Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术与腹式子宫切除术的比较。

A comparison of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy.

作者信息

Howard F M, Sanchez R

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, New York.

出版信息

J Gynecol Surg. 1993 Summer;9(2):83-90. doi: 10.1089/gyn.1993.9.83.

Abstract

The goal of this study was to compare laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) with total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH). We performed a prospective comparison of the hospital courses of 30 women, 15 undergoing LAVH and 15 undergoing TAH, in a teaching hospital setting. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used, with statistical evaluation of differences by Student's t-test for normally distributed data and Kruskal-Wallis for data with dissimilar variances. Fourteen of fifteen patients scheduled for LAVH had their surgery completed without need of a laparotomy. In the LAVH group, (1) mean surgical time was 50 minutes longer, (2) blood loss, complications, and hospital costs were not statistically different, (3) hospital days averaged 1 1/2 less, and (4) postoperative pain ratings and medication requirements were significantly decreased, compared with the TAH group. In many cases, LAVH may be reasonably performed instead of an indicated TAH.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术(LAVH)与经腹全子宫切除术(TAH)。我们在一家教学医院环境中,对30名女性的住院过程进行了前瞻性比较,其中15例行LAVH,15例行TAH。采用方差分析(ANOVA),对正态分布数据的差异通过学生t检验进行统计学评估,对方差不同的数据通过Kruskal-Wallis检验进行评估。计划行LAVH的15例患者中有14例无需开腹即完成了手术。与TAH组相比,LAVH组:(1)平均手术时间长50分钟;(2)失血量、并发症和住院费用无统计学差异;(3)平均住院天数少1.5天;(4)术后疼痛评分和药物需求量显著降低。在许多情况下,可以合理地施行LAVH而非有指征的TAH。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验