• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

按社会经济群体估算癌症诊断对英格兰一系列癌症类型预期寿命的影响。

Estimating the impact of a cancer diagnosis on life expectancy by socio-economic group for a range of cancer types in England.

作者信息

Syriopoulou Elisavet, Bower Hannah, Andersson Therese M-L, Lambert Paul C, Rutherford Mark J

机构信息

Biostatistics Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Centre for Medicine, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK.

Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 2017 Oct 24;117(9):1419-1426. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.300. Epub 2017 Sep 12.

DOI:10.1038/bjc.2017.300
PMID:28898233
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5672926/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Differences in cancer survival exist across socio-economic groups for many cancer types. Standard metrics fail to show the overall impact for patients and the population.

METHODS

The available data consist of a population of ∼2.5 million patients and include all patients recorded as being diagnosed with melanoma, prostate, bladder, breast, colon, rectum, lung, ovarian and stomach cancers in England between 1998 and 2013. We estimated the average loss in expectation of life per patient in years and the proportion of life lost for a range of cancer types, separately by deprivation group. In addition, estimates for the total number of years lost due to each cancer were also obtained.

RESULTS

Lung and stomach cancers result in the highest overall loss for males and females in all deprivation groups in terms of both absolute life years lost and loss as a proportion of expected life remaining. Female lung cancer patients in the least- and most-deprived group lose 14.4 and 13.8 years on average, respectively, that is translated as 86.1% and 87.3% of their average expected life years remaining. Melanoma, prostate and breast cancers have the lowest overall loss. On the basis of the number of patients diagnosed in 2013, lung cancer results in the most life years lost in total followed by breast cancer. Melanoma and bladder cancer account for the lowest total life years lost.

CONCLUSIONS

There are wide differences in the impact of cancer on life expectancy across deprivation groups, and for most cancers the most affluent lose less years.

摘要

背景

对于多种癌症类型,社会经济群体之间的癌症生存率存在差异。标准指标未能显示出对患者和人群的总体影响。

方法

现有数据包括约250万患者,涵盖1998年至2013年期间在英格兰被记录诊断为黑色素瘤、前列腺癌、膀胱癌、乳腺癌、结肠癌、直肠癌、肺癌、卵巢癌和胃癌的所有患者。我们分别按贫困程度组估算了每种癌症类型每位患者预期寿命的平均损失年数以及生命损失比例。此外,还获得了每种癌症导致的总损失年数估计值。

结果

就绝对生命损失年数以及作为剩余预期寿命的比例损失而言,肺癌和胃癌在所有贫困程度组中导致男性和女性的总体损失最高。最贫困和最富裕组的女性肺癌患者平均分别损失14.4年和13.8年,这相当于她们剩余平均预期寿命的86.1%和87.3%。黑色素瘤、前列腺癌和乳腺癌的总体损失最低。根据2013年诊断出的患者数量,肺癌导致的总生命损失年数最多,其次是乳腺癌。黑色素瘤和膀胱癌导致的总生命损失年数最低。

