• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荧光杂交分析在上尿路尿路上皮癌检测中的应用

Utility of fluorescence hybridization analysis for detecting upper urinary tract-urothelial carcinoma.

作者信息

Yu Jiang, Xiong Hui, Wei Chunxiao, Cui Zilian, Jin Xunbo, Zhang Jianjun

机构信息

Minimally Invasive Urology Center, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China.

出版信息

J Cancer Res Ther. 2017;13(4):647-650. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_74_17.

DOI:10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_74_17
PMID:28901308
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical utility of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in the detection of upper urinary tract-urothelial carcinoma (UUT-UC).

METHODS

Between November 2011 and November 2015, voided urine specimens from 52 consecutive patients with UUT-UC and 26 controls were collected for both FISH test and cytology. Sensitivity and specificity of FISH test and cytology were determined and compared. The frequency of chromosomal aberrations was also analyzed.

RESULTS

For FISH analysis, the sensitivity was 79.5% and specificity was 96.3%. For cytology, the sensitivity was 27.3% and specificity was 100%. The overall sensitivity for FISH was significantly higher than that of in single value-based urine cytology (79.5% vs. 27.3%, respectively, P < 0.001). The sensitivities of FISH and cytology by grade were 64.3% vs. 28.6% for low-grade urothelial carcinomas (P = 0.128) and 86.7% vs. 26.7% for high-grade urothelial carcinomas (P < 0.001), respectively. Twenty-seven (77.1%) cases were positive due to the gain of two or more chromosomes in five or more urinary cells, among which, 21 (60%) cases showed positivity in all the 4 chromosomes, 7 (20%) cases matched the criterion that 10 or more cells gained a single chromosome, whereas only 1 (2.9%) case was positive because of the homozygous deletion of 9p21 in 12 or more cells.

CONCLUSIONS

FISH has superior sensitivity and similar specificity in the detection of UUT-UC, compared with cytology. The present findings indicated that FISH can be applied as a noninvasive diagnostic tool for suspected UUT-UC patients.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估荧光原位杂交(FISH)在上尿路尿路上皮癌(UUT-UC)检测中的临床应用价值。

方法

2011年11月至2015年11月期间,连续收集52例UUT-UC患者和26例对照者的晨尿标本,进行FISH检测和细胞学检查。确定并比较FISH检测和细胞学检查的敏感性和特异性。同时分析染色体畸变频率。

结果

FISH分析的敏感性为79.5%,特异性为96.3%。细胞学检查的敏感性为27.3%,特异性为100%。FISH的总体敏感性显著高于基于单一值的尿液细胞学检查(分别为79.5%和27.3%,P<0.001)。低级别尿路上皮癌中,FISH和细胞学检查的敏感性分别为64.3%和28.6%(P=0.128);高级别尿路上皮癌中,FISH和细胞学检查的敏感性分别为86.7%和26.7%(P<0.001)。27例(77.1%)病例因5个或更多尿路上皮细胞中两条或更多染色体增加而呈阳性,其中21例(60%)4条染色体均呈阳性,7例(20%)符合10个或更多细胞获得一条染色体的标准,而仅有1例(2.9%)病例因12个或更多细胞中9p21纯合缺失呈阳性。

