• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脑瘫儿童和青少年生活质量与幸福感评估工具的系统评价方案

Protocol for a systematic review of instruments for the assessment of quality of life and well-being in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy.

作者信息

Mpundu-Kaambwa Christine, Chen Gang, Huynh Elisabeth, Russo Remo, Ratcliffe Julie

机构信息

Institute for Choice, University of South Australia Business School, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.

Centre for Health Economics, Monash Business School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 11;7(9):e015924. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015924.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015924
PMID:28899888
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5640099/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Cerebral palsy is the most common cause of physical disability in children and adolescents and is associated with impairments that may reduce the quality of life (QOL) of this population. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) can facilitate the assessment of the effect of disease and treatment on QOL, from a patient viewpoint. The purpose of this systematic review is to identify PROMs that are used to measure QOL and subjective well-being (SWB) outcomes in young people with cerebral palsy and to evaluate the suitability of these PROMs for application in economic evaluations within this population.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

MEDLINE, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science Core Collection, EconLit, PsycINFO, CINAHL, EMBASE and Informit will be systematically searched from inception to date of search. Published peer-reviewed, English-language articles reporting PROMs measuring QOL or SWB outcomes in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy will be included. One reviewer will conduct the initial search and screen titles and abstracts for potentially eligible studies. The search will be performed in November 2017. To reduce the likelihood of reviewer selection bias, two other reviewers will independently screen a randomly selected subsample (10%) of the citations. Two reviewers will then retrieve full texts of potentially eligible studies and assess them against predefined inclusion criteria. The suitability of selected PROMs for use in economic evaluations of young people with cerebral palsy will be assessed using the International Society of Quality of Life Research recommended Minimum Standards and the Patient-Centered Outcomes and Comparative Effectiveness Research checklist. A narrative synthesis of extracted data will be presented including study descriptive data, PROMs measurement properties, settings in which they were applied and the valuation methods. Recommendations for practice on the selection of PROMs for use in economic evaluations of children and adolescents with cerebral palsy will be presented.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not required as the proposed systematic review will not use primary data. The results of this study will be widely disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and conference presentation(s).

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER

International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews number: CRD42016049746.

摘要

引言

脑瘫是儿童和青少年身体残疾的最常见原因,且与可能降低该人群生活质量(QOL)的损伤相关。患者报告结局测量(PROMs)能够从患者角度促进对疾病及治疗对生活质量影响的评估。本系统评价的目的是识别用于测量脑瘫青少年生活质量和主观幸福感(SWB)结局的PROMs,并评估这些PROMs在该人群经济评价中的适用性。

方法与分析

将从创刊至检索日期对MEDLINE、Scopus、Cochrane图书馆、科学引文索引核心合集、EconLit、PsycINFO、护理学与健康领域数据库、EMBASE和Informit进行系统检索。纳入已发表的、经过同行评审的、报告测量脑瘫儿童和青少年生活质量或主观幸福感结局的PROMs的英文文章。一名评审员将进行初始检索,并筛选标题和摘要以查找潜在符合条件的研究。检索将于2017年11月进行。为降低评审员选择偏倚的可能性,另外两名评审员将独立筛选随机抽取的10%的引文子样本。然后,两名评审员将检索潜在符合条件研究的全文,并根据预定义的纳入标准对其进行评估。将使用国际生活质量研究协会推荐的最低标准以及以患者为中心的结局和比较效果研究清单来评估所选PROMs在脑瘫青少年经济评价中的适用性。将对提取的数据进行叙述性综合,包括研究描述性数据、PROMs测量属性、应用环境及评估方法。将给出关于选择用于脑瘫儿童和青少年经济评价的PROMs的实践建议。