结论

不同贫困程度组中癌症对预期寿命的影响存在很大差异,对于大多数癌症而言,最富裕人群损失的年数较少。

相似文献

1
Estimating the impact of a cancer diagnosis on life expectancy by socio-economic group for a range of cancer types in England.按社会经济群体估算癌症诊断对英格兰一系列癌症类型预期寿命的影响。
Br J Cancer. 2017 Oct 24;117(9):1419-1426. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.300. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
2
Italian cancer figures--Report 2015: The burden of rare cancers in Italy.意大利癌症数据——2015年报告:意大利罕见癌症的负担
Epidemiol Prev. 2016 Jan-Feb;40(1 Suppl 2):1-120. doi: 10.19191/EP16.1S2.P001.035.
3
Understanding the impact of socioeconomic differences in breast cancer survival in England and Wales: avoidable deaths and potential gain in expectation of life.了解英格兰和威尔士社会经济差异对乳腺癌生存率的影响:可避免的死亡和预期寿命的潜在增长。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2015 Feb;39(1):118-25. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2014.11.002. Epub 2014 Nov 28.
4
Impact of cancer diagnosis on life expectancy by area-level socioeconomic groups in New South Wales, Australia: a population-based study.澳大利亚新南威尔士州按地区社会经济群体划分的癌症诊断对预期寿命的影响:一项基于人群的研究。
Cancer Biol Med. 2024 Jul 22;21(8):692-702. doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2024.0166.
5
Income disparities in loss in life expectancy after colon and rectal cancers: a Swedish register-based study.结直肠癌患者预期寿命损失的收入差距:一项瑞典基于登记的研究。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2024 May 9;78(6):402-408. doi: 10.1136/jech-2024-221916.
6
Italian cancer figures, report 2014: Prevalence and cure of cancer in Italy.《2014年意大利癌症数据报告:意大利癌症的患病率与治愈率》
Epidemiol Prev. 2014 Nov-Dec;38(6 Suppl 1):1-122. doi: 10.19191/EP14.6.S1.113.
7
Does minimum follow-up time post-diagnosis matter? An assessment of changing loss of life expectancy for people with cancer in Western Australia from 1982 to 2016.诊断后最短随访时间是否重要?1982 年至 2016 年澳大利亚西部癌症患者预期寿命损失变化的评估。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2020 Jun;66:101705. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2020.101705. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
8
Expected years of life lost for six potentially preventable cancers in the United States.美国六种潜在可预防癌症的预期寿命损失。
Prev Med. 2013 May;56(5):309-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.02.003. Epub 2013 Feb 19.
9
Socio-economic inequalities in cancer survival: how do they translate into Number of Life-Years Lost?癌症生存的社会经济不平等:它们如何转化为生命年损失数?
Br J Cancer. 2022 Jun;126(10):1490-1498. doi: 10.1038/s41416-022-01720-x. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
10
Italian cancer figures, report 2013: Multiple tumours.《2013年意大利癌症数据报告:多发性肿瘤》
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Jul-Oct;37(4-5 Suppl 1):1-152.

引用本文的文献

1
Global, regional, and national burden of high body-mass index-related cancers and associated preventable life expectancy loss from 1990 to 2021.1990年至2021年全球、区域和国家高体重指数相关癌症负担及相关可预防的预期寿命损失
Front Nutr. 2025 Aug 19;12:1641276. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2025.1641276. eCollection 2025.
2
Impact of cancer diagnosis on life expectancy by area-level socioeconomic groups in New South Wales, Australia: a population-based study.澳大利亚新南威尔士州按地区社会经济群体划分的癌症诊断对预期寿命的影响:一项基于人群的研究。
Cancer Biol Med. 2024 Jul 22;21(8):692-702. doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2024.0166.
3

