Suppr超能文献

缓释地尔硫䓬作为β受体阻滞剂和利尿剂的替代疗法用于稳定型心绞痛和并存原发性高血压的疗效及安全性:一项多中心试验

Efficacy and safety of sustained-release diltiazem as replacement therapy for beta blockers and diuretics for stable angina pectoris and coexisting essential hypertension: a multicenter trial.

作者信息

Kawanishi D T, Leman R B, Pratt C M, O'Rourke R A

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Southern California School of Medicine, Los Angeles 90033.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1987 Dec 14;60(17):29I-35I. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(87)90456-5.

Abstract

To determine if a sustained-release form of the calcium entry blocker diltiazem would be a satisfactory substitute for the combination of beta-adrenergic blocking agent and thiazide diuretic in the treatment of systemic hypertension and angina pectoris, 38 patients were studied in a 4-center trial. Blood pressure and heart rate were measured in the supine position, immediately after and 5 minutes after standing. Modified Bruce protocol treadmill tests were performed to determine the time to onset of 1 mm ST-segment depression, time to onset of chest pain and time to termination of exercise. Diltiazem monotherapy resulted in equivalent blood pressure control in 28 of 38 patients (74%). In the remaining patients, blood pressure control was achieved with resumption of the diuretic. Blood pressure with beta blocker plus diuretic compared with diltiazem were, in the supine position 137 +/- 22/82 +/- 7 (+/- 1 standard deviation) versus 139 +/- 22/82 +/- 8 mm Hg, immediately after standing 131 +/- 20/84 +/- 9 versus 133 +/- 21/82 +/- 10 mm Hg and after standing for 5 minutes 134 +/- 19/85 +/- 8 versus 137 +/- 18/85 +/- 9 mm Hg (difference not significant for each). The heart rate with diltiazem was higher supine (67 +/- 11 versus 60 +/- 11 beats/min), standing (73 +/- 13 versus 64 +/- 14 beats/min) and 5 minutes after standing (73 +/- 14 versus 63 +/- 14 beats/min, p less than 0.01 for each).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

为确定钙通道阻滞剂地尔硫䓬的缓释剂型能否作为β-肾上腺素能阻滞剂与噻嗪类利尿剂联合用药的满意替代方案用于治疗系统性高血压和心绞痛,在一项4中心试验中对38例患者进行了研究。测量了患者仰卧位、站立后即刻及站立5分钟后的血压和心率。采用改良Bruce方案进行平板运动试验,以确定出现1毫米ST段压低的时间、胸痛发作时间和运动终止时间。地尔硫䓬单药治疗使38例患者中的28例(74%)血压得到等效控制。其余患者通过恢复使用利尿剂实现血压控制。β受体阻滞剂加利尿剂组与地尔硫䓬组相比,仰卧位血压分别为137±22/82±7(±1标准差)毫米汞柱和139±22/82±8毫米汞柱,站立后即刻为131±20/84±9毫米汞柱和133±21/82±10毫米汞柱,站立5分钟后为134±19/85±8毫米汞柱和137±18/85±9毫米汞柱(各差异均无统计学意义)。地尔硫䓬组心率在仰卧位(67±11对60±11次/分钟)、站立时(73±13对64±14次/分钟)和站立5分钟后(73±14对63±14次/分钟)均较高(各p均<0.01)。(摘要截断于250字)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验