Naezer Marijke
a Gender and Diversity Studies , Radboud University , Nijmegen , The Netherlands.
Cult Health Sex. 2018 Jun;20(6):715-729. doi: 10.1080/13691058.2017.1372632. Epub 2017 Sep 18.
Western discourses about young people and sexuality centre around the concept of risk. Anxieties have been fuelled by the increasing popularity of social media and practices such as 'sexting' and watching 'sexually explicit' materials online. Research has shown however that such risk discourses mainly serve to moralise about, pathologise and police particular behaviours and children. In order to counter such paternalism, researchers advocated a reconceptualisation of youth not as passive victims, but as active agents who actively negotiate sexual experiences and discourses. In this paper, which is based on ethnographic fieldwork among young people in The Netherlands, I argue that we need a reconceptualisation not only of youth, but also of their sexual practices, especially their online sexual practices. Mobilising an interdisciplinary interaction between critical socio-cultural studies of risk, feminist theory and adventure studies, I propose to reconceptualise these practices as 'adventures' rather than 'risky behaviour'. This opens up possibilities for a more reasoned analysis that acknowledges: (1) the distinction between risks and outcomes of an activity; (2) the constructive potential of risk; and (3) the subjective, dynamic character of risk and pleasure.
西方关于年轻人与性取向的论述以风险概念为核心。社交媒体的日益普及以及诸如“发送色情短信”和在线观看“露骨色情”材料等行为加剧了人们的焦虑。然而,研究表明,此类风险论述主要是为了对特定行为和儿童进行道德评判、将其病态化并加以管控。为了对抗这种家长式作风,研究人员主张重新认识年轻人,不再将他们视为被动的受害者,而是积极主动地协商性体验和性话题的行动者。在本文中,基于对荷兰年轻人的人种志实地调查,我认为我们不仅需要重新认识年轻人,还需要重新认识他们的性行为,尤其是他们的在线性行为。通过调动风险的批判性社会文化研究、女性主义理论和冒险研究之间的跨学科互动,我提议将这些行为重新定义为“冒险”而非“危险行为”。这为更合理的分析开辟了可能性,这种分析承认:(1)活动的风险与结果之间的区别;(2)风险的建设性潜力;(3)风险与愉悦的主观、动态特征。