Howard F M, Sanchez R
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, New York.
J Gynecol Surg. 1993 Summer;9(2):83-90. doi: 10.1089/gyn.1993.9.83.
The goal of this study was to compare laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) with total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH). We performed a prospective comparison of the hospital courses of 30 women, 15 undergoing LAVH and 15 undergoing TAH, in a teaching hospital setting. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used, with statistical evaluation of differences by Student's t-test for normally distributed data and Kruskal-Wallis for data with dissimilar variances. Fourteen of fifteen patients scheduled for LAVH had their surgery completed without need of a laparotomy. In the LAVH group, (1) mean surgical time was 50 minutes longer, (2) blood loss, complications, and hospital costs were not statistically different, (3) hospital days averaged 1 1/2 less, and (4) postoperative pain ratings and medication requirements were significantly decreased, compared with the TAH group. In many cases, LAVH may be reasonably performed instead of an indicated TAH.
本研究的目的是比较腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术(LAVH)与经腹全子宫切除术(TAH)。我们在一家教学医院环境中,对30名女性的住院过程进行了前瞻性比较,其中15例行LAVH,15例行TAH。采用方差分析(ANOVA),对正态分布数据的差异通过学生t检验进行统计学评估,对方差不同的数据通过Kruskal-Wallis检验进行评估。计划行LAVH的15例患者中有14例无需开腹即完成了手术。与TAH组相比,LAVH组:(1)平均手术时间长50分钟;(2)失血量、并发症和住院费用无统计学差异;(3)平均住院天数少1.5天;(4)术后疼痛评分和药物需求量显著降低。在许多情况下,可以合理地施行LAVH而非有指征的TAH。