Suppr超能文献

全腹腔镜子宫切除术与腹式子宫切除术的比较。

Comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy.

作者信息

Balcı Osman

机构信息

Necmettin Erbakan University Meram Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Konya, Turkey.

出版信息

Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Dec;11(4):224-227. doi: 10.4274/tjod.47108. Epub 2014 Dec 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this prospective study is to evaluate and compare to the outcomes of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) who performed in our clinic.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed surgical procedures at Necmettin Erbakan University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology between January 2013 and April 2014. Forty patients who underwent TLH (group 1) compared to 40 patients who underwent TAH (group 2). The mean age of the cases, body mass index (BMI), duration of operation, the amount of blood loss, rates of complications and post operative hospital stay were compared for two groups.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups regarding age, body mass index (BMI), specimen weight, pre-operative hemoglobin (Hb) value and rates of the complications. The mean post-operative Hb value was significantly higher in group 1 than group 2 (11.5±0.8 gr/dl vs. 10.8±1.7, p=0.02). The mean time of operation was significantly longer in group 1 than in group 2 (105.4±22.9 minutes vs. 74±18, p<0.001). The mean duration of hospital stay was statistically shorter in group 1 compared to the group 2 (2.48±0.6 days vs. 4.88±1.2, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Total laparoscopic hysterectomy is safe and feasible method for gynecological diseases. TLH may offer specific benefits for properly selected patients. Its advantages are lower peri-operative morbidity, improvement of quality of life, shorter hospital stay and faster return to activity.

摘要

目的

本前瞻性研究旨在评估并比较我院进行的全腹腔镜子宫切除术(TLH)和经腹全子宫切除术(TAH)的手术效果。

材料与方法

2013年1月至2014年4月期间,我们在内梅廷·埃尔巴坎大学医学院妇产科开展了手术。40例行TLH的患者(第1组)与40例行TAH的患者(第2组)进行比较。对比两组患者的平均年龄、体重指数(BMI)、手术时长、失血量、并发症发生率及术后住院时间。

结果

两组在年龄、体重指数(BMI)、标本重量、术前血红蛋白(Hb)值及并发症发生率方面无统计学显著差异。第1组术后平均Hb值显著高于第2组(11.5±0.8克/分升 vs. 10.8±1.7,p = 0.02)。第1组平均手术时间显著长于第2组(105.4±22.9分钟 vs. 74±18,p<0.001)。第1组平均住院时间在统计学上短于第2组(2.48±0.6天 vs. 4.88±1.2,p<0.001)。

结论

全腹腔镜子宫切除术是治疗妇科疾病安全可行的方法。对于适当选择的患者,TLH可能具有特定优势。其优点是围手术期发病率较低、生活质量改善、住院时间缩短且恢复活动更快。

相似文献

6
A Comparison between Total Abdominal Hysterectomy versus Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.全腹子宫切除术与全腹腔镜子宫切除术的比较
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2023 Dec 7;13(1):43-47. doi: 10.4103/gmit.gmit_72_23. eCollection 2024 Jan-Mar.

本文引用的文献

6
Hysterectomy as treatment for dysfunctional uterine bleeding.
Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1999 Jun;13(2):251-69. doi: 10.1053/beog.1999.0021.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验