结论

与细胞学检查相比,FISH在检测UUT-UC方面具有更高的敏感性和相似的特异性。本研究结果表明,FISH可作为疑似UUT-UC患者的无创诊断工具。

相似文献

1
Utility of fluorescence hybridization analysis for detecting upper urinary tract-urothelial carcinoma.荧光杂交分析在上尿路尿路上皮癌检测中的应用
J Cancer Res Ther. 2017;13(4):647-650. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_74_17.
2
[Clinical utility of fluorescence in situ hybridization improves the sensitivity in the diagnosis of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma].荧光原位杂交的临床应用提高了上尿路尿路上皮癌诊断的敏感性
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2010 Aug 18;42(4):381-5.
3
Utility of fluorescence in situ hybridization in the diagnosis of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.荧光原位杂交在上尿路尿路上皮癌诊断中的应用
Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 2009 Mar;189(2):93-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2008.10.015.
4
Utility of fluorescence in situ hybridization as a non-invasive technique in the diagnosis of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.荧光原位杂交作为一种非侵入性技术在上尿路尿路上皮癌诊断中的应用
Eur Urol. 2007 Feb;51(2):409-15; discussion 415. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.08.045. Epub 2006 Sep 8.
5
The Clinical Application of Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization in Diagnosing Urothelial Carcinoma.荧光原位杂交技术在尿路上皮癌诊断中的临床应用
Clin Lab. 2016 Oct 1;62(10):2001-2009. doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2016.160323.
6
[Numerical aberrations of chromosomes 11 and 17 detected by fish--fluorescence in situ hybridization combined with cytology in exfoliated cells from voided urine in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder].[应用荧光原位杂交技术结合膀胱尿路上皮癌患者晨尿脱落细胞的细胞学检查检测11号和17号染色体的数值畸变]
Harefuah. 2007 Dec;146(12):914-9, 1000.
7
The Paris System for urine cytology in upper tract urothelial specimens: A comparative analysis with biopsy and surgical resection.上尿路尿路上皮标本的巴黎尿液细胞学系统:与活检和手术切除的比较分析
Cytopathology. 2018 Apr;29(2):184-188. doi: 10.1111/cyt.12505. Epub 2017 Dec 18.
8
Diagnostic Utility of UroVysion Combined With Conventional Urinary Cytology for Urothelial Carcinoma of the Upper Urinary Tract.UroVysion 联合常规尿液细胞学检查在上尿路尿路上皮癌中的诊断效用。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2019 Apr 2;151(5):469-478. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqy170.
9
Evaluation of fluorescence in situ hybridization as an ancillary tool to urine cytology in diagnosing urothelial carcinoma.评估荧光原位杂交作为尿液细胞学辅助工具在诊断尿路上皮癌中的应用。
Diagn Cytopathol. 2003 Jun;28(6):301-7. doi: 10.1002/dc.10291.
10
Comparison of fluorescence in situ hybridization, NMP22 bladderchek, and urinary liquid-based cytology in the detection of bladder urothelial carcinoma.荧光原位杂交、NMP22膀胱检测法及尿液基细胞学检查在膀胱尿路上皮癌检测中的比较
Diagn Cytopathol. 2013 Oct;41(10):852-7. doi: 10.1002/dc.22969. Epub 2013 Feb 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnostic status and new explorations in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a literature review.上尿路尿路上皮癌的诊断现状与新探索:文献综述
Transl Androl Urol. 2024 Nov 30;13(11):2570-2586. doi: 10.21037/tau-24-326. Epub 2024 Nov 28.
2
Diagnostic performance of an immunoassay based on urine exfoliated cell enrichment nanotechnology for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a retrospective, monocentric study.基于尿液脱落细胞富集纳米技术的免疫测定对上尿路尿路上皮癌的诊断性能:一项回顾性、单中心研究。
BMC Urol. 2022 Nov 25;22(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-01122-4.
3
Detection of Urinary Molecular Marker Test in Urothelial Cell Carcinoma: A Review of Methods and Accuracy.
尿路上皮细胞癌中尿分子标志物检测:方法与准确性综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Nov 4;12(11):2696. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12112696.
4
Diagnostic performance of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC): a systematic review and meta-analysis.荧光原位杂交(FISH)在上尿路尿路上皮癌(UTUC)中的诊断性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2022 Oct;27(10):1605-1615. doi: 10.1007/s10147-022-02216-7. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
5
Non-Invasive Biomarkers in the Diagnosis of Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma-A Systematic Review.非侵入性生物标志物在上尿路尿路上皮癌诊断中的系统评价
Cancers (Basel). 2022 Mar 16;14(6):1520. doi: 10.3390/cancers14061520.
6
UroVysion fluorescence in situ hybridization in urothelial carcinoma: a narrative review and future perspectives.尿路上皮癌中的UroVysion荧光原位杂交:一篇叙述性综述及未来展望
Transl Androl Urol. 2021 Apr;10(4):1908-1917. doi: 10.21037/tau-20-1207.
7
Fluorescence in situ hybridization in 1 mL of selective urine for the detection of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a feasibility study.1 毫升选择性尿液中的荧光原位杂交检测上尿路尿路上皮癌:一项可行性研究。
Med Oncol. 2018 Nov 29;36(1):10. doi: 10.1007/s12032-018-1237-x.