Akil Ali, Semik Michael, Freermann Stefan, Reichelt Jan, Redwan Bassam, Görlich Dennis, Fischer Stefan
Department of Thoracic Surgery and Lung Support, Klinikum Ibbenbüren, Ibbenbueren, Germany.
Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Apr;67(3):216-221. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1606313. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS)-lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) represents an important treatment option for patients with advanced lung emphysema. For VATS lung resection, endoscopic staplers are routinely used. Recently, a new generation of electronically powered stapling systems was developed. In this study, the iDrive powered stapling system (Covidien, Germany) was first tested during VATS-LVRS and compared with a non-electronic conventional device.
Forty patients with advanced emphysema were enrolled in a prospective randomized trial. All patients underwent bilateral VATS-LVRS. Patients were randomized for iDrive use on the right lung ( = 20) or left lung resection ( = 20). A conventional endoscopic stapler (EndoGIA, Covidien) was used for contralateral resection in same patients. Therefore, 40 resections were performed with the iDrive and 40 with the EndoGIA. The duration of surgery, air leakage after extubation, and on postoperative day 1 (POD1), as well as length of chest tube therapy, were documented.
The application of the new system was uneventful. Mean duration of surgery was 52 ± 2.5 minute in the iDrive group compared with 54 ± 3.8 minute in the EndoGIA-group ( = 0.5). After extubation, the mean air leakage in the iDrive-group did not differ significantly from that in the EndoGIA-group ( = 0.6). This was also observed on POD1 ( = 0.7). Moreover, length of drainage therapy also did not show significant differences between both groups ( = 0.6).
The iDrive powered stapling system offers one-handed, push-button operation, which eliminates the manual firing force and possibly enables more precise resection. In the current study, the novel system led to comparable results with the conventional mechanical stapler without any disadvantages in patients undergoing bilateral VATS-LVRS.
电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)-肺减容手术(LVRS)是晚期肺气肿患者的一种重要治疗选择。对于VATS肺切除术,通常使用内镜吻合器。最近,新一代电动吻合系统被研发出来。在本研究中,iDrive电动吻合系统(柯惠,德国)首次在VATS-LVRS手术中进行测试,并与非电动传统器械进行比较。
40例晚期肺气肿患者纳入一项前瞻性随机试验。所有患者均接受双侧VATS-LVRS。患者被随机分为在右肺使用iDrive(n = 20)或左肺切除(n = 20)。同一患者对侧切除使用传统内镜吻合器(EndoGIA,柯惠)。因此,使用iDrive进行了40例切除,使用EndoGIA进行了40例切除。记录手术时间、拔管后漏气情况、术后第1天(POD1)以及胸管治疗时间。
新系统的应用过程顺利。iDrive组的平均手术时间为52±2.5分钟,而EndoGIA组为54±3.8分钟(P = 0.5)。拔管后,iDrive组的平均漏气量与EndoGIA组无显著差异(P = 0.6)。在POD1时也观察到同样情况(P = 0.7)。此外,两组的引流治疗时间也无显著差异(P = 0.6)。
iDrive电动吻合系统提供单手按钮操作,消除了手动击发力,可能使切除更精确。在本研究中,该新型系统在接受双侧VATS-LVRS的患者中产生了与传统机械吻合器相当的结果,且没有任何劣势。