Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
International Breast Cancer Study Group Statistical Center, Boston, USA.
Ann Oncol. 2017 Sep 1;28(9):2225-2232. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx285.
Recent breast cancer treatment guidelines recommend that higher-risk premenopausal patients should receive ovarian function suppression (OFS) as part of adjuvant endocrine therapy. If chemotherapy is also given, it is uncertain whether to select concurrent or sequential OFS initiation.
We analyzed 1872 patients enrolled in the randomized phase III TEXT and SOFT trials who received adjuvant chemotherapy for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer and upon randomization to an OFS-containing adjuvant endocrine therapy, initiated gonadotropin-releasing-hormone-agonist triptorelin. Breast cancer-free interval (BCFI) was compared between patients who received OFS concurrently with chemotherapy in TEXT (n = 1242) versus sequentially post-chemotherapy in SOFT (n = 630). Because timing of trial enrollment relative to adjuvant chemotherapy differed, we implemented landmark analysis re-defining BCFI beginning 1 year after final dose of chemotherapy (median, 15.5 and 8.1 months from enrollment to landmark in TEXT and SOFT, respectively). As a non-randomized treatment comparison, we implemented comparative-effectiveness propensity score methodology with weighted Cox modeling.
Distributions of several clinico-pathologic characteristics differed between groups. Patients who were premenopausal post-chemotherapy in SOFT were younger on average. The median duration of adjuvant chemotherapy was 18 weeks in both groups. There were 231 (12%) BC events after post-landmark median follow-up of about 5 years. Concurrent use of triptorelin with chemotherapy was not associated with a significant difference in post-landmark BCFI compared with sequential triptorelin post-chemotherapy, either in the overall population (HR = 1.11, 95% CI 0.72-1.72; P = 0.72; 4-year BCFI 89% in both groups), or in the subgroup of 692 women <40 years at diagnosis (HR = 1.13, 95% CI 0.69-1.84) who are less likely to develop chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea.
Based on comparative-effectiveness modeling of TEXT and SOFT after about 5 years median follow-up, with limited statistical power especially for the subgroup <40 years, neither detrimental nor beneficial effect of concurrent administration of OFS with chemotherapy on the efficacy of adjuvant therapy that includes chemotherapy was detected.
CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT00066690 and NCT00066703.
最近的乳腺癌治疗指南建议,高危绝经前患者应接受卵巢功能抑制(OFS)作为辅助内分泌治疗的一部分。如果给予化疗,尚不确定是选择同期还是序贯启动 OFS。
我们分析了接受激素受体阳性、HER2 阴性乳腺癌辅助化疗并随机接受含 OFS 的辅助内分泌治疗的 1872 名 TEXT 和 SOFT 试验的随机 III 期患者,这些患者接受了促性腺激素释放激素激动剂 triptorelin 治疗。比较 TEXT 中化疗同期(n=1242)和 SOFT 中化疗后序贯(n=630)接受 OFS 的患者的乳腺癌无复发生存期(BCFI)。由于试验入组时间与辅助化疗的时间不同,我们通过定义从化疗最后一剂后 1 年开始的 landmark 分析重新定义 BCFI(分别为 TEXT 和 SOFT 中从入组到 landmark 的中位时间 15.5 和 8.1 个月)。作为非随机治疗比较,我们采用加权 Cox 模型进行了基于比较效果倾向评分的方法。
两组之间的一些临床病理特征分布不同。SOFT 中化疗后绝经前的患者平均年龄较小。两组的辅助化疗中位时间均为 18 周。在大约 5 年的中位随访后,有 231 例(12%)发生了 BC 事件。与化疗后序贯使用 triptorelin 相比,化疗同期使用 triptorelin 并未显著影响 landmark 后 BCFI,无论是在总体人群中(HR=1.11,95%CI 0.72-1.72;P=0.72;两组 4 年 BCFI 均为 89%),还是在诊断时年龄<40 岁的 692 名女性亚组中(HR=1.13,95%CI 0.69-1.84),这些女性不太可能发生化疗诱导的闭经。
基于大约 5 年中位随访的 TEXT 和 SOFT 的基于比较效果的建模,尤其是在<40 岁的亚组中,统计效力有限,既没有检测到同期给予 OFS 与化疗对包括化疗在内的辅助治疗疗效的有害或有益影响。
临床试验.gov:NCT00066690 和 NCT00066703。