• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

整形手术中对更高证据水平的需求。

The Need for Higher Levels of Evidence in Plastic Surgery.

作者信息

Wang Jennifer, Schafer Charles, Steele Thomas, Janis Jeffrey E, Losken Albert

机构信息

From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Ga.

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Nov 5;12(11):e6263. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006263. eCollection 2024 Nov.

DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000006263
PMID:39507308
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11537568/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evidence-based medicine in plastic surgery is essential to provide optimal care to individual patients. Level of evidence (LOE) and number of citations are metrics used to gauge quality of research and impact within a field, respectively. The objective of this study was to determine an association between LOE and number of citations within recently published articles in (PRS).

METHODS

A review of original research articles published in PRS from January 2018 to June 2022 was performed. LOE was identified through the PRS website, and the number of citations identified via PubMed. Articles were further divided into sections of their corresponding topic.

RESULTS

A total of 965 articles were reviewed, of which 21 (2.2%) were articles assigned level I evidence. There were 147 (15.2%) level II articles, 360 (37.3%) level III articles, 377 (39.1%) level IV articles, and 60 (6.2%) level V articles. The average number of citations per article was 2.72, and the average LOE of all included articles was 3.31. Level I articles had an average of 4.95 citations, whereas level II, III, IV, and V articles had averages of 2.95, 2.54, 2.64, and 2.71, respectively. Breast articles were cited on average 3.85 times each, more than any other type of article.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data show that articles assigned level I evidence in PRS trend toward higher numbers of citations compared with articles assigned lower LOEs. These findings should encourage investigators to publish high-quality research to advance the field of plastic surgery.

摘要

背景

整形外科学中的循证医学对于为个体患者提供最佳治疗至关重要。证据水平(LOE)和引用次数分别是用于衡量研究质量和该领域影响力的指标。本研究的目的是确定在《整形与重建外科》(PRS)近期发表的文章中证据水平与引用次数之间的关联。

方法

对2018年1月至2022年6月在PRS上发表的原创研究文章进行综述。通过PRS网站确定证据水平,并通过PubMed确定引用次数。文章进一步按照相应主题进行分类。

结果

共审查了965篇文章,其中21篇(2.2%)被评为I级证据文章。有147篇(15.2%)II级文章,360篇(37.3%)III级文章,377篇(39.1%)IV级文章,以及60篇(6.2%)V级文章。每篇文章的平均引用次数为2.72,所有纳入文章的平均证据水平为3.31。I级文章平均有4.95次引用,而II级、III级、IV级和V级文章的平均引用次数分别为2.95、2.54、2.64和2.71。乳房相关文章平均每篇被引用3.85次,高于其他任何类型的文章。

结论

我们的数据表明,与证据水平较低的文章相比,PRS中被评为I级证据的文章引用次数有更高的趋势。这些发现应鼓励研究人员发表高质量的研究,以推动整形外科学领域的发展。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03d6/11537568/17d2e782c039/gox-12-e6263-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03d6/11537568/7b638e29090f/gox-12-e6263-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03d6/11537568/398ecf612453/gox-12-e6263-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03d6/11537568/c44595a0b03f/gox-12-e6263-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03d6/11537568/4b3bb3cbf22d/gox-12-e6263-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03d6/11537568/f2c0c2518170/gox-12-e6263-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03d6/11537568/17d2e782c039/gox-12-e6263-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03d6/11537568/7b638e29090f/gox-12-e6263-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03d6/11537568/398ecf612453/gox-12-e6263-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03d6/11537568/c44595a0b03f/gox-12-e6263-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03d6/11537568/4b3bb3cbf22d/gox-12-e6263-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03d6/11537568/f2c0c2518170/gox-12-e6263-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03d6/11537568/17d2e782c039/gox-12-e6263-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
The Need for Higher Levels of Evidence in Plastic Surgery.整形手术中对更高证据水平的需求。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024 Nov 5;12(11):e6263. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006263. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
An Update on the Level of Evidence for Plastic Surgery Research Published in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.发表于《整形与重建外科》杂志的整形外科学术研究证据水平的最新情况
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2016 Jul 13;4(7):e798. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000796. eCollection 2016 Jul.
3
Level of evidence analysis of the Saudi Dental Journal: A bibliometric analysis of publications from 2012 to 2021.《沙特牙科杂志》的证据水平分析:2012年至2021年出版物的文献计量分析。
Saudi Dent J. 2023 Nov;35(7):812-818. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.06.006. Epub 2023 Jun 23.
4
Revisiting Level of Evidence Ratings in Plastic Surgery: A Call to Action.重新审视整形外科学中的证据水平评级:行动呼吁。
Aesthet Surg J. 2024 May 15;44(6):NP421-NP426. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjae041.
5
The Impact of Senior Author Profile on Publication Level of Evidence in .资深作者简介对……中证据发表水平的影响
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Sep 30;10(9):e4506. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004506. eCollection 2022 Sep.
6
Evidence-Based Medicine in Plastic Surgery: Are We There Yet?整形外科学中的循证医学:我们做到了吗?
Ann Plast Surg. 2018 Jan;80(1):71-75. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001179.
7
Assessment of Characteristics and Methodological Quality of the Top 50 Most Cited Articles on Platelet-Rich Plasma in Musculoskeletal Medicine.肌肉骨骼医学中关于富血小板血浆的50篇被引用次数最多的文章的特征及方法学质量评估
Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 May 26;10(5):23259671221093074. doi: 10.1177/23259671221093074. eCollection 2022 May.
8
Does quality of research in otolaryngology correlate with academic impact?耳鼻喉科学的研究质量与学术影响力相关吗?
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2020 Aug 11;5(5):819-823. doi: 10.1002/lio2.444. eCollection 2020 Oct.
9
Most Cited Articles in Body Contouring: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Past 45 Years.身体塑形领域被引用最多的文章:过去45年的文献计量分析
Plast Surg (Oakv). 2024 May;32(2):265-275. doi: 10.1177/22925503221120574. Epub 2022 Sep 1.
10
Assessment and Trends of the Methodological Quality of the Top 50 Most Cited Articles on Patellar Instability.髌股关节不稳领域被引用次数最多的50篇文章的方法学质量评估及趋势
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Jan 29;9(1):2325967120972016. doi: 10.1177/2325967120972016. eCollection 2021 Jan.

