Tse Gary, Gong Mengqi, Wong Cheuk Wai, Chan Cynthia, Georgopoulos Stamatis, Chan Yat Sun, Yan Bryan P, Li Guangping, Whittaker Paula, Ciobanu Ana, Ali-Hasan-Al-Saegh Sadeq, Wong Sunny H, Wu William K K, Bazoukis George, Lampropoulos Konstantinos, Wong Wing Tak, Tse Lap Ah, Baranchuk Adrian M, Letsas Konstantinos P, Liu Tong
Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Faculty of Medicine, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2018 Mar;23(2):e12495. doi: 10.1111/anec.12495. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
The total cosine R-to-T (TCRT), a vectorcardiographic marker reflecting the spatial difference between the depolarization and repolarization wavefronts, has been used to predict ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF) and sudden cardiac death (SCD) in different clinical settings. However, its prognostic value has been controversial.
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the significance of TRCT in predicting arrhythmic and/or mortality endpoints.
PubMed and Embase databases were searched through December 31, 2016.
Of the 890 studies identified initially, 13 observational studies were included in our meta-analysis. A total of 11,528 patients, mean age 47 years old, 72% male, were followed for 43 ± 6 months. Data from five studies demonstrated lower TCRT values in myocardial infarction patients with adverse events (syncope, ventricular arrhythmias, or sudden cardiac death) compared to those without these events (mean difference = -0.36 ± 0.05, p < .001; I = 48%). By contrast, only two studies analyzed outcomes in heart failure, and pooled meta-analysis did not demonstrate significant difference in TCRT between event-positive and event-negative patients (mean difference = -0.01 ± 0.10, p > .05; I = 80%).
TCRT is lower in MI patients at high risk of adverse events when compared to those free from such events. It can provide additional risk stratification beyond the use of clinical parameters and traditional electrocardiogram markers. Its value in other diseases such as heart failure requires further studies.
总余弦R到T(TCRT)是一种反映去极化和复极化波阵面空间差异的向量心电图标志物,已被用于预测不同临床环境下的室性心动过速/心室颤动(VT/VF)和心源性猝死(SCD)。然而,其预后价值一直存在争议。
本系统评价和荟萃分析评估了TCRT在预测心律失常和/或死亡终点方面的意义。
检索了截至2016年12月31日的PubMed和Embase数据库。
在最初确定的890项研究中,13项观察性研究纳入了我们的荟萃分析。共纳入11528例患者,平均年龄47岁,男性占72%,随访43±6个月。五项研究的数据显示,与无不良事件(晕厥、室性心律失常或心源性猝死)的心肌梗死患者相比,发生不良事件的患者TCRT值更低(平均差值=-0.36±0.05,p<.001;I²=48%)。相比之下,只有两项研究分析了心力衰竭患者的结局,汇总的荟萃分析未显示事件阳性和事件阴性患者的TCRT有显著差异(平均差值=-0.01±0.10,p>.05;I²=80%)。
与无不良事件的心肌梗死患者相比,有不良事件高风险的心肌梗死患者TCRT较低。它可以在使用临床参数和传统心电图标志物之外提供额外的风险分层。其在心力衰竭等其他疾病中的价值需要进一步研究。