McLeod Carmen, Nerlich Brigitte, Mohr Alison
University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
University of Nottingham , University of Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Energy Res Soc Sci. 2017 Aug;30:35-42. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.06.017.
The UK government has made significant investment into so called 'fourth-generation' biofuel technologies. These biofuels are based on engineering the metabolic pathways of bacteria in order to create products compatible with existing infrastructure. Bacteria play an important role in what is promoted as a potentially new biological industrial revolution, which could address some of the negative environmental legacies of the last. This article presents results from ethnographic research with synthetic biologists who are challenged with balancing the curiosity-driven and intrinsically fulfilling scientific task of working with bacteria, alongside the policy-driven task of putting bacteria to work for extrinsic economic gains. In addition, the scientists also have to balance these demands with a new research governance framework, Responsible Research and Innovation, which envisions technoscientific innovation will be responsive to societal concerns and work in collaboration with stakeholders and members of the public. Major themes emerging from the ethnographic research revolve around stewardship, care, responsibility and agency. An overall conflict surfaces between individual agents assuming responsibility for 'stewarding' bacteria, against funding systems and structures imposing responsibility for economic growth. We discuss these findings against the theoretical backdrop of a new concept of 'energopolitics' and an anthropology of ethics and responsibility.
英国政府已对所谓的“第四代”生物燃料技术进行了大量投资。这些生物燃料基于对细菌代谢途径的工程改造,以制造与现有基础设施兼容的产品。在这场被宣传为潜在的新生物工业革命中,细菌发挥着重要作用,这场革命有望解决上一次工业革命遗留的一些负面环境问题。本文展示了对合成生物学家进行人种志研究的结果,这些科学家面临着挑战,既要平衡研究细菌这一受好奇心驱动且本质上令人满足的科学任务,又要完成政策驱动的利用细菌实现外部经济收益的任务。此外,科学家们还必须在这些需求与一个新的研究治理框架——“负责任的研究与创新”之间取得平衡,该框架设想技术科学创新将回应社会关切,并与利益相关者及公众合作。人种志研究中出现的主要主题围绕着管理、关怀、责任和能动性。在承担“管理”细菌责任的个体行为者与施加经济增长责任的资金系统和结构之间,出现了全面冲突。我们将依据“能源政治”这一新概念以及伦理与责任人类学的理论背景来讨论这些发现。