本文引用的文献

1
What might explain deprivation-specific differences in the excess hazard of breast cancer death amongst screen-detected women? Analysis of patients diagnosed in the West Midlands region of England from 1989 to 2011.如何解释筛查发现的女性乳腺癌死亡超额风险中特定贫困程度的差异?对1989年至2011年在英格兰西米德兰兹地区确诊的患者进行分析。
Oncotarget. 2016 Aug 2;7(31):49939-49947. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.10255.
2
Life Expectancy of Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Approaches the Life Expectancy of the General Population.慢性髓性白血病患者的预期寿命接近普通人群。
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Aug 20;34(24):2851-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.66.2866. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
3
Impacts of socioeconomic and environmental factors on neoplasms incidence rates using machine learning and GIS: a cross-sectional study in Iran.
利用机器学习和 GIS 分析社会经济和环境因素对肿瘤发病率的影响:伊朗的一项横断面研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 8;14(1):10604. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-61397-5.
4
Heterogeneous trends of premature mortalities in Japan: joinpoint regression analysis of years of life lost from 2011 to 2019.日本过早死亡的异质性趋势:2011年至2019年寿命损失年数的连接点回归分析
Dialogues Health. 2022 Nov 9;1:100071. doi: 10.1016/j.dialog.2022.100071. eCollection 2022 Dec.
5
Therapeutic Approaches to Increase the Survival Rate of Cancer Patients in the Younger and Older Population.提高年轻和老年癌症患者生存率的治疗方法。
Curr Aging Sci. 2024;17(1):16-30. doi: 10.2174/0118746098241507231127114248.
6
Use of Systemic Therapies for Treatment of Psoriasis in Patients with a History of Treated Solid Tumours: Inference-Based Guidance from a Multidisciplinary Expert Panel.实体肿瘤治疗史患者中使用全身治疗方法治疗银屑病:多学科专家小组基于推断的指导意见
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2023 Apr;13(4):867-889. doi: 10.1007/s13555-023-00905-3. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
7
How do study design features and participant characteristics influence willingness to participate in clinical trials? Results from a choice experiment.研究设计特征和参与者特征如何影响参与临床试验的意愿?来自选择实验的结果。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Dec 16;22(1):323. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01803-6.
8
Time Trends and Income Inequalities in Cancer Incidence and Cancer-Free Life Expectancy - a Cancer Site-Specific Analysis of German Health Insurance Data.癌症发病率和无癌预期寿命的时间趋势及收入不平等——基于德国健康保险数据的癌症部位特异性分析
Front Oncol. 2022 Apr 14;12:827028. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.827028. eCollection 2022.
9
Systematic review of the association between socioeconomic status and bladder cancer survival with hospital type, comorbidities, and treatment delay as mediators.以医院类型、合并症和治疗延迟为中介因素,对社会经济地位与膀胱癌生存率之间关联的系统评价。
BJUI Compass. 2021 Jan 7;2(3):140-158. doi: 10.1002/bco2.65. eCollection 2021 May.
10
Assessing lead time bias due to mammography screening on estimates of loss in life expectancy.评估因乳腺 X 光筛查而导致的预期寿命损失的领先时间偏倚。
Breast Cancer Res. 2022 Feb 23;24(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13058-022-01505-3.
Ethnicity, deprivation and screening: survival from breast cancer among screening-eligible women in the West Midlands diagnosed from 1989 to 2011.
种族、贫困与筛查:1989年至2011年在西米德兰兹郡符合筛查条件的女性中乳腺癌患者的生存情况
Br J Cancer. 2015 Jul 28;113(3):548-55. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.204. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
4
The loss in expectation of life after colon cancer: a population-based study.结肠癌患者预期寿命的损失:一项基于人群的研究。
BMC Cancer. 2015 May 17;15:412. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1427-2.
5
Understanding the impact of socioeconomic differences in breast cancer survival in England and Wales: avoidable deaths and potential gain in expectation of life.了解英格兰和威尔士社会经济差异对乳腺癌生存率的影响:可避免的死亡和预期寿命的潜在增长。
Cancer Epidemiol. 2015 Feb;39(1):118-25. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2014.11.002. Epub 2014 Nov 28.
6
Socioeconomic inequalities in cancer survival: a population-based study of adult patients diagnosed in Osaka, Japan, during the period 1993-2004.癌症生存方面的社会经济不平等:一项基于日本大阪1993 - 2004年期间确诊的成年患者的人群研究。
Acta Oncol. 2014 Oct;53(10):1423-33. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2014.912350. Epub 2014 May 28.
7
Cancer survival: global surveillance will stimulate health policy and improve equity.癌症生存:全球监测将刺激卫生政策并改善公平性。
Lancet. 2014 Feb 8;383(9916):564-73. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62225-4. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
8
Estimating the loss in expectation of life due to cancer using flexible parametric survival models.使用灵活的参数生存模型估计癌症导致的预期寿命损失。
Stat Med. 2013 Dec 30;32(30):5286-300. doi: 10.1002/sim.5943. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
9
How much of the deprivation gap in cancer survival can be explained by variation in stage at diagnosis: an example from breast cancer in the East of England.在癌症生存方面,由于诊断时的分期差异而导致的剥夺差距有多大:来自英格兰东部乳腺癌的一个例子。
Int J Cancer. 2013 Nov;133(9):2192-200. doi: 10.1002/ijc.28221. Epub 2013 May 29.
10
Socioeconomic, Rural-Urban, and Racial Inequalities in US Cancer Mortality: Part I-All Cancers and Lung Cancer and Part II-Colorectal, Prostate, Breast, and Cervical Cancers.美国癌症死亡率中的社会经济、城乡及种族不平等:第一部分——所有癌症和肺癌,第二部分——结直肠癌、前列腺癌、乳腺癌和宫颈癌
J Cancer Epidemiol. 2011;2011:107497. doi: 10.1155/2011/107497. Epub 2012 Feb 14.