描述参与者在不同时间内能够完成和无法完成的自我护理任务。

设置

1993 年在中西部的两家医院和东南部的一家专科医院进行。

方法

所有参与者均为入组时患有至少 1 年外伤性 SCI 的成年人。我们使用 20 年(1993-2013 年)的回顾性纵向数据,并将参与者分为三个损伤级别:C1-C4(颈椎;n=50)、C5-C8(n=126)和 T1-S5(胸、腰和骶;n=168)。我们首先使用因子分析和 Rasch 分析检查 SCI_ADL 的心理计量学表现;然后,我们使用广义线性混合模型和事后分析,研究了 20 年内三个时间点(1993 年、2003 年和 2013 年)SCI_ADL 评分的纵向变化。

结果

SCI_ADL 量表表现出单维性、2.9 个人层次、高 Cronbach's α(0.93)和中等个人可靠性(0.76)。T1-S5 在三个时间点的得分最高,其次是 C5-C8 和 C1-C4(P<0.05)。C1-C4 和 T1-S5 组从 2003 年到 2013 年显著下降;然而,三组之间从 1993 年到 2003 年都没有显著差异(P<0.05)。

结论

SCI_ADL 量表能够检测到 SCI 人群随时间推移的日常生活活动的纵向变化。C1-C4 组的日常生活活动下降最多,表明需要长期服务和康复。

相似文献

1
Generating Rasch-based activity of daily living measures from the Spinal Cord Injury Longitudinal Aging Study.从脊髓损伤纵向老化研究中生成基于 Rasch 的日常生活活动测量。
Spinal Cord. 2018 Jan;56(1):14-21. doi: 10.1038/sc.2017.99. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
2
An ADL measure for spinal cord injury.一种用于脊髓损伤的日常生活活动能力测量方法。
J Appl Meas. 2011;12(3):279-97.
3
Psychometric Testing and Clinical Utility of a Modified Version of the Function in Sitting Test for Individuals With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury.改良版坐立功能测试在慢性脊髓损伤患者中的心理测量学测试和临床应用。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Nov;101(11):1961-1972. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.06.014. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
4
Spinal Cord Independence Measure, version III: applicability to the UK spinal cord injured population.脊髓独立测量量表,第三版:对英国脊髓损伤人群的适用性。
J Rehabil Med. 2009 Sep;41(9):723-8. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0398.
5
Despite limitations in content range, the SCIM-III is reproducible and a valid indicator of physical function in youths with spinal cord injury and dysfunction.尽管在内容范围上存在局限性,但脊髓损伤和功能障碍青少年身体能力量表第三版(SCIM-III)具有可重复性,是身体功能的有效指标。
Spinal Cord. 2018 Apr;56(4):332-340. doi: 10.1038/s41393-017-0036-0. Epub 2017 Dec 22.
6
Towards the development of clinical measures for spinal cord injury based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health with Rasch analyses.基于《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》的脊髓损伤临床评估方法的发展:Rasch 分析。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Sep;95(9):1685-94. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.05.006. Epub 2014 May 29.
7
Spinal cord ability ruler: an interval scale to measure volitional performance after spinal cord injury.脊髓能力标尺:一种用于测量脊髓损伤后意志表现的等距量表。
Spinal Cord. 2017 Aug;55(8):730-738. doi: 10.1038/sc.2017.1. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
8
Spinal Cord Injury-Functional Index/Assistive Technology Short Forms.脊髓损伤-功能指数/辅助技术简表
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Oct;97(10):1745-1752.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.03.029. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
9
Spinal Cord Injury-Functional Index/Capacity: Responsiveness to Change Over Time.脊髓损伤功能指数/能力:随时间变化的反应性。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2022 Feb;103(2):199-206. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.10.005. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
10
Impact of Upper Limb Motor Recovery on Functional Independence After Traumatic Low Cervical Spinal Cord Injury.创伤性低位颈脊髓损伤后上肢运动恢复对功能独立性的影响
J Neurotrauma. 2024 May;41(9-10):1211-1222. doi: 10.1089/neu.2023.0140. Epub 2024 Apr 5.

引用本文的文献

1
The relationships between physical function, nutrition, cognitive function, depression, and sleep quality for facility-dwelling older adults with dynapenia.衰弱症与躯体功能、营养、认知功能、抑郁和睡眠质量的关系:居住在设施中的老年人。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 May 8;23(1):278. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-03847-9.
2
Addressing the Gap: Occupational Therapy in Hospice Care.弥补差距:临终关怀中的职业治疗。
Occup Ther Health Care. 2021 Apr;35(2):125-137. doi: 10.1080/07380577.2021.1879410. Epub 2021 Feb 5.

本文引用的文献

1
The natural course of spinal cord injury: changes over 40 years among those with exceptional survival.脊髓损伤的自然病程:40年间超长生存期患者的变化情况
Spinal Cord. 2017 May;55(5):502-508. doi: 10.1038/sc.2016.159. Epub 2016 Dec 6.
2
Association Between Time to Rehabilitation and Outcomes After Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury.创伤性脊髓损伤后康复时间与预后的关联
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Oct;97(10):1620-1627.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.05.009. Epub 2016 Jun 5.
3
Metric properties of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure - Self Report in a community survey.脊髓独立测量-自我报告在社区调查中的度量属性。
J Rehabil Med. 2016 Feb;48(2):149-64. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2059.
4
SCI Longitudinal Aging Study: 40 Years of Research.《科学引文索引》纵向老化研究:40年的研究历程。
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2015 Summer;21(3):189-200. doi: 10.1310/sci2103-189. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
5
Inpatient rehabilitation outcomes in patients with malignant spinal cord compression compared to other non-traumatic spinal cord injury: A population based study.与其他非创伤性脊髓损伤相比,恶性脊髓压迫患者的住院康复结局:一项基于人群的研究。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2015 Nov;38(6):754-64. doi: 10.1179/2045772314Y.0000000278. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
6
Self-scoring templates for motor and cognitive subscales of the FIM instrument for persons with spinal cord injury.脊髓损伤患者 FIM 工具运动和认知分量表的自我评分模板。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Apr;95(4):676-679.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.11.009. Epub 2013 Dec 3.
7
Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis of the PROMIS pain quality item bank.探索性和验证性因子分析 PROMIS 疼痛质量项目库。
Qual Life Res. 2014 Feb;23(1):245-55. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0467-9. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
8
Development and initial evaluation of the spinal cord injury-functional index.脊髓损伤功能指数的制定与初步评估。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Oct;93(10):1733-50. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.05.008. Epub 2012 May 17.
9
Activity and participation after spinal cord injury: state-of-the-art report.脊髓损伤后的活动与参与:最新报告
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2012;49(1):155-74. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2010.06.0108.
10
Social support and life satisfaction in spinal cord injury during and up to one year after inpatient rehabilitation.脊髓损伤患者在住院康复期间和康复后一年的社会支持和生活满意度。
J Rehabil Med. 2010 Mar;42(3):265-71. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0502.