• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对基于原住民社区的研究实践、指南和道德标准的范围界定综述。

A scoping review of Indigenous community-based research practices, guidelines, and ethical standards.

作者信息

Toombs Elaine, Skov Brittany, Campbell Megan, Lund Jessie, Mushquash Christopher J

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada.

Dilico Anishinabek Family Care, Fort William First Nation, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Public Health. 2025 Aug 25. doi: 10.17269/s41997-025-01090-w.

DOI:10.17269/s41997-025-01090-w
PMID:40853533
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

There has been increased efforts to identify wise practices among research efforts completed in partnership with Indigenous communities. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) has been a leading guideline for this work in recent years, as such frameworks emphasize collaboration, partnership, and community-guided efforts; however, no work to date has examined how various CBPR standards, ethical guidelines, and practices may vary by community or regional context.

METHOD

The purpose of this scoping review was to summarize Indigenous-specific research practices among relevant frameworks, to identify more common collective values and practices, and other, potentially more unique or distinctive aspects of frameworks within Canadian, Australian, New Zealand, and United States (CANZUS) nation-based Indigenous communities. A scoping review of six databases to retrieve relevant literature describing community-based research principles, guidelines, and ethical standards specifically related to an Indigenous population or community.

SYNTHESIS

We retrieved 46 sources proposing an Indigenous-based principle, guideline, and/or ethical standard. When these studies were descriptively analyzed, we derived eight common themes across these frameworks: Benefit to Community, Respect, Reciprocal Relationships, Recognize Diversity, Embed Indigenous Culture, Autonomous and Active Participation, Consultation, and Authenticity. Specific research practices that align within framework values across a research process were also identified across ten themes, and 38 sub-themes. Practices included Learn About Culture, Region, Community, or Nation, Establish and Maintain Meaningful Relationships, Community Engagement or Consultation, Project Design, Develop a Research Agreement, Data Agreement, and/or Protocols, Project Management, Methods, Data Analysis and Interpretation, Knowledge Translation and Exchange, and Post-Research Relationships.

CONCLUSION

Several common values and practices underscore many Indigenous community-based research guidelines, principles, and ethical standards. This review may be used to increase knowledge on Indigenous approaches to research across disciplines, facilitate the evaluation of research conducted with Indigenous communities, and assist communities in developing independent practices, principles, and ethical guidelines.

摘要

目标

人们越来越努力在与原住民社区合作完成的研究工作中识别明智的做法。近年来,基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)一直是这项工作的主要指导方针,因为此类框架强调合作、伙伴关系和社区主导的努力;然而,迄今为止,尚无研究探讨各种CBPR标准、伦理准则和做法如何因社区或地区背景而异。

方法

本范围综述的目的是总结相关框架中针对原住民的研究实践,识别更常见的集体价值观和实践,以及加拿大、澳大利亚、新西兰和美国(CANZUS)基于国家的原住民社区框架中其他可能更独特或与众不同的方面。对六个数据库进行范围综述,以检索描述与原住民群体或社区特别相关的基于社区的研究原则、指南和伦理标准的相关文献。

综合

我们检索到46篇提出基于原住民的原则、指南和/或伦理标准的文献。对这些研究进行描述性分析时,我们在这些框架中得出了八个共同主题:社区受益、尊重、互惠关系、认识多样性、融入原住民文化、自主和积极参与、协商以及真实性。还在十个主题和38个子主题中确定了在整个研究过程中与框架价值观一致的具体研究实践。实践包括了解文化、地区、社区或国家,建立和维持有意义的关系,社区参与或协商,项目设计,制定研究协议、数据协议和/或方案,项目管理,方法,数据分析与解释,知识转化与交流,以及研究后关系。

结论

一些共同的价值观和实践强调了许多基于原住民社区的研究指南、原则和伦理标准。本综述可用于增加各学科对原住民研究方法的了解,促进对与原住民社区开展的研究的评估,并协助社区制定独立的实践、原则和伦理指南。

