Rachmawaty Rini
Hasanuddin University, Indonesia.
Nurs Ethics. 2017 Sep;24(6):686-693. doi: 10.1177/0969733016646156.
Action-oriented research is one of the most frequent research types implemented to transform community health in Indonesia. Three researchers and 11 graduate students from a developed country in East Asia conducted a fieldwork program in a remote area in South Sulawesi Province. Although the project was completed, whether or not the international standards for human subject research were applied into that study remains unclear.
This study aimed to examine ethical issues raised from that case, analyze constraints to the problems, and recommend alternatives to protect vulnerable populations from being exploited by local/international researchers.
A problem-solving approach was used in this study. It began with problem identification, evaluation of the action-oriented research goal, investigation of the constraints to the problem, and recommendation of some relevant alternatives to address the central issue. Ethical Consideration: The approval for conducting the action-oriented research that being investigated in this work was only obtained from the Head of local district.
Some ethical issues were found in this case. No special protection for this population, no informed consent was obtained from the participants, exposure to social and economic risks, no future benefits for the subjects, and conflict of interests. Lack of control from the local research ethics committee and lack of competence of local researchers on human subject research were considered as the constraints to the problems.
Creating an independent research ethics committee, providing research ethics training to the local researchers, obtaining written/video consents from underserved populations, and meeting local health needs were recommended alternatives to solve these problems.
Indonesian government bodies should reform their international collaborative system on research involving human subjects. Exploitation may not occur if all participants as well as all local and national governing bodies understand the research ethics on human subjects and apply it into their practice.
行动导向型研究是印度尼西亚为改善社区健康而开展的最常见的研究类型之一。来自东亚一个发达国家的三名研究人员和11名研究生在南苏拉威西省的一个偏远地区开展了一项实地研究项目。尽管该项目已完成,但该研究是否遵循了国际人体研究标准仍不明确。
本研究旨在探讨该案例中出现的伦理问题,分析问题的制约因素,并提出替代方案,以保护弱势群体不被当地/国际研究人员利用。
本研究采用解决问题的方法。首先是问题识别,评估行动导向型研究目标,调查问题的制约因素,并提出一些相关替代方案以解决核心问题。伦理考量:本研究中所调查的行动导向型研究仅获得了当地区长的批准。
该案例中发现了一些伦理问题。对该人群没有特殊保护,未获得参与者的知情同意,面临社会和经济风险,研究对象没有未来收益,以及存在利益冲突。当地研究伦理委员会缺乏监管以及当地研究人员在人体研究方面缺乏能力被认为是问题的制约因素。
建议设立独立的研究伦理委员会,为当地研究人员提供研究伦理培训,从服务不足的人群中获得书面/视频同意,并满足当地的健康需求,以解决这些问题。
印度尼西亚政府机构应改革其涉及人体研究的国际合作体系。如果所有参与者以及所有地方和国家管理机构都了解人体研究伦理并将其应用于实践,就不会发生剥削行为。