引用本文的文献

1
The Medicolegal Challenges of Facial Plastic Surgery: A Systematic Review.面部整形手术的法医学挑战:一项系统综述
Aesthet Surg J. 2025 Aug 18;45(9):973-984. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjaf082.

本文引用的文献

1
Revisiting Level of Evidence Ratings in Plastic Surgery: A Call to Action.重新审视整形外科学中的证据水平评级:行动呼吁。
Aesthet Surg J. 2024 May 15;44(6):NP421-NP426. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjae041.
2
The Value of Case Reports in Plastic Surgery: An Analysis of 68,444 Articles across Six Major Plastic Surgery Journals.病例报告在整形手术中的价值:对六本主要整形手术期刊上68444篇文章的分析
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Jun 14;11(6):e5069. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005069. eCollection 2023 Jun.
3
The Level of Evidence Pyramid: Indicating Levels of Evidence in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Articles.
证据等级金字塔:整形外科和重建外科文章中的证据等级说明
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 Nov 1;148(5S):68S-71S. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000794868.07051.b4.
4
Evaluation of Social Media Utilization by Academic Plastic Surgery Programs during the COVID-19 Pandemic.评估 COVID-19 大流行期间学术整形外科学科利用社交媒体的情况。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021 Nov 1;148(5):825e-836e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008482.
5
Analyzing the Quality of Aesthetic Surgery Procedure Videos on TikTok.分析 TikTok 上美容手术流程视频的质量。
Aesthet Surg J. 2021 Nov 12;41(12):2078-2083. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjab291.
6
Impact of Level of Evidence on Citation of Orthopaedic Articles.证据水平对骨科文献引用的影响。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021 Dec 1;29(23):e1274-e1281. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-00733.
7
What Is the Predictive Ability and Academic Impact of the Altmetrics Score and Social Media Attention?altmetrics 分数和社交媒体关注度的预测能力和学术影响力如何?
Am J Sports Med. 2020 Apr;48(5):1056-1062. doi: 10.1177/0363546520903703. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
8
An Update on Social Media in Academic Plastic Surgery Training Programs: The Rising Trend of Likes, Shares, and Retweets.学术整形外科培训项目中的社交媒体最新情况:点赞、分享和转发量的上升趋势
Ann Plast Surg. 2020 Aug;85(2):100-104. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000002289.
9
Reading between the Lines: A Plastic Surgeon's Guide to Evaluating the Quality of Evidence in Research Publications.字里行间的解读:整形外科医生评估研究出版物证据质量指南
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 Jun 19;7(6):e2311. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002311. eCollection 2019 Jun.
10
The Use of Twitter by Plastic Surgery Journals.整形外科学期刊对 Twitter 的使用。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 May;143(5):1092e-1098e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005535.