• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分析韩国医疗保健系统的历史发展与转变。

Analyzing the Historical Development and Transition of the Korean Health Care System.

作者信息

Lee Sang-Yi, Kim Chul-Woung, Seo Nam-Kyu, Lee Seung Eun

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Jeju National University, School of Medicine, Jeju, Korea.

Department of Preventive Medicine and Research Institute for Medical Sciences, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.

出版信息

Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2017 Aug;8(4):247-254. doi: 10.24171/j.phrp.2017.8.4.03. Epub 2017 Aug 31.

DOI:10.24171/j.phrp.2017.8.4.03
PMID:28904846
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5594720/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Many economically advanced countries have attempted to minimize public expenditures and pursue privatization based on the principles of neo-liberalism. However, Korea has moved contrary to this global trend. This study examines why and how the Korean health care system was formed, developed, and transformed into an integrated, single-insurer, National Health Insurance (NHI) system.

METHODS

We describe the transition in the Korean health care system using an analytical framework that incorporates such critical variables as government economic development strategies and the relationships among social forces, state autonomy, and state power. This study focuses on how the relationships among social forces can change as a nation's economic development or governing strategy changes in response to changes in international circumstances such as globalization.

RESULTS

The corporatist Social Health Insurance (SHI) system (multiple insurers) introduced in 1977 was transformed into the single-insurer NHI in July 2000. These changes were influenced externally by globalization and internally by political democratization, keeping Korea's private-dominant health care provision system unchanged over several decades.

CONCLUSION

Major changes such as integration reform occurred, when high levels of state autonomy were ensured. The state's power (its policy capability), based on health care infrastructures, acts to limit the direction of any change in the health care system because it is very difficult to build the infrastructure for a health care system in a short timeframe.

摘要

目标

许多经济发达国家试图基于新自由主义原则尽量减少公共支出并推行私有化。然而,韩国却逆这一全球趋势而动。本研究探讨韩国医疗保健系统为何以及如何形成、发展并转变为一个整合的、单一保险人的国民健康保险(NHI)系统。

方法

我们使用一个分析框架来描述韩国医疗保健系统的转变,该框架纳入了诸如政府经济发展战略以及社会力量、国家自主性和国家权力之间的关系等关键变量。本研究聚焦于随着国家经济发展或治理战略因全球化等国际形势变化而改变时,社会力量之间的关系会如何变化。

结果

1977年引入的社团主义社会健康保险(SHI)系统(多个保险人)在2000年7月转变为单一保险人的NHI。这些变化受到外部全球化和内部政治民主化的影响,使得韩国以私立为主导的医疗保健提供系统在几十年间保持不变。

