Suppr超能文献

透析器膜材料对慢性血液透析患者生存的影响:日本全国透析登记年度调查结果

Effect of dialyzer membrane materials on survival in chronic hemodialysis patients: Results from the annual survey of the Japanese Nationwide Dialysis Registry.

作者信息

Abe Masanori, Hamano Takayuki, Wada Atsushi, Nakai Shigeru, Masakane Ikuto

机构信息

Division of Nephrology, Hypertension and Endocrinology, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Comprehensive Kidney Disease Research, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Sep 14;12(9):e0184424. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184424. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Little information is available regarding which type of dialyzer membrane results in good prognosis in patients on chronic hemodialysis. Therefore, we conducted a cohort study from a nationwide registry of hemodialysis patients in Japan to establish the association between different dialyzer membranes and mortality rates.

METHODS

We followed 142,412 patients on maintenance hemodialysis (female, 39.1%; mean age, 64.8 ± 12.3 years; median dialysis duration, 7 [4-12] years) for a year from 2008 to 2009. We included patients treated with seven types of high-flux dialyzer membranes at baseline, including cellulose triacetate (CTA), ethylene vinyl alcohol (EVAL), polyacrylonitrile (PAN), polyester polymer alloy (PEPA), polyethersulfone (PES), polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), and polysulfone (PS). Cox regression was used to estimate the association between baseline dialyzers and all-cause mortality as hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals for 1-year mortality adjusting for potential confounders, and propensity score matching analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The distribution of patients treated with each membrane was as follows: PS (56.0%), CTA (17.3%), PES (12.0%), PEPA (7.5%), PMMA (4.9%), PAN (1.2%), and EVAL (1.1%). When data were adjusted using basic factors, with PS as a reference group, the mortality rate was significantly higher in all groups except for the PES group. When data were further adjusted for dialysis-related factors, HRs were significantly higher for the CTA, EVAL, and PEPA groups. When the data were further adjusted for nutrition-and inflammation-related factors, HRs were significantly lower for the PMMA and PES groups compared with the PS group. After propensity score matching, HRs were significantly lower for the PMMA group than for the PS group.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that the use of different membrane types may affect mortality in hemodialysis patients. However, further long-term prospective studies are needed to clarify these findings, including whether the use of the PMMA membrane can improve prognosis.

摘要

背景

关于哪种类型的透析器膜能使慢性血液透析患者获得良好预后的信息较少。因此,我们从日本全国血液透析患者登记处进行了一项队列研究,以确定不同透析器膜与死亡率之间的关联。

方法

我们对142412例维持性血液透析患者(女性占39.1%;平均年龄64.8±12.3岁;透析中位时长7[4 - 12]年)进行了为期一年的随访,时间从2008年至2009年。纳入了基线时接受七种高通量透析器膜治疗的患者,包括三醋酸纤维素(CTA)、乙烯 - 乙烯醇共聚物(EVAL)、聚丙烯腈(PAN)、聚酯聚合物合金(PEPA)、聚醚砜(PES)、聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)和聚砜(PS)。采用Cox回归估计基线透析器与全因死亡率之间的关联,以风险比(HRs)和1年死亡率的95%置信区间表示,并对潜在混杂因素进行调整,同时进行倾向评分匹配分析。

结果

接受每种膜治疗的患者分布如下:PS(56.0%)、CTA(17.3%)、PES(12.0%)、PEPA(7.5%)、PMMA(4.9%)、PAN(1.2%)和EVAL(1.1%)。当使用基本因素进行数据调整时,以PS作为参照组,除PES组外,所有组的死亡率均显著更高。当对透析相关因素进一步调整数据时,CTA、EVAL和PEPA组的HRs显著更高。当对营养和炎症相关因素进一步调整数据时,与PS组相比,PMMA和PES组的HRs显著更低。倾向评分匹配后,PMMA组的HRs显著低于PS组。

结论

结果表明,使用不同类型的膜可能会影响血液透析患者的死亡率。然而,需要进一步的长期前瞻性研究来阐明这些发现,包括使用PMMA膜是否能改善预后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be9f/5598977/7028d7c99191/pone.0184424.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验