Wang Feng, Qin Zhiqiang, Si Shuhui, Tang Jingyuan, Xu Lingyan, Xu Haoxiang, Li Ran, Han Peng, Yang Haiwei
Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210009, China.
State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Oncotarget. 2017 Jul 5;8(34):57440-57450. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.19023. eCollection 2017 Aug 22.
Previous studies have investigated the association between NAT2 polymorphism and the risk of prostate cancer (PCa). However, the findings from these studies remained inconsistent. Hence, we performed a meta-analysis to provide a more reliable conclusion about such associations. In the present meta-analysis, 13 independent case-control studies were included with a total of 14,469 PCa patients and 10,689 controls. All relevant studies published were searched in the databates PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science, till March 1st, 2017. We used the pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to evaluate the strength of the association between NAT24 allele and susceptibility to PCa. Subgroup analysis was carried out by ethnicity, source of controls and genotyping method. What's more, we also performed trial sequential analysis (TSA) to reduce the risk of type I error and evaluate whether the evidence of the results was firm. Firstly, our results indicated that NAT24 allele was not associated with PCa susceptibility (OR = 1.00, 95% CI= 0.95-1.05; = 0.100). However, after excluding two studies for its heterogeneity and publication bias, no significant relationship was also detected between NAT2*4 allele and the increased risk of PCa, in fixed-effect model (OR = 0.99, 95% CI= 0.94-1.04; = 0.451). Meanwhile, no significant increased risk of PCa was found in the subgroup analyses by ethnicity, source of controls and genotyping method. Moreover, TSA demonstrated that such association was confirmed in the present study. Therefore, this meta-analysis suggested that no significant association between NAT2 polymorphism and the risk of PCa was found.
既往研究探讨了NAT2基因多态性与前列腺癌(PCa)风险之间的关联。然而,这些研究的结果并不一致。因此,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以得出关于此类关联的更可靠结论。在本荟萃分析中,纳入了13项独立的病例对照研究,共14469例PCa患者和10689例对照。检索了截至2017年3月1日在数据库PubMed、EMBASE和科学网中发表的所有相关研究。我们使用合并比值比(OR)及95%置信区间(CI)来评估NAT24等位基因与PCa易感性之间关联的强度。按种族、对照来源和基因分型方法进行亚组分析。此外,我们还进行了试验序贯分析(TSA)以降低I型错误风险,并评估结果的证据是否确凿。首先,我们的结果表明,NAT24等位基因与PCa易感性无关(OR = 1.00,95%CI = 0.95 - 1.05;P = 0.100)。然而,在排除两项存在异质性和发表偏倚的研究后,在固定效应模型中也未检测到NAT2*4等位基因与PCa风险增加之间存在显著关系(OR = 0.99,95%CI = 0.94 - 1.04;P = 0.451)。同时,在按种族、对照来源和基因分型方法进行的亚组分析中,未发现PCa风险有显著增加。此外,TSA表明本研究证实了这种关联。因此,这项荟萃分析表明,未发现NAT2基因多态性与PCa风险之间存在显著关联。