• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

系统综述的应用:1. 引言——为何、何事、何时、如何。

Living systematic review: 1. Introduction-the why, what, when, and how.

机构信息

Cochrane Australia, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 4th Floor, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases, Monash University and Alfred Hospital, 53 Commercial Road, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia.

Cochrane Australia, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 4th Floor, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia; Centre for Health Communication and Participation, School of Psychology and Public Health, Level 4, Health Sciences 2, Science Drive, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria 3086, Australia.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Nov;91:23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.08.010. Epub 2017 Sep 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.08.010
PMID:28912002
Abstract

Systematic reviews are difficult to keep up to date, but failure to do so leads to a decay in review currency, accuracy, and utility. We are developing a novel approach to systematic review updating termed "Living systematic review" (LSR): systematic reviews that are continually updated, incorporating relevant new evidence as it becomes available. LSRs may be particularly important in fields where research evidence is emerging rapidly, current evidence is uncertain, and new research may change policy or practice decisions. We hypothesize that a continual approach to updating will achieve greater currency and validity, and increase the benefits to end users, with feasible resource requirements over time.

摘要

系统评价很难保持最新,但如果不这样做,就会导致评价的时效性、准确性和实用性下降。我们正在开发一种新的系统评价更新方法,称为“实时系统评价”(LSR):不断更新的系统评价,将新出现的相关证据纳入其中。LSR 在研究证据快速出现、现有证据不确定、新研究可能改变政策或实践决策的领域可能特别重要。我们假设,持续的更新方法将提高时效性和有效性,并随着时间的推移,以可行的资源需求,增加对最终用户的益处。

相似文献

1
Living systematic review: 1. Introduction-the why, what, when, and how.系统综述的应用:1. 引言——为何、何事、何时、如何。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Nov;91:23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.08.010. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
2
Living Systematic Reviews.系统综述的实践
Methods Mol Biol. 2022;2345:121-134. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1566-9_7.
3
Living systematic reviews: an emerging opportunity to narrow the evidence-practice gap.实时系统评价:缩小证据-实践差距的新契机。
PLoS Med. 2014 Feb 18;11(2):e1001603. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001603. eCollection 2014 Feb.
4
Experience report of two living systematic Cochrane reviews on COVID-19.两项关于 COVID-19 的现行系统评价的经验报告。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2024 Mar;184:90-95. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2023.11.004. Epub 2024 Jan 13.
5
Methods of conduct and reporting of living systematic reviews: a protocol for a living methodological survey.实时系统评价的实施与报告方法:一项实时方法学调查的方案
F1000Res. 2019 Feb 26;8:221. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.18005.2. eCollection 2019.
6
Methods and guidance on conducting, reporting, publishing and appraising living systematic reviews: a scoping review protocol.系统评价实施、报告、出版和评价方法的指南:范围综述方案。
F1000Res. 2021 Aug 13;10:802. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.55108.1. eCollection 2021.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Proposed triggers for retiring a living systematic review.建议用于终止一项正在进行的系统综述的触发因素。
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2023 Oct;28(5):348-352. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2022-112100. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
9
Optimizing process and methods for a living systematic review: 30 search updates and three review updates later.优化循证综述的流程与方法:历经30次检索更新及三次综述更新之后。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Feb;166:111231. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.111231. Epub 2023 Dec 1.
10
From standard systematic reviews to living systematic reviews.从标准系统评价到实时系统评价。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2023 Feb;176:76-81. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.11.007. Epub 2023 Jan 24.

引用本文的文献

1
A scoping review of Indigenous community-based research practices, guidelines, and ethical standards.对基于原住民社区的研究实践、指南和道德标准的范围界定综述。
Can J Public Health. 2025 Aug 25. doi: 10.17269/s41997-025-01090-w.
2
Incorporating Preprints in Systematic Reviews: A Preliminary Study of a Novel Method for Rapid Evidence Synthesis.将预印本纳入系统评价:快速证据综合新方法的初步研究。
medRxiv. 2025 Jul 16:2025.07.15.25331581. doi: 10.1101/2025.07.15.25331581.
3
CLEAR: A vision to support clinical evidence lifecycle with continuous learning.
清晰:通过持续学习支持临床证据生命周期的愿景。
J Biomed Inform. 2025 Jul 29;169:104884. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2025.104884.
4
Application of Biomarkers in Spinal Muscular Atrophy.生物标志物在脊髓性肌萎缩症中的应用。
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Jul 17;26(14):6887. doi: 10.3390/ijms26146887.
5
Operationalization of Artificial Intelligence Applications in the Intensive Care Unit: A Systematic Review.重症监护病房中人工智能应用的实施:一项系统综述。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jul 1;8(7):e2522866. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.22866.
6
Cochrane's COVID-19 Living Systematic Reviews: A Mixed-Methods Study of Their Conduct, Reporting and Currency.Cochrane新冠病毒实时系统评价:关于其开展、报告及时效性的混合方法研究
Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2025 Mar 28;3(3):e70024. doi: 10.1002/cesm.70024. eCollection 2025 May.
7
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning to Improve Evidence Synthesis Production Efficiency: An Observational Study of Resource Use and Time-to-Completion.人工智能与机器学习助力提高证据综合生成效率:资源利用与完成时间的观察性研究
Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2025 May 19;3(3):e70030. doi: 10.1002/cesm.70030. eCollection 2025 May.
8
Do occupational health and safety tools that utilize artificial intelligence have a measurable impact on worker injury or illness? Findings from a systematic review.利用人工智能的职业健康与安全工具对工人受伤或患病是否有可衡量的影响?一项系统评价的结果
Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 11;14(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s13643-025-02869-1.
9
Validation of The Umbrella Collaboration for Tertiary Evidence Synthesis in Geriatrics: Mixed Methods Study.老年医学三级证据综合的伞状合作验证:混合方法研究
JMIR Form Res. 2025 Jul 8;9:e75215. doi: 10.2196/75215.
10
Identifying optimal primary prevention interventions for major cardiovascular disease events and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and hierarchical network meta-analysis of RCTs.确定主要心血管疾病事件和全因死亡率的最佳一级预防干预措施:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和分层网络荟萃分析
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul;29(37):1-65. doi: 10.3310/RLDH7432.