Center for Health Outcomes Research, United BioSource Corporation, 7101 Wisconsin Ave., Suite 600, Bethesda, MD, 20814, USA,
Qual Life Res. 2014 Feb;23(1):245-55. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0467-9. Epub 2013 Jul 9.
The assessment of pain sensation and quality is a key component in understanding the experience of individuals with chronic pain. This study evaluated the factor structure of the patient-reported outcome measurement information system (PROMIS) pain quality item bank.
As part of the PROMIS project, we developed a pool of 37 pain quality items, based on a review of existing pain questionnaires and development of new items. A web-based survey was designed and completed by 845 members of the general population and 967 individuals with different types of chronic pain. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted on a random split-half sample of the data to examine the factor structure of the 37 PROMIS pain quality items in the general population and in a chronic pain sample. A confirmatory factor analysis was conducted in the holdout sample.
The EFA of the pain quality items resulted in comparable six-factor solutions for the general and chronic pain samples: (1) pulling/tugging pain; (2) tingling/numbness pain; (3) sharp/stabbing pain; (4) dull/aching pain; (5) pounding/pulsing pain; and (6) affective pain. The confirmatory factor analysis in the holdout sample supported this factor structure.
Further research is needed to evaluate the psychometric characteristics of the derived scales based on their factor scores.
疼痛感觉和质量的评估是理解慢性疼痛患者体验的关键组成部分。本研究评估了患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)疼痛质量项目库的因子结构。
作为 PROMIS 项目的一部分,我们基于对现有疼痛问卷的回顾和新项 目的开发,创建了一个包含 37 个疼痛质量项目的题库。设计并完成了一个基于网络的调查,调查对象为普通人群中的 845 名成员和患有不同类型慢性疼痛的 967 名个体。对数据的随机半分割样本进行探索性因子分析(EFA),以检验普通人群和慢性疼痛样本中 37 个 PROMIS 疼痛质量项目的因子结构。在保留样本中进行验证性因子分析。
疼痛质量项目的 EFA 为普通人群和慢性疼痛样本产生了类似的六因子解决方案:(1)牵拉/拉扯样疼痛;(2)刺痛/麻木样疼痛;(3)锐痛/刺痛样疼痛;(4)钝痛/隐痛样疼痛;(5)搏动/脉冲样疼痛;和(6)情感性疼痛。保留样本中的验证性因子分析支持这一因子结构。
需要进一步研究基于因子得分的衍生量表的心理测量特性。