Singleton Neal, Agius Lewis, Andrews Stephen
Orthopaedic Department, Hawkes Bay Hospital, Hastings, New Zealand.
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2017 Sep-Dec;25(3):2309499017727950. doi: 10.1177/2309499017727950.
Various radiographic measurements that describe humeral head coverage by the acromion and the effect on rotator cuff pathology have been reported. This study aimed to describe and validate a new radiographic measurement, the acromiohumeral centre edge angle (ACEA).
We compared the ACEA on computed tomography (CT) and plain X-ray to determine whether X-ray is accurate for measuring this angle. We then compared the results from this control population with 107 patients with acute rotator cuff tears. We compared functional outcomes in rotator cuff tear patients to determine whether the ACEA has any effect on outcome after surgery. An intra- and inter-observer variability analysis was performed and we compared the ACEA to the acromial index (AI) on rotation X-rays.
The ACEA was comparable on CT and plain X-ray and was most accurate when true anteroposterior glenohumeral X-rays were used (15.94° vs. 15.87° on CT, p = 0.476). The ACEA showed high intra- and inter-observer reproducibility and was unchanged on internal and external rotation X-rays (20.48 vs. 20.47, p = 0.842), whereas the AI was significantly different (0.74 vs. 0.70, p < 0.001). The ACEA was significantly higher in our rotator cuff tear patients than the control population (23.9° vs. 16.6°, p < 0.001), although a higher ACEA was not associated with poorer outcomes.
The ACEA is a valid measurement for describing humeral head coverage by the acromion and can be accurately measured on plain radiographs with good reproducibility. It is unaffected by shoulder rotation and was significantly higher in patients with acute rotator cuff tears.
已有多种影像学测量方法用于描述肩峰对肱骨头的覆盖情况及其对肩袖病变的影响。本研究旨在描述并验证一种新的影像学测量方法——肩峰肱骨头中心边缘角(ACEA)。
我们比较了计算机断层扫描(CT)和普通X线片上的ACEA,以确定X线测量该角度是否准确。然后将该对照组人群的结果与107例急性肩袖撕裂患者的结果进行比较。我们比较了肩袖撕裂患者的功能结局,以确定ACEA对手术预后是否有影响。进行了观察者内和观察者间的变异性分析,并在旋转X线片上比较了ACEA与肩峰指数(AI)。
CT和普通X线片上的ACEA具有可比性,使用真正的肩关节前后位X线片时测量最准确(CT上为15.94°,X线片上为15.87°,p = 0.476)。ACEA显示出较高的观察者内和观察者间重复性,在肩关节内旋和外旋X线片上无变化(分别为20.48和20.47,p = 0.842),而AI有显著差异(分别为0.74和0.70,p < 0.001)。我们的肩袖撕裂患者的ACEA显著高于对照组人群(23.9°对16.6°,p < 0.001),尽管较高的ACEA与较差的预后无关。
ACEA是一种用于描述肩峰对肱骨头覆盖情况的有效测量方法,可在普通X线片上准确测量,重复性良好。它不受肩关节旋转的影响,在急性肩袖撕裂患者中显著更高。