Cao Yang, Xiong Fang, Xia Xiaozhe, Gu Pengjuan, Wang Qinghong, Wu Aiping, Zhan Huan, Chen Wendong, Qian Zhaoxin
Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Changsha Normin Health Technology Ltd, Changsha, China.
Health Econ Rev. 2022 Feb 9;12(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s13561-022-00359-x.
To assess the economic impact of powered stapler use in video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lobectomy for lung cancer in a Chinese tertiary care hospital.
This study identified 388 patients who received VATS lobectomy using the ECHELON powered stapler (n = 296) or the ECHELON manual stapler (n = 92) for lung cancer in a Chinese tertiary hospital. Multiple generalized linear regression analyses were conducted using data on hospital costs and patient characteristics to develop predictive equations for hospital costs in a cost-minimization analysis (CMA) model comparing hospital costs associated with the ECHELON powered stapler and the ECHELON manual stapler. CMA model was used to conduct scenario analysis to compare the ECHELON powered stapler with another manual stapler (Victor Medical).
The multiple generalized linear regression analyses identified that using the ECHELON powered stapler in VATS lobectomy for lung cancer was associated with significantly lower drug costs than using the ECHELON manual stapler (coefficient - 0.256, 95% confidence interval: - 0.375 to - 0.139). The CMA model estimated that the ECHELON powered stapler could save hospital costs by ¥1653 when compared with the ECHELON manual stapler (¥65,531 vs. ¥67,184). The use of the ECHELON powered stapler also saved hospital costs by ¥4411 when compared with the Victor Medical manual stapler (¥65,531 vs. ¥69,942) in the scenario analysis.
Compared to the two manual staplers used for VATS lobectomy for lung cancer in a Chinese tertiary hospital, the ECHELON powered stapler had 100% probability to save total hospital costs under present prices of the three staplers according to the CMA.
评估在中国一家三级医院中,电动吻合器在肺癌电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)肺叶切除术中使用的经济影响。
本研究纳入了中国一家三级医院中388例接受VATS肺叶切除术治疗肺癌的患者,其中296例使用了ECHELON电动吻合器,92例使用了ECHELON手动吻合器。在成本最小化分析(CMA)模型中,利用医院成本和患者特征数据进行多元广义线性回归分析,以建立医院成本的预测方程,比较ECHELON电动吻合器和ECHELON手动吻合器的医院成本。使用CMA模型进行情景分析,将ECHELON电动吻合器与另一种手动吻合器(威克医疗)进行比较。
多元广义线性回归分析表明,在VATS肺癌肺叶切除术中使用ECHELON电动吻合器的药物成本显著低于使用ECHELON手动吻合器(系数为 -0.256,95%置信区间:-0.375至-0.139)。CMA模型估计,与ECHELON手动吻合器相比,ECHELON电动吻合器可节省医院成本1653元(65531元对67184元)。在情景分析中,与威克医疗手动吻合器相比,使用ECHELON电动吻合器也可节省医院成本4411元(65531元对69942元)。
根据CMA,在中国一家三级医院用于VATS肺癌肺叶切除术的两种手动吻合器相比,在三种吻合器当前价格下,ECHELON电动吻合器有100%的概率节省医院总成本。