McKee Amy E, Markon André O, Chan-Tack Kirk M, Lurie Peter
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration, College Park, MD, USA.
J Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Oct;57 Suppl 10:S136-S142. doi: 10.1002/jcph.960.
In this review of individual patient expanded-access requests to the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research for the period Fiscal Year 2010 to Fiscal Year 2014, we evaluated the number of applications received and the number allowed to proceed. We also evaluated whether drugs and certain biologics obtained under expanded access went on to be approved by the Food and Drug Administration. Finally, we considered concerns that adverse events occurring during expanded access might place sponsors at risk for legal liability. Overall, 98% of individual patient expanded-access requests were allowed to proceed. During the study period, among drugs without a previous approval for any indication or dosage form, 24% of unique drugs (ie, multiple applications for access to the same drug were considered to relate to 1 unique drug), and 20% of expanded-access applications received marketing approval by 1 year after initial submission; 43% and 33%, respectively, were approved by 5 years after initial submission. A search of 3 legal databases and a database of news articles did not appear to identify any product liability cases arising from the use of a product in expanded access. Our analyses seek to give physicians and patients a realistic perspective on the likelihood of a drug's approval as well as certain information regarding the product liability risks for commercial sponsors when providing expanded access to investigational drugs. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)'s expanded-access program maintains a careful balance between authorizing patient access to potentially beneficial drugs and protecting them from drugs that may have unknown risks. At the same time, the agency wishes to maintain the integrity of the clinical trials process, ultimately the best way to get safe and effective drugs to patients.
在本次对2010财年至2014财年期间向药品评价和研究中心提出的患者个人扩大使用申请的回顾中,我们评估了收到的申请数量以及获准继续进行的申请数量。我们还评估了通过扩大使用途径获得的药物和某些生物制品是否随后获得了美国食品药品监督管理局的批准。最后,我们考虑了有关扩大使用期间发生的不良事件可能使申办者面临法律责任风险的担忧。总体而言,98%的患者个人扩大使用申请被获准继续进行。在研究期间,对于之前未获任何适应症或剂型批准的药物,24%的独特药物(即,多次申请使用同一药物被视为与1种独特药物相关)以及20%的扩大使用申请在首次提交后1年内获得了上市批准;分别有43%和33%在首次提交后5年内获得批准。对3个法律数据库和一个新闻文章数据库的检索似乎未发现因在扩大使用中使用产品而引发的任何产品责任案件。我们的分析旨在为医生和患者提供关于药物获批可能性的现实观点,以及在提供扩大使用试验性药物时有关商业申办者产品责任风险的某些信息。美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的扩大使用计划在授权患者使用可能有益的药物与保护他们免受可能存在未知风险的药物影响之间保持着谨慎的平衡。与此同时,该机构希望维护临床试验过程的完整性,这最终是为患者提供安全有效药物的最佳方式。