Sichuan Provincial Orthopedic Hospital Upper Arm Department, Chengdu, China.
Orthop Surg. 2023 Aug;15(8):1997-2006. doi: 10.1111/os.13610. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
Rotator cuff injury caused by subacromial impingement presents different morphologies. This study aims to investigate the correlation between various shoulder anatomical indexes on X-ray with subacromial impingement and morphology of rotator cuff tears to facilitate surgical management.
This retrospective study was carried out between January 2020 and May 2022. Patients who were diagnosed as sub-acromial impingement associated with rotator cuff tears (without tendon retraction) and received arthroscopic surgery were enrolled in this study. The radiographic indexes of acromial slope (AS), acromial tilt (AT), lateral acromial angle (LAA), acromial Index (AI), and sub-acromial distance (SAD) were measured on preoperative true AP view and outlet view. The location of rotator cuff tear (anterior, middle, posterior, medial, and lateral) and morphology of tear (horizontal, longitudinal, L-shaped, and irregular shaped) were evaluated by arthroscopy. Groups were set up due to different tear location and tear morphologies, by comparing the various radiographic indices between each group (one-way analysis of variance and t-test), the correlation between radiographic indices and tear characteristics was investigated.
We analyzed 92 shoulders from 92 patients with a mean age of 57.23 ± 8.45 years. The AS in anterior tear group (29.32 ± 6.91°) was significantly larger than that in middle tear group (18.41 ± 6.13°) (p = 0.000) and posterior tear group (24.01 ± 7.69°) (p = 0.041). The AS in posterior tear group (24.01 ± 7.69°) was significantly larger than that in middle tear group (18.41 ± 6.13°) (p = 0.029). The LAA in middle tear group (67.41 ± 6.54°) was significantly smaller than that in posterior group (72.74 ± 8.78°) (p = 0.046). The AS in longitudinal tear group (26.86 ± 8.41°) was significantly larger than that in horizontal tear group (22.05 ± 9.47°) (p = 0.035) and L-shaped group (21.56 ± 6.62°) (p = 0.032). The LAA in horizontal group (70.60 ± 6.50°) was significantly larger than that in L-shaped group (66.39 ± 7.31°) (p = 0.033). The AI in L-shaped tear group (0.832 ± 0.074) was significantly larger than that in horizontal tear group (0.780 ± 0.084) (p = 0.019) and irregular tear group (0.781 ± 0.068) (p = 0.047).
Acromion with a larger AS and a smaller LAA tend to cause anterior or posterior rotator cuff tears rather than middle tears in sub-acromial impingement. Meanwhile acromion with a larger AS tends to cause a longitudinal tear, a larger LAA tends to cause horizontal tears and a larger AI tends to cause L-shaped tears.
肩峰下撞击导致的肩袖损伤具有不同的形态。本研究旨在探讨 X 线检查中各种肩部解剖学指标与肩峰下撞击和肩袖撕裂形态之间的相关性,以方便手术治疗。
这是一项回顾性研究,于 2020 年 1 月至 2022 年 5 月进行。纳入了被诊断为肩峰下撞击伴肩袖撕裂(无肌腱回缩)并接受关节镜手术的患者。在术前正位前后位和出口位测量肩峰倾斜角(AS)、肩峰倾斜角(AT)、外侧肩峰角(LAA)、肩峰指数(AI)和肩峰下距离(SAD)等影像学指标。通过关节镜评估肩袖撕裂的位置(前、中、后、内和外)和撕裂形态(水平、纵向、L 形和不规则形)。根据不同的撕裂位置和撕裂形态设置组,通过比较各组之间的各种影像学指标(单因素方差分析和 t 检验),研究影像学指标与撕裂特征之间的相关性。
我们分析了 92 名患者的 92 个肩部,平均年龄为 57.23±8.45 岁。在前撕裂组(29.32±6.91°)中,AS 明显大于中撕裂组(18.41±6.13°)(p=0.000)和后撕裂组(24.01±7.69°)(p=0.041)。后撕裂组的 AS(24.01±7.69°)明显大于中撕裂组(18.41±6.13°)(p=0.029)。中撕裂组的 LAA(67.41±6.54°)明显小于后撕裂组(72.74±8.78°)(p=0.046)。中撕裂组的 AS(26.86±8.41°)明显大于水平撕裂组(22.05±9.47°)(p=0.035)和 L 形撕裂组(21.56±6.62°)(p=0.032)。水平撕裂组的 LAA(70.60±6.50°)明显大于 L 形撕裂组(66.39±7.31°)(p=0.033)。L 形撕裂组的 AI(0.832±0.074)明显大于水平撕裂组(0.780±0.084)(p=0.019)和不规则撕裂组(0.781±0.068)(p=0.047)。
肩峰具有较大的 AS 和较小的 LAA 倾向于导致肩峰下撞击中的前或后肩袖撕裂,而不是中间撕裂。同时,具有较大 AS 的肩峰倾向于导致纵向撕裂,较大的 LAA 倾向于导致水平撕裂,较大的 AI 倾向于导致 L 形撕裂。