伦理与传播

由于拟进行的系统评价不使用原始数据,因此无需伦理批准。本研究结果将通过在同行评审期刊上发表及会议报告进行广泛传播。

系统评价注册号

国际前瞻性系统评价注册编号:CRD42016049746。

相似文献

1
Protocol for a systematic review of instruments for the assessment of quality of life and well-being in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy.脑瘫儿童和青少年生活质量与幸福感评估工具的系统评价方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Sep 11;7(9):e015924. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015924.
2
Measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in adult patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review protocol.用于慢性肾脏病成年患者的患者报告结局测量(PROMs)的测量特性:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 12;6(10):e012014. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012014.
3
Evaluating measures of quality of life in adult scoliosis: a protocol for a systematic review and narrative synthesis.评价成人脊柱侧弯生活质量评估方法:系统评价和叙述性综合的方案。
Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 27;10(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01811-5.
4
Protocol for a systematic review of preference-based instruments for measuring care-related outcomes and their suitability for the palliative care setting.关于用于测量与护理相关结果的基于偏好的工具及其在姑息治疗环境中的适用性的系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 12;6(9):e012181. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012181.
5
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
6
Effectiveness of robotic-assisted therapy for upper extremity function in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy: a systematic review protocol.机器人辅助治疗对脑瘫儿童和青少年上肢功能的有效性:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 11;11(5):e045051. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045051.
7
The suitability of patient-reported outcome measures used to assess the impact of hypoglycaemia on quality of life in people with diabetes: a systematic review using COSMIN methods.用于评估低血糖对糖尿病患者生活质量影响的患者报告结局测量工具的适用性:使用 COSMIN 方法的系统评价。
Diabetologia. 2021 Jun;64(6):1213-1225. doi: 10.1007/s00125-021-05382-x. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
8
International guidelines for self-report and proxy completion of paediatric health-related quality of life measures: a protocol for a systematic review.国际儿童健康相关生活质量自评和代理报告测量工具使用指南:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 8;11(12):e052049. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052049.
9
Measurement properties of quality of life measurement instruments for infants, children and adolescents with eczema: protocol for a systematic review.湿疹婴幼儿及青少年生活质量测量工具的测量属性:系统评价方案
Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 9;5:25. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0202-z.
10
How does the intensity of physical therapy affect the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-66) total score in children with cerebral palsy? A systematic review protocol.物理治疗强度如何影响脑瘫儿童粗大运动功能测量(GMFM-66)总分?系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jul 19;10(7):e036630. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036630.

引用本文的文献

1
A review of preference-based measures for the assessment of quality of life in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy.脑瘫儿童和青少年生活质量评估中基于偏好的测量方法综述。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Jul;27(7):1781-1799. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1837-0. Epub 2018 Mar 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Protocol for a systematic review of preference-based instruments for measuring care-related outcomes and their suitability for the palliative care setting.关于用于测量与护理相关结果的基于偏好的工具及其在姑息治疗环境中的适用性的系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 12;6(9):e012181. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012181.
2
Economic evaluations on centralisation of specialised healthcare services: a systematic review of methods.专科医疗服务集中化的经济评估:方法的系统评价
BMJ Open. 2016 May 6;6(5):e011214. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011214.
3
Health, Health-Related Quality of Life, and Quality of Life: What is the Difference?健康、健康相关生活质量和生活质量:有何区别?
Pharmacoeconomics. 2016 Jul;34(7):645-9. doi: 10.1007/s40273-016-0389-9.
4
Measurement properties of multidimensional patient-reported outcome measures in neurodisability: a systematic review of evaluation studies.神经残疾中多维患者报告结局测量指标的测量属性:评价研究的系统综述
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016 May;58(5):437-51. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12982. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
5
A Checklist for Reporting Valuation Studies of Multi-Attribute Utility-Based Instruments (CREATE).多属性效用工具估值研究报告清单(CREATE)
Pharmacoeconomics. 2015 Aug;33(8):867-77. doi: 10.1007/s40273-015-0292-9.
6
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation.系统评价和荟萃分析议定书的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015:详细说明和解释。
BMJ. 2015 Jan 2;350:g7647. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7647.
7
Estimating productivity costs using the friction cost approach in practice: a systematic review.使用摩擦成本法估算实际生产中的成本:系统综述。
Eur J Health Econ. 2016 Jan;17(1):31-44. doi: 10.1007/s10198-014-0652-y. Epub 2014 Nov 12.
8
Cerebral palsy.脑性瘫痪。
Lancet. 2014 Apr 5;383(9924):1240-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61835-8. Epub 2013 Nov 20.
9
ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research.ISOQOL 建议在以患者为中心的结局和比较效果研究中使用患者报告结局测量,采用最低标准。
Qual Life Res. 2013 Oct;22(8):1889-905. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0344-y. Epub 2013 Jan 4.
10
Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic.组内一致性:kappa 统计量。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(3):276-82.