Hayashi Haruto, Nogita Takehide, Maeda Hideki
Department of Regulatory Science, Faculty of Pharmacy, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Regulatory Science, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Science, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024 Jul 11;18:1471-1479. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S468663. eCollection 2024.
An expanded access clinical trials (EACTs) provides exceptional patient access to investigational new drugs for life-threatening diseases for which no effective treatment exists. Based on public information, we have studied EACTs since 2016, when the EACT system was launched in Japan. In this study, we investigated the reality of EACTs by interviewing pharmaceutical companies and clarifying how they view them.
We conducted semi-structured interviews with 10 pharmaceutical companies developing new drugs. This study aims to clarify the status of EACTs, so we selected pharmaceutical companies that develop innovative drugs for which they may perform EACTs (however, experience in conducting EACTs was optional).
All those surveyed were aware of EACTs. Twelve access clinical trials were conducted, and the EACT implementation rate for pivotal clinical trials was 2.5%. The most common reason for implementing an EACT was "requests from physicians and medical institutions" (nine companies, 90.0%), and the most common reason for not implementing an EACT was "the applicability of the system" (five companies). Improvements to EACTs were identified by eight companies (80.0%); financial assistance by six companies (60.0%); reducing the scope of data to be collected and simplifying the procedure by six companies (60.0%). Seven companies (70.0%) responded that a Single Patient Investigational New Drug Application should be conducted, suggesting that the system should be revised.
An interview survey of ten pharmaceutical companies developing new drugs in Japan regarding expanded access clinical trials indicated that there were issues with the system. Many wished to improve the system by establishing a single patient access system, supporting resources, and simplifying procedures. Based on our interviews with 10 Japanese pharmaceutical companies, it was found that the system needed to be improved by introducing a single patient access system, providing supporting resources, and simplifying procedures. In Japan, about eight years have passed since EACT was established, and it appears a revision of the EACT legislation is due.
扩大准入临床试验(EACTs)为患有危及生命疾病且无有效治疗方法的患者提供了获取研究性新药的特殊途径。基于公开信息,自2016年日本启动EACT系统以来,我们一直在研究EACTs。在本研究中,我们通过采访制药公司并阐明他们对EACTs的看法来调查其实际情况。
我们对10家研发新药的制药公司进行了半结构化访谈。本研究旨在阐明EACTs的现状,因此我们选择了可能开展EACTs的创新药物研发制药公司(然而,进行EACTs的经验并非必需)。
所有受访者都知晓EACTs。共进行了12项准入临床试验,关键临床试验的EACT实施率为2.5%。实施EACT的最常见原因是“医生和医疗机构的请求”(9家公司,90.0%),未实施EACT的最常见原因是“系统的适用性”(5家公司)。8家公司(80.0%)指出了EACTs的改进方向;6家公司(60.0%)提到了资金援助;6家公司(60.0%)提出减少数据收集范围并简化程序。7家公司(70.0%)回应应进行单一患者研究性新药申请,这表明该系统应进行修订。
针对日本10家研发新药的制药公司进行的关于扩大准入临床试验的访谈调查表明,该系统存在问题。许多公司希望通过建立单一患者准入系统、提供支持资源和简化程序来改进该系统。基于我们对10家日本制药公司的访谈发现,该系统需要通过引入单一患者准入系统、提供支持资源和简化程序来改进。在日本,自EACT成立以来已过去约八年,似乎EACT立法的修订迫在眉睫。