Suppr超能文献

无脊椎动物研究中的实验动物管理与使用委员会挑战

IACUC Challenges in Invertebrate Research.

作者信息

Harvey-Clark Chris

机构信息

Animal Care Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

ILAR J. 2011;52(2):213-20. doi: 10.1093/ilar.52.2.213.

Abstract

With billions of individuals and possibly hundreds of thousands of genera, invertebrates represent the largest number and greatest diversity of all animals used in research. Although the capacity for nociception is recognized in many invertebrate taxa, researchers and IACUC members are challenged by a lack of clear understanding of invertebrate welfare and by differing standards of moral concern for these taxa. In practice this has led IACUCs to consider invertebrates in two major groups: species worthy of increased moral concern approximating that shown to vertebrate species (this group includes cephalopods and to some extent decapod crustaceans) and all others. This dichotomy has led to differences in how invertebrate research is regulated and documented. This article presents two case studies illustrating specific concerns in invertebrate research protocols and then provides relevant information to address practical IACUC matters related to regulatory and ethical issues, sourcing and record keeping, risk management, assessment of pain and nociception in invertebrates, housing and husbandry, invasive procedures, veterinary care, and humane endpoints.

摘要

无脊椎动物个体数量达数十亿,可能有数十万属,是用于研究的所有动物中数量最多、种类最丰富的。尽管许多无脊椎动物类群都具有痛觉感受能力,但研究人员和机构动物护理与使用委员会(IACUC)成员面临着对无脊椎动物福利缺乏清晰认识以及对这些类群道德关注标准各异的挑战。在实践中,这导致IACUC将无脊椎动物分为两大类:值得增加类似对脊椎动物所表现出的道德关注的物种(这一类包括头足类动物以及在一定程度上的十足目甲壳动物)和其他所有物种。这种二分法导致了无脊椎动物研究在监管和记录方式上的差异。本文介绍了两个案例研究,阐述了无脊椎动物研究方案中的具体问题,然后提供了相关信息,以解决与监管和伦理问题、来源和记录保存、风险管理、无脊椎动物疼痛和痛觉感受评估、饲养和管理、侵入性操作、兽医护理以及人道终点相关的IACUC实际事务。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验