Penn A C, Zhang C L, Georges F, Royer L, Breillat C, Hosy E, Petersen J D, Humeau Y, Choquet D
University of Bordeaux, Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, UMR5297, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.
CNRS, Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, UMR 5297, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.
Nature. 2017 Sep 21;549(7672):384-388. doi: 10.1038/nature23658. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
Long-term potentiation (LTP) of excitatory synaptic transmission has long been considered a cellular correlate for learning and memory. Early LTP (less than 1 h) had initially been explained either by presynaptic increases in glutamate release or by direct modification of postsynaptic AMPA (α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid) receptor function. Compelling models have more recently proposed that synaptic potentiation can occur by the recruitment of additional postsynaptic AMPA receptors (AMPARs), sourced either from an intracellular reserve pool by exocytosis or from nearby extra-synaptic receptors pre-existing on the neuronal surface. However, the exact mechanism through which synapses can rapidly recruit new AMPARs during early LTP remains unknown. In particular, direct evidence for a pivotal role of AMPAR surface diffusion as a trafficking mechanism in synaptic plasticity is still lacking. Here, using AMPAR immobilization approaches, we show that interfering with AMPAR surface diffusion markedly impairs synaptic potentiation of Schaffer collaterals and commissural inputs to the CA1 area of the mouse hippocampus in cultured slices, acute slices and in vivo. Our data also identify distinct contributions of various AMPAR trafficking routes to the temporal profile of synaptic potentiation. In addition, AMPAR immobilization in vivo in the dorsal hippocampus inhibited fear conditioning, indicating that AMPAR diffusion is important for the early phase of contextual learning. Therefore, our results provide a direct demonstration that the recruitment of new receptors to synapses by surface diffusion is a critical mechanism for the expression of LTP and hippocampal learning. Since AMPAR surface diffusion is dictated by weak Brownian forces that are readily perturbed by protein-protein interactions, we anticipate that this fundamental trafficking mechanism will be a key target for modulating synaptic potentiation and learning.
兴奋性突触传递的长时程增强(LTP)长期以来一直被认为是学习和记忆的细胞关联机制。早期LTP(少于1小时)最初被解释为谷氨酸释放的突触前增加或突触后AMPA(α-氨基-3-羟基-5-甲基-4-异恶唑丙酸)受体功能的直接改变。最近有令人信服的模型提出,突触增强可通过募集额外的突触后AMPA受体(AMPARs)来实现,这些受体要么通过胞吐作用从细胞内储备池中获取,要么来自神经元表面预先存在的附近突触外受体。然而,在早期LTP期间突触如何快速募集新的AMPARs的确切机制仍然未知。特别是,仍然缺乏直接证据证明AMPAR表面扩散作为一种转运机制在突触可塑性中起关键作用。在这里,我们使用AMPAR固定方法表明,干扰AMPAR表面扩散会显著损害培养切片、急性切片和体内小鼠海马体CA1区的Schaffer侧支和连合输入的突触增强。我们的数据还确定了各种AMPAR转运途径对突触增强时间特征的不同贡献。此外,在背侧海马体中进行体内AMPAR固定会抑制恐惧条件反射,这表明AMPAR扩散对情境学习的早期阶段很重要。因此,我们的结果直接证明了通过表面扩散将新受体募集到突触是LTP表达和海马体学习的关键机制。由于AMPAR表面扩散是由容易受到蛋白质-蛋白质相互作用干扰的微弱布朗力所决定的,我们预计这种基本的转运机制将成为调节突触增强和学习的关键靶点。