• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

缓释地尔硫䓬作为β受体阻滞剂和利尿剂的替代疗法用于稳定型心绞痛和并存原发性高血压的疗效及安全性:一项多中心试验

Efficacy and safety of sustained-release diltiazem as replacement therapy for beta blockers and diuretics for stable angina pectoris and coexisting essential hypertension: a multicenter trial.

作者信息

Kawanishi D T, Leman R B, Pratt C M, O'Rourke R A

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles 90033.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1987 Dec 14;60(17):29I-35I. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(87)90456-5.

DOI:10.1016/0002-9149(87)90456-5
PMID:2891291
Abstract

To determine if a sustained-release form of the calcium entry blocker diltiazem would be a satisfactory substitute for the combination of beta-adrenergic blocking agent and thiazide diuretic in the treatment of systemic hypertension and angina pectoris, 38 patients were studied in a 4-center trial. Blood pressure and heart rate were measured in the supine position, immediately after and 5 minutes after standing. Modified Bruce protocol treadmill tests were performed to determine the time to onset of 1 mm ST-segment depression, time to onset of chest pain and time to termination of exercise. Diltiazem monotherapy resulted in equivalent blood pressure control in 28 of 38 patients (74%). In the remaining patients, blood pressure control was achieved with resumption of the diuretic. Blood pressure with beta blocker plus diuretic compared with diltiazem were, in the supine position 137 +/- 22/82 +/- 7 (+/- 1 standard deviation) versus 139 +/- 22/82 +/- 8 mm Hg, immediately after standing 131 +/- 20/84 +/- 9 versus 133 +/- 21/82 +/- 10 mm Hg and after standing for 5 minutes 134 +/- 19/85 +/- 8 versus 137 +/- 18/85 +/- 9 mm Hg (difference not significant for each). The heart rate with diltiazem was higher supine (67 +/- 11 versus 60 +/- 11 beats/min), standing (73 +/- 13 versus 64 +/- 14 beats/min) and 5 minutes after standing (73 +/- 14 versus 63 +/- 14 beats/min, p less than 0.01 for each).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

为确定钙通道阻滞剂地尔硫䓬的缓释剂型能否作为β-肾上腺素能阻滞剂与噻嗪类利尿剂联合用药的满意替代方案用于治疗系统性高血压和心绞痛,在一项4中心试验中对38例患者进行了研究。测量了患者仰卧位、站立后即刻及站立5分钟后的血压和心率。采用改良Bruce方案进行平板运动试验,以确定出现1毫米ST段压低的时间、胸痛发作时间和运动终止时间。地尔硫䓬单药治疗使38例患者中的28例(74%)血压得到等效控制。其余患者通过恢复使用利尿剂实现血压控制。β受体阻滞剂加利尿剂组与地尔硫䓬组相比,仰卧位血压分别为137±22/82±7(±1标准差)毫米汞柱和139±22/82±8毫米汞柱,站立后即刻为131±20/84±9毫米汞柱和133±21/82±10毫米汞柱,站立5分钟后为134±19/85±8毫米汞柱和137±18/85±9毫米汞柱(各差异均无统计学意义)。地尔硫䓬组心率在仰卧位(67±11对60±11次/分钟)、站立时(73±13对64±14次/分钟)和站立5分钟后(73±14对63±14次/分钟)均较高(各p均<0.01)。(摘要截断于250字)

相似文献

1
Efficacy and safety of sustained-release diltiazem as replacement therapy for beta blockers and diuretics for stable angina pectoris and coexisting essential hypertension: a multicenter trial.缓释地尔硫䓬作为β受体阻滞剂和利尿剂的替代疗法用于稳定型心绞痛和并存原发性高血压的疗效及安全性:一项多中心试验
Am J Cardiol. 1987 Dec 14;60(17):29I-35I. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(87)90456-5.
2
Response of blood pressure, cardiac output, peripheral resistance, and exercise performance to substitution of calcium blocker for beta-blocker plus thiazide diuretic therapy in patients with both systemic hypertension and mild stable angina.在患有系统性高血压和轻度稳定型心绞痛的患者中,用钙通道阻滞剂替代β受体阻滞剂加噻嗪类利尿剂治疗时,血压、心输出量、外周阻力及运动表现的反应。
Circulation. 1989 Dec;80(6 Suppl):IV162-70.
3
Comparison of diltiazem and nifedipine for both angina pectoris and systemic hypertension.地尔硫䓬与硝苯地平治疗心绞痛和全身性高血压的比较。
Am J Cardiol. 1985 Dec 6;56(16):41H-46H. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(85)90542-9.
4
Comparison of ketanserin and slow-release nifedipine added to the treatment of hypertensive patients uncontrolled by a thiazide diuretic plus beta-adrenoceptor blocker.酮色林与缓释硝苯地平添加至噻嗪类利尿剂加β-肾上腺素受体阻滞剂治疗未控制高血压患者的疗效比较。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1987 Nov;24(5):591-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1987.tb03217.x.
5
Effort angina with adequate beta-receptor blockade: comparison with diltiazem alone and in combination.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986 Feb;7(2):329-35. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(86)80500-9.
6
Combination of calcium channel blockers and beta blockers for patients with exercise-induced angina pectoris: a double-blind parallel-group comparison of different classes of calcium channel blockers. The Netherlands Working Group on Cardiovascular Research (WCN).钙通道阻滞剂与β受体阻滞剂联合用于运动诱发性心绞痛患者:不同类别钙通道阻滞剂的双盲平行组比较。荷兰心血管研究工作组(WCN)。
Angiology. 1999 Jun;50(6):447-54. doi: 10.1177/000331979905000602.
7
Comparison of propranolol, diltiazem, and nifedipine in the treatment of ambulatory ischemia in patients with stable angina. Differential effects on ambulatory ischemia, exercise performance, and anginal symptoms. The ASIS Study Group.普萘洛尔、地尔硫䓬和硝苯地平治疗稳定型心绞痛患者动态心肌缺血的比较。对动态心肌缺血、运动能力和心绞痛症状的不同影响。动态心肌缺血研究组。
Circulation. 1990 Dec;82(6):1962-72. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.82.6.1962.
8
Diuretics versus calcium-channel blockers in systemic hypertension: a preliminary multicenter experience with hydrochlorothiazide and sustained-release diltiazem.利尿剂与钙通道阻滞剂治疗系统性高血压的比较:氢氯噻嗪与缓释地尔硫䓬的初步多中心经验
Am J Cardiol. 1985 Dec 6;56(16):92H-96H. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(85)90551-x.
9
Effects of diltiazem alone or with isosorbide dinitrate or with atenolol both acutely and chronically for stable angina pectoris.地尔硫䓬单独使用,或与硝酸异山梨酯或阿替洛尔联合使用,对稳定型心绞痛的急性和慢性影响。
Am J Cardiol. 1989 Oct 1;64(12):717-24. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(89)90753-4.
10
Comparative study of the effect of nifedipine versus diltiazem on exercise performance, serum propranolol levels, and ST-segment abnormalities in patients with chronic stable angina taking propranolol.
Am J Cardiol. 1989 Sep 19;64(11):27F-30F. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(89)90742-x.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparison of diltiazem and metoprolol in hypertension. Swedish Diltiazem-Metoprolol Multicentre Study Group.地尔硫䓬与美托洛尔治疗高血压的比较。瑞典地尔硫䓬 - 美托洛尔多中心研究组。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1990;39(5):427-33. doi: 10.1007/BF00280931.