结论

当确保了高水平的国家自主性时,诸如整合改革等重大变革就会发生。基于医疗保健基础设施的国家权力(其政策能力)会限制医疗保健系统任何变革的方向,因为在短时间内建立医疗保健系统的基础设施非常困难。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d325/5594720/0850bf6973df/phrp-08-247f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d325/5594720/0850bf6973df/phrp-08-247f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d325/5594720/0850bf6973df/phrp-08-247f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Analyzing the Historical Development and Transition of the Korean Health Care System.分析韩国医疗保健系统的历史发展与转变。
Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2017 Aug;8(4):247-254. doi: 10.24171/j.phrp.2017.8.4.03. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
2
Health Security Ideas of Major Political Groups and the US Military Government during the Liberation Period (1945-1948) in Korea.朝鲜解放时期(1945-1948)主要政治团体和美国军政府的卫生安全理念。
Uisahak. 2022 Apr;31(1):221-262. doi: 10.13081/kjmh.2022.31.221.
3
The Consolidation of Risk Pools in the National Health Insurance Program of the Republic of Korea: Analysis of the Political Processes.韩国国家健康保险计划中风险池的整合:政治过程分析。
Health Syst Reform. 2024 Dec 16;10(1):2375101. doi: 10.1080/23288604.2024.2375101. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
4
Lessons from Korea's pharmaceutical policy reform: the separation of medical institutions and pharmacies for outpatient care.韩国药品政策改革的经验教训:门诊医疗中医疗机构与药房的分离
Health Policy. 2004 Jun;68(3):267-75. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2003.10.012.
5
Tuberculosis结核病
6
Private health insurance in South Korea: an international comparison.韩国私人健康保险:国际比较。
Health Policy. 2012 Nov;108(1):76-85. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.08.011. Epub 2012 Sep 6.
7
The development of health care policies in Trinidad and Tobago: autonomy or domination?特立尼达和多巴哥医疗保健政策的发展:自主还是主导?
Int J Health Serv. 1989;19(1):79-93. doi: 10.2190/VQ42-MYBV-CTFA-EC0W.
8
The emergence of a health insurance system in a developing country: the case of South Korea.一个发展中国家医疗保险制度的出现:以韩国为例。
J Health Soc Behav. 1989 Dec;30(4):467-71.
9
The health insurance system in Korea and its implications.韩国的医疗保险制度及其影响。
World Hosp Health Serv. 1995;31(3):3-9.
10
Health care reform in South Korea: success or failure?韩国的医疗保健改革:成功还是失败?
Am J Public Health. 2003 Jan;93(1):48-51. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.1.48.

引用本文的文献

1
Estimation of the benefit from pre-emptive genotyping based on the nationwide cohort data in South Korea.基于韩国全国队列数据的预先基因分型获益估计。
Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Mar;17(3):e13772. doi: 10.1111/cts.13772.
2
Lessons from health insurance responses in counteracting COVID-19: a qualitative comparative analysis of South Korea and three influential countries.医疗保险应对新冠疫情的经验教训:对韩国和三个有影响力国家的定性比较分析
Arch Public Health. 2023 Nov 21;81(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s13690-023-01209-w.
3
Role of Primary Care and Challenges for Public-Private Cooperation during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: An Expert Delphi Study in South Korea.

本文引用的文献

1
The National Health Insurance system as one type of new typology: the case of South Korea and Taiwan.作为一种新型模式的国民健康保险制度:韩国和台湾地区的案例
Health Policy. 2008 Jan;85(1):105-13. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.07.006. Epub 2007 Aug 20.
2
The Medicare approach: political choice and American institutions.医疗保险方案:政治选择与美国制度
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2007 Apr;32(2):159-86. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2006-035.
3
Power rather than path dependency? The dynamics of institutional change under health care federalism.
《2019 年冠状病毒病大流行期间初级保健的作用和公私合作面临的挑战:韩国专家德尔菲研究》
Yonsei Med J. 2021 Jul;62(7):660-669. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2021.62.7.660.
4
Post-COVID healthcare reform in India: What to expect?印度新冠疫情后的医疗改革:前景如何?
J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Nov 30;9(11):5427-5431. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1548_20. eCollection 2020 Nov.
5
The sociopolitical context of the COVID-19 response in South Korea.韩国应对新冠疫情的社会政治背景。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 May;5(5). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002714.
6
The Story of Korean Health Insurance System.韩国医疗保险制度的故事。
Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2017 Aug;8(4):235-236. doi: 10.24171/j.phrp.2017.8.4.01. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
权力而非路径依赖?医疗联邦制下的制度变迁动态
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2005 Feb-Apr;30(1-2):231-52. doi: 10.1215/03616878-30-1-2-231.
4
The new politics of U.S. health policy.美国卫生政策的新政治格局。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1997 Apr;22(2):315-38. doi: 10.1215/03616878-22-2-315.
5
Why some countries have national health insurance, others have national health services, and the U.S. has neither.为什么有些国家有国家医疗保险,有些国家有国家医疗服务,而美国却两者都没有。
Soc Sci Med. 1989;28(9):887-98. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(89)90313-4.