1 Center for Evidence-Based Medicine and Clinical Research, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei Province, China.
2 Department of Neurology, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei Province, China.
Clin Rehabil. 2018 Apr;32(4):429-439. doi: 10.1177/0269215517729528. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of traditional manual acupuncture combined with rehabilitation therapy versus rehabilitation therapy alone for shoulder hand syndrome after stroke. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Chinese Biomedicine Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, VIP Information Database, Wan Fang Database and reference lists of the eligible studies were searched up to July 2017 for relevant studies. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials that compared the combined effects of traditional manual acupuncture and rehabilitation therapy to rehabilitation therapy alone for shoulder hand syndrome after stroke were included. Two reviewers independently screened the searched records, extracted the data and assessed risk of bias of the included studies. The treatment effect sizes were pooled in a meta-analysis using RevMan 5.3 software. RESULTS: A total of 20 studies involving 1918 participants were included in this study. Compared to rehabilitation therapy alone, the combined therapy significantly reduced pain on the visual analogue scale and improved limb movement on the Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale and the performance of activities of daily living (ADL) on the Barthel Index scale or Modified Barthel Index scale. Of these, the visual analogue scale score changes were significantly higher (mean difference = 1.49, 95% confidence interval = 1.15-1.82, P < 0.00001) favoring the combined therapy after treatment, with severe heterogeneity ( I = 71%, P = 0.0005). CONCLUSION: Current evidence suggests that traditional manual acupuncture integrated with rehabilitation therapy is more effective in alleviating pain, improving limb movement and ADL. However, considering the relatively low quality of available evidence, further rigorously designed and large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the results.
目的:探究传统手动针刺结合康复疗法与单纯康复疗法治疗脑卒中后肩手综合征的疗效。
资料来源:检索 PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆、中国生物医学文献数据库、中国知网、维普数据库、万方数据库,并辅以手工检索纳入研究的参考文献,检索时间截至 2017 年 7 月,查找比较传统手动针刺结合康复疗法与单纯康复疗法治疗脑卒中后肩手综合征的随机对照试验。
方法:两名评价者独立筛选检索结果、提取资料并评价纳入研究的偏倚风险,采用 RevMan 5.3 软件进行荟萃分析。
结果:共纳入 20 项研究,涉及 1918 例患者。与单纯康复疗法相比,联合治疗在视觉模拟评分、Fugl-Meyer 运动评分和 Barthel 指数或改良 Barthel 指数上的日常生活活动能力评分等方面均能更显著地减轻疼痛,改善肢体运动。其中,视觉模拟评分差值的变化差异更显著(均数差=1.49,95%置信区间=1.15~1.82,P<0.00001),提示联合治疗更有效,且存在高度异质性( I²=71%,P=0.0005)。
结论:目前证据表明,传统手动针刺结合康复疗法能更有效地缓解疼痛、改善肢体运动和日常生活活动能力。但是,鉴于纳入研究证据质量普遍较低,还需要进一步设计严格、规模更大的随机对照试验来验证上述结论。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-9-23
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-10-25
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-3-29
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-9-28
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-3-4
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-5-5
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005-10-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-2-6
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-6-12
Front Mol Neurosci. 2023-5-3