• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动物园和水族馆中投喂活体无脊椎动物猎物:是否存在动物福利问题?

Feeding live invertebrate prey in zoos and aquaria: Are there welfare concerns?

作者信息

Keller Martha

机构信息

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Southwestern Native Aquatic Resources and Recovery Center, Dexter, New Mexico.

出版信息

Zoo Biol. 2017 Sep;36(5):316-322. doi: 10.1002/zoo.21378. Epub 2017 Sep 13.

DOI:10.1002/zoo.21378
PMID:28901580
Abstract

Invertebrates constitute more than 90% of all species on earth, however, as a rule, humans do not regard invertebrates as creatures that can suffer and they are generally seen as creatures that should be eliminated. As a result, the importance of their welfare may be grossly unappreciated. For instance, the feeding of live food is often viewed as a good method of enrichment and invertebrates are commonly used as live prey in many zoological facilities. As a result, zoos may send mixed messages to their patrons in that welfare is considered only for the invertebrates that are part of their zoological collection and not necessarily for the invertebrates used as feed. Research indicates that many invertebrates possess nociceptors, opioid receptors, and demonstrate behavioral responses indicative of pain sensation. In addition, in some taxa, there may be evidence of higher cognitive functions such as emotions and learning, although studies in this area of research are preliminary and sparse. Therefore, the possibility for suffering exists in many invertebrate species and as such, zoological facilities have an ethical responsibility to take their welfare into consideration. This paper discusses the current research regarding invertebrates' capacity for suffering and discusses methods facilities can use to improve the welfare of their invertebrate live prey.

摘要

无脊椎动物占地球上所有物种的90%以上,然而,通常情况下,人类并不认为无脊椎动物是会受苦的生物,它们一般被视为应该被消灭的生物。因此,它们福利的重要性可能被严重忽视。例如,投喂活食通常被视为一种很好的丰容方法,在许多动物园设施中,无脊椎动物通常被用作活的猎物。结果,动物园可能会向其游客传递相互矛盾的信息,因为只考虑了其动物园收藏中的无脊椎动物的福利,而不一定考虑用作饲料的无脊椎动物的福利。研究表明,许多无脊椎动物拥有伤害感受器、阿片受体,并表现出表明疼痛感觉的行为反应。此外,在一些分类群中,可能有证据表明存在诸如情感和学习等更高的认知功能,尽管这一研究领域的研究还处于初步阶段且较为稀少。因此,许多无脊椎动物物种都有可能遭受痛苦,因此,动物园设施有道德责任考虑它们的福利。本文讨论了当前关于无脊椎动物受苦能力的研究,并讨论了设施可以用来改善其无脊椎动物活猎物福利的方法。

相似文献

1
Feeding live invertebrate prey in zoos and aquaria: Are there welfare concerns?动物园和水族馆中投喂活体无脊椎动物猎物:是否存在动物福利问题?
Zoo Biol. 2017 Sep;36(5):316-322. doi: 10.1002/zoo.21378. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
2
Feeding live prey to zoo animals: response of zoo visitors in Switzerland.给动物园动物投喂活猎物:瑞士动物园游客的反应。
Zoo Biol. 2010 May-Jun;29(3):344-50. doi: 10.1002/zoo.20261.
3
Evaluation of Enrichment for Reptiles in Zoos.动物园中爬行动物富集环境的评估
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2019 Jan-Mar;22(1):69-77. doi: 10.1080/10888705.2018.1490182. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
4
Invertebrate welfare: an overlooked issue.无脊椎动物福利:一个被忽视的问题。
Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2013;49(1):9-17. doi: 10.4415/ANN_13_01_04.
5
IACUC Challenges in Invertebrate Research.无脊椎动物研究中的实验动物管理与使用委员会挑战
ILAR J. 2011;52(2):213-20. doi: 10.1093/ilar.52.2.213.
6
Welfare Assessment of Invertebrates: Adapting the Animal Welfare Assessment Grid (AWAG) for Zoo Decapods and Cephalopods.无脊椎动物的福利评估:将动物福利评估网格(AWAG)应用于动物园中的十足目动物和头足类动物。
Animals (Basel). 2022 Jun 29;12(13):1675. doi: 10.3390/ani12131675.
7
Welfare evaluations of nonhuman animals in selected zoos in the Philippines.菲律宾部分动物园中非人类动物的福利评估。
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2005;8(1):59-68. doi: 10.1207/s15327604jaws0801_5.
8
Adaptation of the animal welfare assessment grid (AWAG) for monitoring animal welfare in zoological collections.动物福利评估网格(AWAG)在动物园动物福利监测中的应用。
Vet Rec. 2017 Aug 5;181(6):143. doi: 10.1136/vr.104309. Epub 2017 May 9.
9
Perspective: Opportunities for advancing aquatic invertebrate welfare.观点:促进水生无脊椎动物福利的机遇。
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Nov 15;9:973376. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.973376. eCollection 2022.
10
Unraveling the complexity of the zoo community: identifying the variables related to conservation performance in zoological parks.解读动物园群落的复杂性:识别与动物园保护成效相关的变量。
Zoo Biol. 2012 Jan-Feb;31(1):55-70. doi: 10.1002/zoo.20386. Epub 2011 Apr 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Feeder Insects: The Ethics of Live Feeding in Zoos and Aquariums.饲养昆虫:动物园和水族馆活体投喂的伦理问题
Zoo Biol. 2025 Jul-Aug;44(4):353-359. doi: 10.1002/zoo.21902. Epub 2025 Apr 22.
2
A comparison of attitudes towards animal welfare between British and Japanese zoo visitors: Where and when do cultural differences diverge?英国和日本动物园游客对动物福利态度的比较:文化差异在何处及何时出现分歧?
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 8;20(4):e0320241. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0320241. eCollection 2025.
3
Assessing the Welfare of Captive Group-Housed Cockroaches, .
评估圈养群居蟑螂的健康状况
Animals (Basel). 2023 Oct 27;13(21):3351. doi: 10.3390/ani13213351.
4
The Matter of Non-Avian Reptile Sentience, and Why It "Matters" to Them: A Conceptual, Ethical and Scientific Review.非鸟类爬行动物的感知问题,以及为何这对它们“至关重要”:一项概念性、伦理与科学综述。
Animals (Basel). 2020 May 22;10(5):901. doi: 10.3390/ani10050901.
5
Nociceptive Pathway in the Cockroach .蟑螂的伤害感受通路
Front Physiol. 2019 Aug 21;10:1100. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01100. eCollection 2019.