Leaman Jane, Richards Anna Amelia, Emslie Lynn, O'Moore Eamonn Joseph
Health and Justice Team, Public Health England, Reading, UK.
Public Health Devon, Devon County Council, Exeter, UK.
Int J Prison Health. 2017 Sep 11;13(3-4):139-167. doi: 10.1108/IJPH-09-2016-0056.
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to understand the components of a high-quality prison healthcare system and the impact, ten-years on, of the transfer of accountability in England, from a justice ministry to a health ministry. Design/methodology/approach A rapid the evidence review was undertaken, which included a review of 82 papers and qualitative interviews with key informants. The concepts and themes identified were summarised and analysed through a framework analysis, designed to improve population outcomes and address health inequalities. The use of a rapid evidence assessment, rather than a systematic review methodology, the use of abstracts (rather than full-text articles) to extract the data, and limiting the search strategy to articles published in the English language only might mean that some relevant research papers and themes were not identified. The need for the evidence to be produced within a limited time frame and with limited resources determined these pragmatic approaches. Findings The review found that English prison healthcare has undergone "transformation" during this period, leading to increased quality of care through organisational engagement, professionalisation of the healthcare workforce, transparency, use of evidence-based guidance and responsiveness of services. The review also highlighted that there is still room for improvement, for example, relating to the prison regime and the lack of focus on early/preventive interventions, as well as specific challenges from limited resources. Research limitations/implications Time and resource constraints meant a rapid evidence review of papers in the English language was undertaken, rather than a systematic review. This might mean relevant papers have been missed. The review also only covered small number of countries, which may limit the transferability of findings. The lack of qualitative data necessitated the use of quantitative data gathered from key informants. However, this enabled a good understanding of current practice. Practical implications The review findings support the World Health Organisation position on the value of integrated prison and public health systems in improving quality of healthcare. It also recommends future policy needs to take account of the "whole prison approach" recognising that healthcare in prisons cannot operate in isolation from the prison regime or the community. Originality/value This is unique research which has great value in supporting prison reform in England. It will also be of interest internationally due to the paucity of data in the published peer-reviewed literature on the impact of commissioning models on healthcare or health outcomes.
目的 本文旨在了解高质量监狱医疗系统的组成部分,以及英格兰十年前将问责制从司法部转移到卫生部所产生的影响。
设计/方法/途径 进行了一项快速证据审查,包括对82篇论文的审查以及对关键信息提供者的定性访谈。通过框架分析对确定的概念和主题进行了总结和分析,旨在改善人群健康结果并解决健康不平等问题。采用快速证据评估而非系统综述方法、使用摘要(而非全文文章)提取数据以及将搜索策略仅限于仅以英文发表的文章,可能意味着一些相关研究论文和主题未被识别。在有限时间框架和有限资源内生成证据的必要性决定了这些务实方法。
发现 审查发现,在此期间,英格兰的监狱医疗经历了“变革”,通过组织参与、医疗人员专业化、透明度、使用循证指南以及服务响应性,护理质量得到了提高。审查还强调,仍有改进空间,例如,与监狱管理制度以及缺乏对早期/预防性干预措施的关注有关,以及资源有限带来的具体挑战。
研究局限性/影响 时间和资源限制意味着对英文论文进行了快速证据审查,而非系统综述。这可能意味着遗漏了相关论文。审查也仅涵盖少数国家,这可能会限制研究结果的可转移性。缺乏定性数据使得必须使用从关键信息提供者收集的定量数据。然而,这有助于很好地理解当前做法。
实际意义 审查结果支持世界卫生组织关于监狱与公共卫生系统整合在提高医疗质量方面的价值的立场。它还建议未来政策需要考虑“整体监狱方法”,认识到监狱医疗不能脱离监狱管理制度或社区单独运作。
原创性/价值 这是一项独特的研究,对支持英格兰的监狱改革具有巨大价值。由于已发表的同行评审文献中关于委托模式对医疗保健或健康结果影响的数据匮乏,它在国际上也将受到关注。