相似文献

1
A scoping review of Indigenous community-based research practices, guidelines, and ethical standards.对基于原住民社区的研究实践、指南和道德标准的范围界定综述。
Can J Public Health. 2025 Aug 25. doi: 10.17269/s41997-025-01090-w.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
4
Developing evidence-based guidelines for describing potential benefits and harms within patient information leaflets/sheets (PILs) that inform and do not cause harm (PrinciPILs).制定基于证据的指南,用于在患者信息单页/说明书(PrinciPILs)中描述潜在益处和危害,这些信息单页既能提供信息又不会造成伤害。
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Aug;29(43):1-20. doi: 10.3310/GJJH2402.
5
How equitable is the conduct of public health research? Findings across case studies from India and Australia.公共卫生研究的开展有多公平?来自印度和澳大利亚的案例研究结果
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Aug 8;24(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02593-1.
6
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
7
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
8
The use of Open Dialogue in Trauma Informed Care services for mental health consumers and their family networks: A scoping review.创伤知情护理服务中使用开放对话模式为心理健康消费者及其家庭网络提供服务:范围综述。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2024 Aug;31(4):681-698. doi: 10.1111/jpm.13023. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
9
How to Implement Digital Clinical Consultations in UK Maternity Care: the ARM@DA Realist Review.如何在英国产科护理中实施数字临床会诊:ARM@DA实证主义综述
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 May 21:1-77. doi: 10.3310/WQFV7425.
10
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训

本文引用的文献

1
Indigenous peoples and local communities as partners in the sequencing of global eukaryotic biodiversity.原住民和当地社区作为全球真核生物多样性测序的合作伙伴。
NPJ Biodivers. 2023;2(1):8. doi: 10.1038/s44185-023-00013-7. Epub 2023 Apr 3.
2
Indigenous Peoples and research: self-determination in research governance.原住民与研究:研究治理中的自决权
Front Res Metr Anal. 2023 Nov 15;8:1272318. doi: 10.3389/frma.2023.1272318. eCollection 2023.
3
Methodological Reflections of a Student- and Community-based Partnership on Operationalizing a Community-based Participatory Research Model: Recommendations for Building, Securing, and Sustaining Partnerships.
学生和社区伙伴关系在实施基于社区的参与式研究模型方面的方法学反思:建立、保障和维持伙伴关系的建议。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2022;16(3):401-409. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2022.0056.
4
Operationalizing the CARE and FAIR Principles for Indigenous data futures.为原住民数据的未来实施 CARE 和 FAIR 原则。
Sci Data. 2021 Apr 16;8(1):108. doi: 10.1038/s41597-021-00892-0.
5
Beyond the Belmont Principles: A Community-Based Approach to Developing an Indigenous Ethics Model and Curriculum for Training Health Researchers Working with American Indian and Alaska Native Communities.超越贝尔蒙原则:以社区为基础制定培训与美洲印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民社区合作的卫生研究人员的土著伦理模式和课程。
Am J Community Psychol. 2019 Sep;64(1-2):9-20. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12360. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
6
Applying a community-based participatory research framework to patient and family engagement in the development of patient-centered outcomes research and practice.将基于社区的参与式研究框架应用于患者和家属参与以患者为中心的结局研究和实践的发展。
Transl Behav Med. 2018 Sep 8;8(5):683-691. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibx026.
7
Innovating for Transformation in First Nations Health Using Community-Based Participatory Research.利用基于社区的参与式研究创新第一民族卫生转型。
Qual Health Res. 2018 Jun;28(7):1036-1049. doi: 10.1177/1049732318756056. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
8
Living systematic review: 1. Introduction-the why, what, when, and how.系统综述的应用:1. 引言——为何、何事、何时、如何。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Nov;91:23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.08.010. Epub 2017 Sep 11.
9
Rethinking the Belmont Report?重新思考《贝尔蒙报告》?
Am J Bioeth. 2017 Jul;17(7):15-21. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2017.1329482.
10
Total Brain and Hippocampal Volumes and Cognition in Older American Indians: The Strong Heart Study.美国印第安老年人的全脑和海马体体积与认知:强心研究
Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2017 Apr-Jun;31(2):94-100. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0000000000000203.